Epicor Eclipse vs. IFS Applications

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epicor Eclipse
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Epicor Eclipse is an end-to-end business system for wholesale distributors, as well as electrical, HVAC, plumbing and PVF businesses. Eclipse simplifies complex distribution processes found in today’s dynamic supply chains.N/A
IFS Applications
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
Pricing
Epicor EclipseIFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor EclipseIFS Applications
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor EclipseIFS Applications
Considered Both Products
Epicor Eclipse
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Most of my experience has been with Epicor's Prophet 21. For most distribution verticals, Prophet 21 is the only way to go. The comparison I've drawn is this: Prophet 21 is like a ferrari. Epicor Eclipse is like a reliable donkey. Both get you from point A to point B but …
Chose Epicor Eclipse
There aren't any better industry specific ones, but I have looked at Dynamics 365, SAP, Odoo, and others to see if a more robust, configurable, ERP could be customized to suit our industry. Not yet, but the balance is tipping away from Eclipse.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
The first company that I worked for in the wholesale industry had an in house ERP. This ERP, I thought at the time was really great. When I started using e-term, I realized that my first experience of an ERP was not as strong as it could have been.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Since we have been on Eclipse for 13 years, our only comparison to other business systems is when training new employees and ask those new users their opinions during training. In general, nearly all new users of Solar Eclipse are impressed by the ease of use, ease of …
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Been using Eclipse for almost 20 years. It would take something major to make us look elsewhere.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Epicor Eclipse was here when I started 2 years ago. SAP and Great Plains were used at previous employers. Epicor Eclipse versus the others, I would say that Eclipse has the edge in terms of the learning curve for new employees because of how easy it is to use. However, it is …
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Eclipse is more user friendly
IFS Applications
Chose IFS Applications
IFS Applications have a very UI rich interface compared to other systems. IFS Applications can be easily and quickly learned with the very good documentation, e learning portals and other learning platforms. The technical implementation of the IFS Applications is very …
Chose IFS Applications
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation …
Chose IFS Applications
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP.

We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their …
Chose IFS Applications
IFS Cloud, IFS Applications and IFS Field Service Management
Features
Epicor EclipseIFS Applications
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
8.5
Ratings
17% above category average
IFS Applications
2.6
Ratings
94% below category average
Pay calculation10.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration9.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.70 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
API for custom integration7.80 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Plug-ins6.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.8
Ratings
5% below category average
IFS Applications
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Single sign-on capability8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.50 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.6
Ratings
9% below category average
IFS Applications
7.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Dashboards6.70 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standard reports6.40 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Custom reports6.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
IFS Applications
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable6.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support7.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.20 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.30 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.1
Ratings
11% below category average
IFS Applications
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Inventory tracking7.40 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Location management7.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.4
Ratings
6% below category average
IFS Applications
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Pricing7.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order entry7.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Credit card processing8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.80 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.40 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
7.2
Ratings
4% below category average
IFS Applications
3.4
Ratings
75% below category average
Billing Management6.90 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.40 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.30 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.10 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Period Close7.50 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.7
Ratings
29% below category average
IFS Applications
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting6.80 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Project Costing7.20 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Cost Capture6.20 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management6.00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance7.70 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition7.00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.4
Ratings
6% below category average
IFS Applications
3.6
Ratings
62% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling6.60 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers5.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality6.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
8.0
Ratings
7% above category average
IFS Applications
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.1
Ratings
13% below category average
IFS Applications
3.3
Ratings
71% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared5.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring6.80 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Contract Repository4.80 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated6.90 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Supplier Management6.80 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
4.5
Ratings
37% below category average
IFS Applications
4.6
Ratings
35% below category average
Risk Repository2.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Control Management6.20 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments4.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Issue Detection4.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification3.80 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
4.9
Ratings
31% below category average
IFS Applications
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization4.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management4.20 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management4.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management6.30 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management6.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.0
Ratings
39% below category average
IFS Applications
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
Production Process Design4.50 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Production Management5.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Configuration Management6.40 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Work Execution5.40 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs4.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.7
Ratings
22% below category average
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Forecasting6.10 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Inventory Planning6.60 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring5.60 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.2
Ratings
14% below category average
IFS Applications
4.2
Ratings
52% below category average
Proposal Management5.90 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Product Master Data Management6.40 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Epicor EclipseIFS Applications
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Epicor EclipseIFS Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
4.7
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
4.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.5
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Epicor EclipseIFS Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
For medium (with growing pains!) organizations, Epicor's Eclipse software would be a great distribution and point of sale software solution and competes well with other software solutions out there. For large distributors Epicor's custom programming has the ability to tailor their software to customers exact need. I feel the cost of the system would be prohibitive to smaller distributors.
Read full review
Not every Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System does not cover all the industry verticals and all the functionalities and requirements for a specific industry as built-in features. Although IFS Applications does not completely cover all the requirements and all the industry verticals, it can be implemented for any industrial company with minimum configurations and customization, which is very good when implementing an ERP system. Since it supports web and mobile versions of the application as well, the users ind it easy to use.
Read full review
Pros
  • Great for retail sales and it works well with ipads, scanners, credit card machines and was easy to implement.
  • Initial support, setting up Eclipse and ensuring that everything works correctly was a huge benefit. We were off running from the start.
  • Epicor has continuing education on its products and offers alternatives for things they cant do.
Read full review
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Complex Inventory
Read full review
Cons
  • Their support has gotten worse over the years. They fired a large portion of staff in favor of cheaper new hires. It is getting slowly better over time as their support people are gaining experience, but decades of institutional knowledge was lost. Response time can vary wildly depending, which is troubling when you have an immediate need. They have made a partial mea culpa, but the situation is not fully remedied.
  • The user interface is clunky. The original interface, E-term, is a terminal based system (think DOS). A few years ago they rebuilt it using Java and called the new interface Solar, which is a more point and click, windows friendly version. Solar is slower, and so has been difficult for us to get the user adoption we've needed. In addition, any customization we do doesn't work in Solar. Now they have announced a new road-map to make it all web-based. Good luck to them, but it seems they spend all their time playing catch-up instead of making deep system improvements.
  • There are significant gaps in what Eclipse is able to do. Sometimes there are third party products (Proof of Delivery, E-commerce, Tax, etc.), and sometimes Epicor offers in house solutions (Job Management, EDI, etc.). In either case, there are a string of products we have to integrate and maintain to make Eclipse functional. Most of them require support contracts, and have varying degrees of support.
Read full review
  • Project Budget control other than Procurement
  • Customer Advance settlement process should be Manual rather then Auto Adjustment
  • IFS GSO Support should be more proactive
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I use it every day and can't see a reason why I would stop unless I started a new job. If I were to leave my present position, the new job would be much more attractive if they were Eclipse users.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
This is very easy to use for someone that hasn't ever used the system before. Despite any preconceived notions about how a system should function they can learn this and become efficient with really not a lot of effort. I have used many systems and this is probably one of the easiest I have ever had to learn to navigate and use.
Read full review
In overall, the companies get many advantages, where we can forget most of the things which can be considered for room for improvement. The user interface is good. It supports mobile versions an has several mobile applications for specific areas with Android, IOS and Windows versions. It allows several deployment options such as remote hosting, IFS Cloud hosting and on-premise hosting of the servers. IFS Applications can be easily and safely integrated with other systems.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I haven't experienced any outages in the two years I have been using the system. It is always available as long as the computer is up. The only time I have seen it not be available was on occasions where we lost internet, or power and then we lost access to everything, not just Epicor Eclipse.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Everything in this system moves fairly quickly, that may be in part because we are a small company with only 21 users on the system at a time, or it may just be a the way the Epicor Eclipse works for any size company with any number of users. I can only speak for what I know and say that it is fast for our purposes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The tier 1 support is trying, and sometimes they are successful. Sometimes they aren't. This topic isn't as black and white as the questions might suggest. Currently their Tier 1 support team is over seas, all items automatically go to Tier 1 and then when they can't help they either escalate it or tell me they need to check with someone else and they will get back to me. If they escalate me to Tier 2, then the issue comes back to the States and the support is usually at a higher knowledge/experience level and it can get resolved fairly quickly. If they don't escalate, then it might take weeks and multiple follow ups on my part before I either get a satisfactory resolution or finally get escalated.
Read full review
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The training classes that I have attended have been top notch. The presenters are extremely knowledgeable on their subject matter, including real-world application of the system. They aren't just software techs training end users, they seem to be end users that have become experts in the over functionality and capabilities of the system.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The on-line training is very good, and it is taught by the same people that do the live in-person training sessions. The difficult part of it is, asking questions about your specific company's nuances or special circumstances. I don't remember if you can access the on-line training sessions after you have taken them for reminders purposes, but if so that is a great asset.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I don't really know about the implementation, it was back in 1998 and I didn't start here until 2016. By the time I started here they had been running it for a number of years and most of the people that were here when it was implemented are no longer here, and the ones that are don't really have much to say about how the implementation went either bad or good.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Most of my experience has been with Epicor's Prophet 21. For most distribution verticals, Prophet 21 is the only way to go. The comparison I've drawn is this: Prophet 21 is like a ferrari. Epicor Eclipse is like a reliable donkey. Both get you from point A to point B but Prophet 21 is going to get you there much quicker and with the kind of insight into your business that will help you thrive.
Read full review
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
Scalability
I don't really know about the scalability. It's the same as it was when I started, I do know that you can buy more user licenses, but I think they come in packs of 5, which can be a problem if you only need 1 and will never use the other 4. But, again I'm not sure on that.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Reporting features allow tracking items trending downward which can glut inventory space and dollars if not adjusted
  • GMROI reports help analyze turn ratios and adjusted dollar values and margins of product lines.
  • Suggested Purchase Order features allowed controlled inventory purchases which avoid lost sales while managing overall dollars invested in an acquired product with the lowest freight costs possible.
Read full review
  • Positive impact in terms of global process alignment.
  • Positive impact in terms of a single system of truth and reporting.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of