TrustRadius

esChecker vs. Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
esChecker
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
esChecker: a MAST by eShard esChecker combines years of penetration testing experience with a dynamic engine simulating attack techniques. No source code is needed, only the app binary (Android apk or iOS ipa). It takes 30 minutes to find out how an app reacts against many hacking techniques, so that the user can now reserve pentest budget to in-depth vulnerability analyses. What is a MAST? Mobile Application Security Testing solutions implement security…N/A
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an automated, all-in-one mobile application (Android/iOS/Windows) pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. MobSF support mobile app binaries (APK, IPA & APPX) along with zipped source code and provides REST APIs for integration with CI/CD or DevSecOps pipeline. The Dynamic Analyzer helps you to perform runtime security assessment and interactive instrumented testing.N/A
Pricing
esCheckerMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
esCheckerMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
esCheckerMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Considered Both Products
esChecker

No answer on this topic

Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
FD
Francis de Castro
Business User Engagement Manager
Chose Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. …
Best Alternatives
esCheckerMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
esCheckerMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
esCheckerMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
MobSF is good for checking for vulnerabilities in your app. It will also give suggestions on how to address them. Another thing is can do is find code that may be incorrect. It is not, however, a substitute for a system that actually checks your code for proper use. It really is concentrated on security.
FD
Francis de Castro
Business User Engagement Manager
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Scan for vulnerabilities
  • Scan for bad coding
  • Give suggestions on fixes for security issues
FD
Francis de Castro
Business User Engagement Manager
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • The UI is not that user friendly
  • The documentation could be easier to understand
  • An easier method of deploying MobSF would be appreciated
FD
Francis de Castro
Business User Engagement Manager
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. One is free while the other is a paid solution (with several tiers). However, we use them together to get a more comprehensive scan.
FD
Francis de Castro
Business User Engagement Manager
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • It has allowed our apps to pass a security vetting requirement of a third party to deploy our app
  • We can see where we can improve on the development of our app
  • The deployment can take a while, especially with teams not familiar with the software
FD
Francis de Castro
Business User Engagement Manager
Read full review
ScreenShots

esChecker Screenshots

Screenshot of esChecker offers default preset campaigns, according to OWASP standards: MASVS L2+R, MASVS L2, MASVS L1+R and MASVS L1. Users can also choose to create custom campaign to match internal security policies.Screenshot of With its Record and Replay feature, esChecker allows users to browse deep in app screens to target critical user journeys. This ensures that the performed attacks are triggered on the right screens. After a testing session, users can play the video recording of a given test and see how the app reacted.Screenshot of After a full app test session, users are able to understand how strong an application is in: Application Reverse Engineering Protection, Application Misconfiguration and Application Vulnerabilities.Screenshot of The testing report guides the user through the OWASP MASVS to help understand where an application requires more work to be properly protected. This report can be used internally, or externally to show evidence of compliance.Screenshot of The app Defense Score can be used to and compare an app’ results. To help monitor the application’s security protections evolution, esChecker provides a centralized, and graphic overview of the test results.