Esker vs. Extensiv Order Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Esker
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Esker is a global cloud platform built to unlock strategic value for finance and customer service professionals and strengthen collaboration between companies by automating the cash conversion cycle. Esker’s mission is to build a foundation that promotes positive-sum growth, increased productivity, improved employee engagement, and greater trust between organizations.N/A
Extensiv Order Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Skubana, now from Extensiv, is billed as enterprise resource planning software built around eCommerce; primarily it offers inventory management and order fulfillment, with analytics built in.N/A
Pricing
EskerExtensiv Order Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EskerExtensiv Order Manager
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EskerExtensiv Order Manager
User Ratings
EskerExtensiv Order Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
EskerExtensiv Order Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
I would recommend Esker based on the automation of invoice sending - it is very nice to have a tool that not only stores all of the contact info, but sends the invoices out as well. The tracking feature is great to have to see if the submission was successful. I do think that overall it could be much more user-friendly, but once you know what you're doing, it is not hard software to use.
Read full review
PO management & inventory control is key. If you are in Operations & need a tool to house all of this data, Extensiv is straightforward and has the ability for customization.
Read full review
Pros
  • Everything is electronic and every manager receives an email each morning telling them how many invoices they need to approve.
  • It has completely removed paper form the Accounts payable process and automatically archives invoices for the mandatory period required by Inland Revenue.
  • For monthly reporting there is visibility over what has not yet been included in the accounts and staff can follow with the tardy managers.
Read full review
  • Warehouse/factory setup.
  • PO receipt process.
  • Inventory control; understanding stock levels across multiple warehouses.
Read full review
Cons
  • We can't enter credit memos in Esker. Need to enter in SAP and then link.
  • PO invoices that were trained to go into the PO bucket, route into the non-PO buckets.
  • Freight invoices that have had hundreds going into the non-PO bucket have a tendency to route to the PO-bucket because a PO number is referenced on page 7.
Read full review
  • Customizable fields ie: implementing a CRD (Cargo Ready Date) field would be great.
  • Easier/more direct template uploading for PO's.
Read full review
Usability
Esker does everything that it promises to do, but it is very hard to figure out. I am a very tech-savvy person, but I needed extensive training to be able to use the basic functions of Esker. Once you know what you're doing, it's not too hard, but I don't understand why they couldn't make it easier to use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
They have been very helpful and the online support site is awesome. They keep the site up to date with the latest changes and present challenges to keep learning the new updates to keep things entertaining. They are overall a great crew to work with
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We investigated Readsoft early in our exploration of upgrade options. We were on Esker DeliveryWare, but the UI for Readsoft, at the time, seemed to be a little convoluted and geared towards exception handling and required tiered users. Also, Readsoft was more cost prohibitive and did not have a solution for our faxing. Though, as I understand it, they may have since found a solution for this issue
Read full review
Extensiv > Anvyl because of the inventory control aspect. Anvyl is solid for PO placement, but after that, it doesn't offer inventory levels and the control needed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We now have reporting available down to the individual field level (changes, errors, etc) and can calculate cost to serve.
  • It replaced on-premise hardware with cloud SaaS that is more cost effective and risk adverse.
  • It is more intuitive; we can put new hires on order entry and experience less user errors. As a solution owner who fixes problems and answers questions, I don't find myself having to "think" about Esker and it has become a smaller part of my job now that end-users are more self-sufficient.
Read full review
  • PO management & Inventory control is utilized to its potential.
  • We are excited to see Extensiv grow its Analytics module and all the exporting features.
Read full review
ScreenShots