Esker vs. ProcurementExpress.com

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Esker
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Esker is a global cloud platform built to unlock strategic value for finance and customer service professionals and strengthen collaboration between companies by automating the cash conversion cycle. Esker’s mission is to build a foundation that promotes positive-sum growth, increased productivity, improved employee engagement, and greater trust between organizations.N/A
ProcurementExpress.com
Score 10.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
ProcurementExpress.com is designed for small to medium-sized companies to gain full control of purchasing. Team members raise requests against specific pre-defined budgets. Managers approve, decline, or comment on requests - straight from their inbox. Once approved, team members can purchase the requested item and attach all relevant documents for easy reporting and auditing. An iOS and Android app is included free of charge. 24/5 online chat support . A "full view" dashboard…
$30
per user, per month
Pricing
EskerProcurementExpress.com
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Simple plan
$30.00
per user, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EskerProcurementExpress.com
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EskerProcurementExpress.com
Considered Both Products
Esker
Chose Esker
I have listed a few that we considered but there were many more in the initial assessment, Esker was priced well and had the best user interface. Was really easy to use and the implementation process was well designed. It was a system that could handle a two tiered delegations …
Chose Esker
I don't recall the other three companies that we looked at. One major reason we went with Esker is because it is local.
Chose Esker
We investigated Readsoft early in our exploration of upgrade options. We were on Esker DeliveryWare, but the UI for Readsoft, at the time, seemed to be a little convoluted and geared towards exception handling and required tiered users. Also, ReadSoft was more cost prohibitive …
Chose Esker
Kofax is very similar to Esker in terms of functionality as well as ease of use. I feel that both programs work well, but neither is very user-friendly. Kofax is more expensive, which is why Esker wins.
Chose Esker
TermSync was a little more difficult to learn but has become much better in the end. Once the universal search bar feature was implemented, it became so much easier to navigate and find accounts.
ProcurementExpress.com
Chose ProcurementExpress.com
We did not have a program before this. I was not a part of the purchasing decision for this program. The setup in QuickBooks that we could have used was not as functionally useful as ProcurementExpress.com for our purposes, according to the team that did purchase the software.
Chose ProcurementExpress.com
We honestly haven't tried any other products. ProcurementExpress fulfilled our needs.
Chose ProcurementExpress.com
They are very easy to use together, as Procurement is just a tab click away while I'm working in the other program.
Chose ProcurementExpress.com
I was not the person to select ProcurementExpress but my company has been using it for all 5 years I have been here. We all love it and find it very easy to use and navigate. All 250 plus people use it and use it very often as we order on our own.
Best Alternatives
EskerProcurementExpress.com
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Precoro
Precoro
Score 2.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Tungsten Capture
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EskerProcurementExpress.com
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
EskerProcurementExpress.com
Likelihood to Recommend
I would recommend Esker based on the automation of invoice sending - it is very nice to have a tool that not only stores all of the contact info, but sends the invoices out as well. The tracking feature is great to have to see if the submission was successful. I do think that overall it could be much more user-friendly, but once you know what you're doing, it is not hard software to use.
Read full review
It's suited for SMEs looking to organize their purchasing process even in the absence of an in-house finance dept where people have a degree of autonomy in decision making on purchases Getting approvals can be slow at times, so if you have a very hierarchical company and the boss is never around to approve things, this will slow things down.
Read full review
Pros
  • Everything is electronic and every manager receives an email each morning telling them how many invoices they need to approve.
  • It has completely removed paper form the Accounts payable process and automatically archives invoices for the mandatory period required by Inland Revenue.
  • For monthly reporting there is visibility over what has not yet been included in the accounts and staff can follow with the tardy managers.
Read full review
  • The software is extremely easy to use and since I was a first time user I was able to load my PO's easily.
  • There are not a lot of things you need to go through before being able to work on the platform which makes it simple to use.
  • It saves me a lot of time by tracking my spent/income without me having to do any major calculations - Very accurate!
Read full review
Cons
  • We can't enter credit memos in Esker. Need to enter in SAP and then link.
  • PO invoices that were trained to go into the PO bucket, route into the non-PO buckets.
  • Freight invoices that have had hundreds going into the non-PO bucket have a tendency to route to the PO-bucket because a PO number is referenced on page 7.
Read full review
  • Creating reports.
  • Have options on the input section with more details.
  • Exclude the remaining budget section of the email sent with PDF of PO.
Read full review
Usability
Esker does everything that it promises to do, but it is very hard to figure out. I am a very tech-savvy person, but I needed extensive training to be able to use the basic functions of Esker. Once you know what you're doing, it's not too hard, but I don't understand why they couldn't make it easier to use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
They have been very helpful and the online support site is awesome. They keep the site up to date with the latest changes and present challenges to keep learning the new updates to keep things entertaining. They are overall a great crew to work with
Read full review
Great program for any small business in my opinion. I use it daily and recommend it for anyone who is having trouble with keeping track of outgoing purchase money. They make it easy for someone like me who is busy on all ends to have one less thing to worry about running a company.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We investigated Readsoft early in our exploration of upgrade options. We were on Esker DeliveryWare, but the UI for Readsoft, at the time, seemed to be a little convoluted and geared towards exception handling and required tiered users. Also, Readsoft was more cost prohibitive and did not have a solution for our faxing. Though, as I understand it, they may have since found a solution for this issue
Read full review
We did not have a program before this. I was not a part of the purchasing decision for this program. The setup in QuickBooks that we could have used was not as functionally useful as ProcurementExpress.com for our purposes, according to the team that did purchase the software.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We now have reporting available down to the individual field level (changes, errors, etc) and can calculate cost to serve.
  • It replaced on-premise hardware with cloud SaaS that is more cost effective and risk adverse.
  • It is more intuitive; we can put new hires on order entry and experience less user errors. As a solution owner who fixes problems and answers questions, I don't find myself having to "think" about Esker and it has become a smaller part of my job now that end-users are more self-sufficient.
Read full review
  • I think our CEO will be able to provide a good answer to this.
  • As a Creative Director, I focus on simply keeping projects on a budget, in an effective way.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ProcurementExpress.com Screenshots

Screenshot of Share purchase orders easily to colleagues and suppliersScreenshot of View PO history on demand.Screenshot of Get a brief overview of your company purchasing on a dashboard.Screenshot of Works great on all your devices - desktop, mobile and tablet.Screenshot of Easily share purchase orders with colleagues.Screenshot of Create purchase requests on the fly - even when you are out of coverage!