TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Evolve IP Virtual Desktop vs. Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Evolve IP Virtual Desktop

    N/AN/AEvolve IP’s Desktop Services are designed to meet the diverse needs of any organization by providing a unified desktop management solution for physical and virtual desktops alike – enabling IT departments to deliver the most appropriate desktop solution for each end user, while maintaining control through the cloud and improving end-user support. The Desktop Services include: Desktop Mangement (RMM) - Delivers point and click configuration management, patch management,…N/A

    Parallels RAS

    Score6.8 out of 10
    N/AParallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS, formerly 2X RAS), is application virtualization technology, billed as a solution to extend the life of legacy OS (like Windows XP) with its virtual desktop for any device. Maltese company 2X Software developed the technology, but was acquired by Parallels (in Seattle, WA) in February, 2015 to extend their cross-platform support solutions.

    $120

    per year per user

    Pricing
    Evolve IP Virtual DesktopParallels RAS
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Evolve IP Virtual DesktopParallels RAS
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Evolve IP Virtual DesktopParallels RAS
    Considered Both Products
    Evolve IP
    No answer on this topic
    Alludo
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Better overall
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Parallels Remote Application Server seems to be behind the offerings of both Amazon and Azure. Their product functions more as a traditional Windows Server application that just happens to run on the cloud or on-premise servers. Both Amazon and Azure's offerings are …
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Primary objective is save cost. Easy to configure policy and has more security
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    We have evaluated other similar products on the market and based on the cost, how the product will be implemented, and features and functions, we chose Parallels.
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Parallels were our preferred solution because of a more robust Client App solution instead of only an HTML5-based solution. This made it possible to make a more flexible solution. The use of shared drives, printers, and other hardware for example. It also made a more seamless …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Evolve IP Virtual DesktopParallels RAS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (151 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (21 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (28 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.5
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (129 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (10 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (4 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.5
    (3 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)