| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Evoq Content | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Evoq Content is a content management system within the Evoq business suite. Evoq Content is extensible with many modules that add caching, advanced content approval workflow, granular permissions, document management, mobile accessibility of content, web farm support, and an ecommerce engine. | N/A |
 Progress Sitefinity | Score6.8 out of 10 | N/A | Progress Sitefinity is a content management and customer analytics platform. It supports content management, tailored marketing, multi-channel management, and ecommerce sites. | N/A |
| Evoq Content | Progress Sitefinity | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Evoq Content | Progress Sitefinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Evoq Content Evoq is a deeper and more flexible product than other CMS solutions we’ve used. When trying to match a client to the CMS they need, Evoq was always in the conversation. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Progress Sitefinity Comparable Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Progress Sitefinity Sitefinity's interface is much more intuitive and easy to use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Progress Sitefinity The cost of Sitefinity compared to other enterprise level CMS systems along with their built-in functions makes this a one stop solution for most companies. We also have the ability to easily create other content types and tools. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Progress Sitefinity We mostly chose Sitefinity because we are current users of Telerik (Progress) development tools. When they purchased Sitefinity we decided to switch from our custom developed website to one hosted on a CMS. We have had some experience with DotNetNuke in the past and … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Progress Sitefinity We've used Sitecore in the past and the interface was very unintuitive and difficult to use. Since then we have experimented with DotNetNuke and Umbraco, but are not satisfied only being supported by a community of volunteers. Customers have requirements and Sitefinity is able … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Progress Sitefinity Umraco, SharePoint, DotNetNuke, Sitecore.
I prefer Sitefinity in almost every instance. Sitecore is more enterprise level but overkill for most clients. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Progress Sitefinity I originally started working in Sitefinity with another company because we were a .NET shop. I did not choose Sitefinity for my current company, but they chose me because they needed someone with Sitefinity experience. I would always choose Sitefinity over WordPress because I'm … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Progress Sitefinity Incentivized Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Evoq Content | Progress Sitefinity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Platform & Infrastructure |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web Content Creation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web Content Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evoq Content | Progress Sitefinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.8 | 7.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Usability | 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Availability | - | 8.2 |
| Performance | - | 5.5 |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 | 4.6 |
| Configurability | - | 5.5 |
| Product Scalability | - | 4.5 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 5.5 |
