Exabeam Fusion vs. IBM Verify

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Exabeam Fusion
Score 4.2 out of 10
N/A
Exabeam headquartered in San Mateo, Exabeam Fusion, a SIEM + XDR. The vendor states the modular Exabeam platform allows analysts to collect unlimited log data, use behavioral analytics to detect attacks, and automate incident response. The Exabeam platform can be deployed on-premise or from the cloud. Exabeam can also integrate information from the Exabeam Threat Intelligence Service, or into a third-party SIEM.N/A
IBM Verify
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Verify, formerly known as IBM Cloud Identity, is an identity-as-a-service (IDaaS) offering that aggregates dynamic user, device and environmental context to automate risk protection and continuously authenticate any user to any resource.N/A
Pricing
Exabeam FusionIBM Verify
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Exabeam FusionIBM Verify
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsSample Pricing Breakdown (NOTE: for competitive pricing per contract, please consult with your IBM Security Account Rep) Users: 5,000 SSO* -- USD 1.71 per user per month MFA* -- USD 1.71 per user per month Adaptive Access* -- USD 1.71 per user per month Lifecycle and provisioning** -- USD 2.01 per user per month Identity analytics** -- USD 2.13 per user per month * Single sign-on (SSO), multifactor authentication (MFA) and adaptive access pricing based on total active monthly users per use case. Costs decrease if users are active less than once per month. ** Lifecycle and provisioning and identity analytics pricing based on total users per use case.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Exabeam FusionIBM Verify
Considered Both Products
Exabeam Fusion

No answer on this topic

IBM Verify
Chose IBM Verify
We conducted a comparison study between IBM Verify and Okta as well as Duo Security before making our selection. IBM Verify emerged as the perfect fit because its superior capability to integrate with our current system environment surpassed competitor security solutions. IBM …
Chose IBM Verify
Owing to the general findings formulated in this paper, comparing Okta and Microsoft Entra ID to IBM Verify, the latter appears to be the only tool that delivers a number of features for integrating with legacy systems. However, since IBM Verify has the upper hand in terms of …
Chose IBM Verify
During our proof of concept and demonstrations, we were clearly able to see how much better the identity, access and authorisation features were compared to the competition. We were compelled to make a decision, not only on this, but also on the ease and simplicity of …
Chose IBM Verify
IBM Security Verify is a robust product which has all the features. Its advanced AI capabilities helps it make a superior product when compared to competition. The most important factor with IBM Security Verify is that it comes under the IBM umbrella which makes it more …
Chose IBM Verify
IBM Security Verify is better than its competitors because of its ease of use and implementation.
Chose IBM Verify
IBM Security Verify stacks up with Microsoft Entra ID better than SecurID due to categories in common such as, Self Service password resets, Multi-Factor Authentication, User Provision and Governance Tools, SSO, and IAM. SecurID not so much because it doesn't have that full …
Chose IBM Verify
IBM Security Verify was more effective and useful for our business as compared to 360 Total Security and Norton Small Business both. All or team that used the product had good success, my only complaint is that cost for IBM Security Verify was more expensive for a small …
Chose IBM Verify
For the feature set, Verify was by far the more attractive product. We use some other Fortinet systems, so naturally, we wanted to see what else was available outside of this ecosystem. Verify wasn't the cheapest solution, but it does provide a level of confidence that you are …
Chose IBM Verify
There are very few competitors in this space, and you don't have to look too much into this. If it gets your work done, you can add users and start using the software; it's not a project management software where you would have to evaluate for months on the go and then make a …
Chose IBM Verify
Security Verify is a great solution backed by IBM and has evolved over time to become one of the best access management applications on the market.
Chose IBM Verify
I believe that the decision for selecting IBM Security Verify was based on our IT technical analysis but also due to our trust that this provider would deploy a solution according to our needs and expectations. The free trial made it possible to test it and understand, at an …
Chose IBM Verify
I don't care for the IBM Security Verify. I find it old and clunky compared to newer programs that offer the same service. IBM was selected because we are a large organization, and we need the reassurances that only large (think Microsoft, alphabet, IBM, Dell, etc) can offer. …
Chose IBM Verify
We actually use the F5 load balancer instead of the ISAM for those functions. We did evaluate some similar Microsoft Azure offerings but did not select.
Chose IBM Verify
We evaluated Oracle Identity Manager and were ready to move ahead with the purchase plan, but then found that IBM addressed the needs of our company in a more robust fashion. The price was significantly higher, yet in the grand scheme of things, the safety of both our data and …
Chose IBM Verify
Compared to Okta, IBM Verify is easier to implement and more user-friendly for our employees. It provides strong security using multi-factor authentication and maintains easy settings. We chose IBM Verify because it met our needs without any significant development work.
Chose IBM Verify
Okta has good user experience for end users and setup process however IBM verify has a stronger capability for integration, auditing. Microsoft Entra integrates well within the Microsoft tech stack, easier for users to adopt due to familiar environment. Store scalability and …
Chose IBM Verify
These tools provided similar functionality in multi-factor authentication and identity security, but IBM Verify offered stronger enterprise integration, compliance alignment, and reliability for our needs.
Chose IBM Verify
Cheaper and more configurable to different clouds
Features
Exabeam FusionIBM Verify
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Exabeam Fusion
-
Ratings
IBM Verify
7.9
Ratings
2% below category average
ID-Management Access Control00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Password Management00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
ID Risk Management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Exabeam FusionIBM Verify
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

1Password
1Password
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 9.5 out of 10
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 9.5 out of 10
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Exabeam FusionIBM Verify
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Exabeam FusionIBM Verify
Likelihood to Recommend
As a SIEM tool for investigations, Exabeam is the best in class. The AI assigns numeric values to observed logs them presents high scores to the analyst in a simple dashboard. We can see what is a real threat and ignore so many false positives. Exabeam is the best SIEM was used from an alert fatigue perspective. The simple interface allows other teams not just InfoSec to utilize the tool; helpdesk for asset diagnoses, HR for staffing questions, etc.
Read full review
It is brilliant for use as an identity and access management tool and ensures the safeguarding of our systems and upholds data integrity as a consequence. It was very easy to set up and apart from a straightforward installation, we have found customisation and configuration easy. It was easy to deploy in the cloud after using it previously on premises.
Read full review
Pros
  • Simple graphical interface
  • Plan text searching, no need to know another coding language
  • Very very fast response
  • All saved logs up to 7 years instantly searchable
  • Not cold or frozen buckets for years old logs
Read full review
  • MFA authentication - you can verify the users using the mobile app.
  • Password repository - We don't have to remember passwords for each app; we only need one for IBM security, which then authenticates us and lets us access the app.
  • Sharing access to new users, we just create a new user in IBM and it authenticates and takes care of the user.
Read full review
Cons
  • Improvements on top of Lucene/KQL to add more search functions.
  • Stability of the overall deployment.
  • Ability to run version upgrades quicker and without data ingestion problems afterward.
  • More documentation and examples about the API functionality available.
Read full review
  • It was a bit overwhelming to implement and was neither obvious nor user-friendly.
  • While the product is quite powerful, the documentation left something to be desired if one wants to fully appreciate its capabilities.
  • The cost was almost prohibitive, but it was the only product we could find that addressed all the needs of our organization in one place.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It works flawlessly, i have never faced any major issues with this. It has all the features such as Iam and security management. I think its a good investment and the benefits we reap from this software are worth the price.
Read full review
Usability
The system is set up to run out of the box. It has a simple easy to understand the graphical interface. Exabeam designed its SIEM from the ground up to be user-friendly and intuitive. They designed it to use plain text searches so no special training is needed. You do NOT have to learn another programming language and keep up with it daily to be proficient and productive with the tool, unlike all other SIEMs we have used before. Did I mention we love Exabeam?
Read full review
While setup and implementation takes work and time, the flexibility and possibilities make up for that in the long run. This is not a product you can just install and run, but if you design and implement your ruleset well, it will save you a lot of work afterwards. Just make sure that the systems you want to use it for have an existing and proven connector.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Throughout the system testing we conducted, we never encountered an issue that wasn't easily solvable. We did find some of the documentation confusing at times, but we overcame this quickly with some speedy support assistance. Implementation into production was a lot smoother following the testing we conducted.
Read full review
Support Rating
The engineers working to support Exabeam are very professional and competent. They always arrive prepared for troubleshooting meetings and provide helpful input to resolve most issues without requiring excessive escalation whenever possible. Their support team is good at promptly providing parsers that can be used to enhance the product's functionality and ensure fields are all populated.
Read full review
The support team has always been the primary consultation base when we are faced by performance problems. From the deployment stage the team has managed to monitor the operation lifecycle and give best insights based on their observation. It works 24/7 to enhance productive service delivery to clients. The IBM Security Verify Support team has been the main player in the successful performance of this software.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We conducted a comparison study between IBM Verify and Okta as well as Duo Security before making our selection. IBM Verify emerged as the perfect fit because its superior capability to integrate with our current system environment surpassed competitor security solutions. IBM Verify demonstrated superior reliability through its enterprise-class scalability and fully transparent auditing mechanisms.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Reduced time to triage alerts.
  • Reduced number of alerts which need escalation to senior tiers.
  • The ability for analysts to quickly run playbooks for additional information and enrichment.
  • Ability to retain data for longer periods for forensics purposes.
  • Improved search performance compared with other SIEM solutions.
Read full review
  • Providing an additional layer of authentication security, IBM Security Verify helps protect customer data, reduce the risk of fraud, and improve the customer experience.
  • Lead to increased customer loyalty, improved customer retention, and better overall customer satisfaction.
  • Reduce the cost of fraud prevention, thereby improving the bottom line.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Verify Screenshots

Screenshot of IBM Verify (for CIAM) - Privacy and ConsentScreenshot of IBM Verify - Custom Application TemplateScreenshot of IBM Verify - Select Application TypeScreenshot of IBM Verify - Privacy Policy