ExaVault Cloud MFT vs. Kiteworks

ExaVault Cloud MFT

Kiteworks

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
ExaVault Cloud MFT	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	ExaVault is a business file transfer and secure FTP hosting service from the company of the same name in Oakland. The vendor aims to help businesses send and receive large files, and offer both a slick, modern web-based interface as well as traditional FTP & SFTP.	N/A
Kiteworks	Score 9.5 out of 10	N/A	Kiteworks empowers organizations to manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance. With on-premise, private cloud, hybrid and FedRAMP deployment…	$15 per user/month

Pricing

ExaVault Cloud MFT

Kiteworks

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Business: $15
per user/month
Enterprise: Custom Pricing

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
ExaVault Cloud MFT	Kiteworks
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

ExaVault offers plans that are right sized for your business with the features you need. Start with a free trial! See our pricing page for details.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	ExaVault Cloud MFT	Kiteworks
Considered Both Products	ExaVault Cloud MFT No answer on this topic	Kiteworks Verified User Anonymous Chose Kiteworks The main reason for selecting Kiteworks is that when sharing files with multiple customers, each customer has no idea who the other customers are. To do that in Teams would require users to create a private team for each customer, which would be very [time-consuming]. Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	ExaVault Cloud MFT	Kiteworks
Small Businesses	DataMotion Score 9.3 out of 10	SugarSync Score 5.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	DataMotion Score 9.3 out of 10	M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises	Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT Score 9.7 out of 10	M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	ExaVault Cloud MFT	Kiteworks
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.5 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	ExaVault Cloud MFT	Kiteworks
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	We are sending some pools securely via Kiteworks. Sharing and receiving secure files from 3rd party users and tracking files are very simple. Kiteworks solved compliance and security issues. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Microsoft Office Plugins Desktop Synchronization Mobile Ability Group chat File Filtering Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Encrypting our files appears to be less than 100% complete Software updates cannot be scheduled to take place automatically like their old product Detailed activity logging is not available to administrators. You must submit the logs to Accellion for analysis. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	The main reason for selecting Kiteworks is that when sharing files with multiple customers, each customer has no idea who the other customers are. To do that in Teams would require users to create a private team for each customer, which would be very [time-consuming]. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	We have tried to move to other products but our users will have nothing of that. We migrated from the Accellion MFT product with relative ease. We have less than 100 users, using over 1.5 TB of space, so it's a very popular product. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	ExaVault Cloud MFT Screenshots	Kiteworks Screenshots