EXTENSIV Integration Manager vs. Mule ESB

EXTENSIV Integration Manager

Mule ESB

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
EXTENSIV Integration Manager	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	EXTENSIV Integration Manager (formerly CartRover) is used to automate and streamline online orders from a single platform, with the goal of allowing for the seamless integration of multiple ecommerce platforms and marketplaces.	$39 per month
Mule ESB	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	Mule ESB, from Mulesoft, is an open source middleware solution.	N/A

Pricing

EXTENSIV Integration Manager

Mule ESB

Editions & Modules

Merchant: $39
per month
EDI Merchant: $99
per month
3PL: $99
per month
Master Account: $199
per month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
EXTENSIV Integration Manager	Mule ESB
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

- Standard Order Sources $15/mo - Premium Order Sources $30/mo - Addt'l EDI Order Sources $49/mo

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	EXTENSIV Integration Manager	Mule ESB
Considered Both Products	EXTENSIV Integration Manager No answer on this topic	Mule ESB Verified User Anonymous Chose Mule ESB Hands down, Mule is more cost-effective than Informatica, either on-prem or cloud, and the value only goes up form there. Reusability and ease of creation makes in-house training simple and the end result is we leverage Mule for much more than what we initially considered it … Incentivized Helpful? Deepak Kushwaha Tech Arch Sr. Analyst Chose Mule ESB I have worked with Oracle SOA Suite and I think if you have APIs with most of the integration with databases (majorly Oracle DB) then you should use Oracle SOA Suite instead of Mule. Oracle SOA Suite is most suitable to call most of the DB objects (i.e. procedures , functions, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Mule ESB It is a great product, just very expensive and did not have the connectors. For larger companies it works well and is very reliable, but it requires special skills and support staff to manage the performance and scaling attributes. Both tools can do the job, it just depends … Incentivized Helpful? KamaL Vachiravel Mule ESB, API and CloudHub Integration Lead Chose Mule ESB It doesn't have API . We have to go for another API manager. But in Mule, it has both API manager and ESB Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	EXTENSIV Integration Manager	Mule ESB
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	Boomi Score 8.9 out of 10	Anypoint Platform Score 7.8 out of 10
Enterprises	TIBCO B2B Integration Solution Score 8.0 out of 10	Anypoint Platform Score 7.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	EXTENSIV Integration Manager	Mule ESB
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.8 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	EXTENSIV Integration Manager	Mule ESB
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	Well Suited for: REST APIs. Rapid API Development. Most suitable for integration with SFDC. Batch processing. Parallel processing. Less appropriate for: Integration with Database. Exposing SOAP services. Small organizations, because it is super costly. Incentivized Deepak Kushwaha Tech Arch Sr. Analyst Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	As an ESB it provides great flexibility to add/remove systems in the integration easily. Highly scalable. Supports any kind of system to be integrated, Supports Java. Lightweight. Incentivized Ankit Goyal Technical Consultant Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Logging the Database query in production with out changing the log4j level Incentivized KamaL Vachiravel Mule ESB, API and CloudHub Integration Lead Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Hands down, Mule is more cost-effective than Informatica, either on-prem or cloud, and the value only goes up form there. Reusability and ease of creation makes in-house training simple and the end result is we leverage Mule for much more than what we initially considered it for. Having used Oracle and TIBCO before as well, I find they are the tools of yesterday, not able to keep up in terms of functionality or price. Jitterbit would be a more relevant comparison, but Mule won out in the bake-off we did between them. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Created a means to have a synergy with developers - quickly made us productive Ease of integration with Mule connectors - quicker releases Initial configuration was a challenge. Would have been more challenging without Mule Support Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots