TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Extreme Wireless Access Points

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Extreme Wireless Access Points

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AExtreme Networks' Wireless Access Points (or ExtremeWireless) are designed to provide performance in the most demanding environments with the latest Wi-Fi technologies including 6 GHz, OFDMA, MU-MIMO, and software-defined dual 6 GHz radios.N/A
    Pricing
    Extreme Wireless Access Points
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Extreme Wireless Access Points
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Extreme Wireless Access Points
    Considered Both Products
    Extreme Networks
    Chose Extreme Wireless Access Points
    Had actuall customer support and installation assistance. Ubiquity appears to have little to none.
    Incentivized
    Chose Extreme Wireless Access Points
    sub tier, but still a great product at a price point lower that the ideal vendor of choice
    Incentivized
    Chose Extreme Wireless Access Points
    Aerohive wireless stacks up well with other vendors listed when it comes to centralized management. Being one of the first vendors to offer web-based management, I feel that they had the lead in that area, but lost it to the likes of Meraki and other solutions.
    Incentivized
    Chose Extreme Wireless Access Points
    It was a product that fit our business needs so we selected Aerohive based on cost, product functionality, and performance.
    Incentivized
    Chose Extreme Wireless Access Points
    The Aerohive wireless devices are comparable to Cisco's wireless solution, in regard to performance, features, and management.
    But the cost of utilizing Cisco Wireless Access Points versus using the Aerohive access points is staggering. Since our wireless access points do not …
    Incentivized
    Chose Extreme Wireless Access Points
    Aerohive is an amazing product. Cisco wasn't able to stack up when it comes to controller redundancy, backup, etc. No need to have special software to just have a secondary controller... which drives down the cost.
    Incentivized
    Chose Extreme Wireless Access Points
    Aerohive's only meaningful competitor is Meraki; I'd say Aerohive/Meraki is 6 in one hand, half dozen in the other. You honestly can't go wrong with either, but I do not regret choosing Aerohive!
    Incentivized
    Chose Extreme Wireless Access Points
    I've used both Aruba and Cisco (traditional, not Meraki) for wireless, and each have their own strengths. Aruba offers a lot of feature functionality, though the interface is difficult and confusing to use (this was ~4 years ago). Cisco wireless is fairly straightforward to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Extreme Wireless Access Points
    We are running Ubiquiti APs for a separate network need in one of our buildings - which we are also happy with. But the difference between Ubiquiti and ExtremeWireless is vast - I cannot find most of the settings I'm used to seeing with ExtremeWireless in the Ubiquiti GUI. That …
    Incentivized
    Chose Extreme Wireless Access Points
    It's been a few years since I evaluated other wireless access points from other manufacturers. However, from the different webinars I have seen of their competitors, I believe Extreme Wireless Access Points is just as good as HP Aruba access points, Meraki, etc.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Extreme Wireless Access Points
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)