ExtremeXOS is a modular network operating system used for Extreme Networks' devices. The solution aims to support highly available, extensible, high-performance networks. The vendor states ExtremeXOS high availability architecture with EAPS protocol helps reduce network downtime for business continuity and access to mission-critical applications such as CRM, data warehouses and VoIP for carrier and voice grade networks.
N/A
HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
ArubaOS is the network operating system from Aruba Networks, an HPE company. ArubaOS includes AirMatch and ClientMatch, capabilities that monitor and optimize Wi-Fi power, channels, connections and bandwidth across the entire wireless network to improve user experience. Users can manage up to 10,000 APs, cluster up to 12 controllers, and segment traffic from one AP to multiple controllers with MultiZone.
N/A
Pricing
ExtremeXOS
HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ExtremeXOS
HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ExtremeXOS
HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Considered Both Products
ExtremeXOS
No answer on this topic
HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Aruba does quite a good job with GUI configuration, especially with AOS 8 - something that Cisco struggles with (maybe they came up with something new now). Aruba can also easily scale. While not on the same level, Ubiquiti has a good GUI but is lacking a good standard …
Aruba Wireless works quite well and is stable for enterprise. Once it's running, it works. Once you have it set up, you don't normally need to go in and make changes. Aruba is particularly good on pushing clients to use 5ghz (they say they use some kind of a proprietary algorithm). It may not be appropriate for smaller businesses due to cost and complexity
Aruba does quite a good job with GUI configuration, especially with AOS 8 - something that Cisco struggles with (maybe they came up with something new now). Aruba can also easily scale. While not on the same level, Ubiquiti has a good GUI but is lacking a good standard controller - users have to stand their own.