Aviatrix vs. F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aviatrix
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Aviatrix aims to bring multi-cloud networking, security, and operational visibility capabilities that enterprises customers require. Aviatrix software leverages public cloud provider APIs to interact with and directly program native cloud networking constructs, abstracting the unique complexities of each cloud to form one network data plane, and adds advanced networking and security features.N/A
F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Securely connects distributed apps and services across public cloud, on-premises, and edge environments. Utilizing Infrastructure as Code, App Connect provisions resources and maintain uniform policies across multiple sites.N/A
Pricing
AviatrixF5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AviatrixF5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AviatrixF5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
Considered Both Products
Aviatrix
Chose Aviatrix
We initially tried using the native routing funcitons in AWS (transit gateway) and in Azure (virtual network). While those native options worked, it became difficult to opeate when we tried to impose security inspection on the routing traffic. This leads us to the Aviatrix …
F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
The easy of deploy
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
-F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect provides more granular security policies with features like DOS, WAF etc and others lack
-F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect provides high performance global network and other rely on public internet and impact is latency and it gives F5 …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
It's pretty clear that these two are fine within a single ecosystem but fall short when the architecture spans more than one cloud vendor.
Best Alternatives
AviatrixF5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 7.6 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 7.6 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AviatrixF5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AviatrixF5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
Definitely use aAviatrix Cloud Network Platform if you are on multiple clouds like AWS, GCP or Azure. Or if you have multiple environments in one of them. Also if you have on-prem infrastructure that you need connected via VPN tunnel to the cloud. As far as I know, Aviatrix Cloud Network Platform is the only one using multiprocessing for those to reach high speeds.
Read full review
I thought F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect worked great to bridge the gap between our gcp environment and on prem. We were lacking in cloud funtionality for native load balancers but XC really connected the dots. We would most likely need a hybrid environment until the irules functionality improves for a few of our apps but most could be migrated over the XC.
Read full review
Pros
  • With a few very easy steps to establish routing between AWS VPC
  • Easy procedures to establish site to site VPN connection with external parties.
  • Provide network access control on routing traffic using its own build-in firewall inspection or directing traffic to 3rd party NGFW for full stack inspection.
Read full review
  • Ease of use - standing up a new site took very little time, less then an hour.
  • Connecting the dots - the ease at standing up a load balancer and advertising it on CEs was simple and straight forward. Once you get familiar with the field layout it's very comparable to BIG-IP
Read full review
Cons
  • It lacks of ways to admin-down an established site to site VPN connections is one of the short coming.
  • In network traffic inspection, it lacks options to customize the IPS function is another short coming.
  • While the product allows lots of email alerting options, it lacks ways to customize the alerting email messages and ways to suppress alert flooding.
Read full review
  • More of a unified experience as Gartner released their latest sort of sassy trends. A lot of consumers are looking at a more unified experience and that's the sort of compilation of both management and data planes into a single things like single UI, easier management experience for the corporations.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
At this point it has become too focal to our operations. An entire department could collapse if we dropped it now or in the near future. My experiences as mentioned in the previous questions tell of its gravity
Read full review
Usability
The core function of the product works very well. It really makes network traffic management easy in public clound, as well as crossing different public and private cloud platform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
No answers on this topic
From what we have been able to test load/responsiveness is quick and when we've tested out reporting and troubleshooting modules they have pulled the correct information in quick timeframes. We haven't been able to test out any software integration with Splunk of other software on our system since we are still in early POC stages but from what we've been told we should be able to implement that in our environment
Read full review
Support Rating
Very responsive and very strong technical skill even on the first teir support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We initially tried using the native routing funcitons in AWS (transit gateway) and in Azure (virtual network). While those native options worked, it became difficult to opeate when we tried to impose security inspection on the routing traffic. This leads us to the Aviatrix solution.
Read full review
-F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect provides more granular security policies with features like DOS, WAF etc and others lack -F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect provides high performance global network and other rely on public internet and impact is latency and it gives F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect a better user experience
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Reduce labor hours for network admin to manage public clound network routing policy.
  • Build-in security features may be good enough for small/medium size companies, and thus saving money from full funciton NGFW solution.
  • The Cost-IQ feature enable one to capture traffic volume of each VPC. This provides one way for the enterprise to perform cost charge back to various business funcitons at the VPC level.
Read full review
  • Inconsistent policies and procedures and now its all seem to be sorted and now requires less support
  • Deployment cycle time was reduced and achieves a faster adoption of newly added contents
  • Saved migration cost and more gave durability to the existing setup
Read full review
ScreenShots

F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of