F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect vs. Microsoft BizTalk Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Securely connects distributed apps and services across public cloud, on-premises, and edge environments. Utilizing Infrastructure as Code, App Connect provisions resources and maintain uniform policies across multiple sites.N/A
Microsoft BizTalk
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
F5 Distributed Cloud App ConnectMicrosoft BizTalk Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 Distributed Cloud App ConnectMicrosoft BizTalk
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 Distributed Cloud App ConnectMicrosoft BizTalk Server
Considered Both Products
F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
The easy of deploy
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
-F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect provides more granular security policies with features like DOS, WAF etc and others lack
-F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect provides high performance global network and other rely on public internet and impact is latency and it gives F5 …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect
It's pretty clear that these two are fine within a single ecosystem but fall short when the architecture spans more than one cloud vendor.
Microsoft BizTalk
Chose Microsoft BizTalk
We used BizTalk Server as we had all other integrating applications developed on .Net and using Microsoft development environment. Kafka is best if integration is between non-Microsoft applications. We had few adapters developed using Microsoft .Net framework. BizTalk is well …
Chose Microsoft BizTalk
Microsoft BizTalk was chosen as the integration hub many years ago. It is still in use in a number of places in the organization however we are no longer developing specifically for this product in mind. We now develop in a number of places and if Microsoft BizTalk is the …
Chose Microsoft BizTalk
Cordis is a Dutch product but it is too expensive.
Chose Microsoft BizTalk
We did look at Jitterbit dataloader from Salesforce.com. Jitterbit seems like a pretty decent solution if you are doing a lot of uploads into Salesforce.com. However, its not nearly as flexible as Microsoft Biztalk is. Biztalk allows you to create any type of custom solution …
Chose Microsoft BizTalk
BizTalk was selected here mainly because it is easy to integrate to a .NET application (most of them are Web Service, WCF SOAP, WCF REST and Web API) and many backend databases are Microsoft SQL Server. Another benefit is that the monitoring job is easy to set up and centralize …
Best Alternatives
F5 Distributed Cloud App ConnectMicrosoft BizTalk Server
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Boomi
Boomi
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 Distributed Cloud App ConnectMicrosoft BizTalk Server
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 Distributed Cloud App ConnectMicrosoft BizTalk Server
Likelihood to Recommend
I thought F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect worked great to bridge the gap between our gcp environment and on prem. We were lacking in cloud funtionality for native load balancers but XC really connected the dots. We would most likely need a hybrid environment until the irules functionality improves for a few of our apps but most could be migrated over the XC.
Read full review
It is perfectly suited if some heavy operation needs to be automated where jobs can be queued up. Scalable app which is required to develop in a lesser time frame. Good for when users should be able to change rules more frequently without any downtime, like promotions. The server is well proven in the market. BizTalk server is the best fit if all other integration adapters are developed using Microsoft applications and if all applications are meant to be processed on a Windows environment.
Read full review
Pros
  • Ease of use - standing up a new site took very little time, less then an hour.
  • Connecting the dots - the ease at standing up a load balancer and advertising it on CEs was simple and straight forward. Once you get familiar with the field layout it's very comparable to BIG-IP
Read full review
  • BizTalk uses Microsoft Visual Studio as the IDE (integrated development environment) tool, and it's very easy to use.
  • The orchestration engine of BizTalk addresses resource issue very well for long-running business processes by dehydrating and rehydrating orchestration instances.
  • BizTalk is very easy to integrate if the development is mainly on the Microsoft software family.
Read full review
Cons
  • More of a unified experience as Gartner released their latest sort of sassy trends. A lot of consumers are looking at a more unified experience and that's the sort of compilation of both management and data planes into a single things like single UI, easier management experience for the corporations.
Read full review
  • BizTalk needs to be better at tracking down errors after the fact. Input files by default get deleted after processing successfully, unless you specifically specify that they don't. This can be an issue where you need to see what the input file contained, since you may have errors showing up in your target platform, in our case this was SAP.
  • BizTalk logging needs improved. It needs to be able to log the content of the messages it sends and receives. It would be good if the log had a link to the input and output files.
  • BizTalk needs to allow a simple way to preserve the input and output files for debugging purposes. A master setting on the orchestration would be helpful for this.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
At this point it has become too focal to our operations. An entire department could collapse if we dropped it now or in the near future. My experiences as mentioned in the previous questions tell of its gravity
Read full review
BizTalk will always be required at this hospital.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Microsoft BizTalk is not an intuitive product. It requires many hours of looking through the settings to achieve what you need. Using 3rd party DLLs is a nightmare as you are forced to register them in the GAC of the server and this process is quite cumbersome just to use a DLL.
Read full review
Performance
From what we have been able to test load/responsiveness is quick and when we've tested out reporting and troubleshooting modules they have pulled the correct information in quick timeframes. We haven't been able to test out any software integration with Splunk of other software on our system since we are still in early POC stages but from what we've been told we should be able to implement that in our environment
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
BizTalk Server has been supported for more than 15 years. It is well proven in the market. Microsoft has provided excellent support with technical issues.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Make sure you have everybody and all depts. On board during testing on test server.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
-F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect provides more granular security policies with features like DOS, WAF etc and others lack -F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect provides high performance global network and other rely on public internet and impact is latency and it gives F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect a better user experience
Read full review
We did look at Jitterbit dataloader from Salesforce.com. Jitterbit seems like a pretty decent solution if you are doing a lot of uploads into Salesforce.com. However, its not nearly as flexible as Microsoft Biztalk is. Biztalk allows you to create any type of custom solution you wish, whereas Jitterbit is much more limited.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Inconsistent policies and procedures and now its all seem to be sorted and now requires less support
  • Deployment cycle time was reduced and achieves a faster adoption of newly added contents
  • Saved migration cost and more gave durability to the existing setup
Read full review
  • Microsoft BizTalk is more of a neutral ground as its [pricey] but it does do what it says
  • Microsoft BizTalk requires a much larger team of developers and server ops to run
  • Microsoft BizTalk can be pricey depending on your agreement
Read full review
ScreenShots

F5 Distributed Cloud App Connect Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of