TrustRadius

FigJam vs. GatherContent

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FigJam
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
FigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.
$36
per year per editor
GatherContent
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
GatherContent headquartered in London offers their content operations, collaboration and governance platform for enterprises.N/A
Pricing
FigJamGatherContent
Editions & Modules
FigJam Professional
$36
per year per editor
FigJam Organization
$60
per year per editor
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FigJamGatherContent
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FigJamGatherContent
Considered Both Products
FigJam
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose FigJam
It is similar, but it provides more usable solutions for brainstorming sessions and presentation purposes. Now empowered with AI and some new cool stuff, it may be the most dangerous competitor to FigJam. However, it will win the race if FigJam is more responsive and gets more …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose FigJam
FigJam works best in pair with Figma, as it allows you to keep track of your project in one place, supporting all phases of the process. The functionality is more intuitive, quick, and efficient. Visually, I also prefer it more —it’s more enjoyable and playful, making the …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose FigJam
Microsoft Whiteboards are better, in my opinion, but not friendly with Figma files (can't export layered assets, raster only). Better in the sense that the drawing and and marker tools felt more natural and the AI features are just better, like auto-shapes, vs. FigJam's …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose FigJam
Positive: FigJam is cheaper than Miro and allows connecting with FigJam, where we design our user interfaces. FigJam is more complete and visually appealing than draw.io, although draw.io is free. FigJam allows calls, which both competitors do not. Negative: Miro has …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose FigJam
If Sketch was on Windows with an app on par with their Mac app, I would never even look at FigJam. Sketch has local work sorted, accessible and scaleable, good collaborative features, and accessibility features, too. It feels modern and polished, with actual files you can …
RL
Rogelio Leal
UX/UI Designer
Chose FigJam
I feel like Figjam is great at at what it does. It provides a great overall place to be able to use a virtual whiteboard and help teams collaborate. Especially remote teams. It actually does it better than others. There are some tools such as Invision Freehand that at the …
GatherContent

No answer on this topic

Features
FigJamGatherContent
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
FigJam
-
Ratings
GatherContent
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
FigJam
-
Ratings
GatherContent
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
API00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
FigJam
-
Ratings
GatherContent
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
FigJam
-
Ratings
GatherContent
8.7
Ratings
17% above category average
SEO support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FigJamGatherContent
Small Businesses
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 8.5 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FigJamGatherContent
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FigJamGatherContent
Likelihood to Recommend
FigJam is perfect for the early stages of a project, where every member from cross-functional teams can participate, because it’s intuitive and has a very low entry barrier.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
We create and manage content for various client's websites. The customizable workflows, assignments and user roles help us keep everyone accountable to deadlines. It is transparent, collaborative, and more efficient for all.
Mirzet Kadric | TrustRadius Reviewer
Mirzet Kadric
Vice President
Read full review
Pros
  • One file, auto updated, no need to get latest
  • Easy to preview
  • Lack of client is benefit to some (not me)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Easy to navigate interface.
  • Customizable workflow.
  • Set up project templates for recurring projects.
Mirzet Kadric | TrustRadius Reviewer
Mirzet Kadric
Vice President
Read full review
Cons
  • love to see it kept feature light ... already seeing the little creeping features like timing clocks, AI help, etc ...
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Getting emails for every single change is really annoying.
  • It seems pretty easy, but I suggest you take time to train anyone who will be working on it.
  • API integrations could be better as it doesn't work 100% of the time.
  • Layouts created are static and you can not move the order.
Mirzet Kadric | TrustRadius Reviewer
Mirzet Kadric
Vice President
Read full review
Usability
I don't use it often, because the organization I work in uses a different environment on a commo basis. This is rather used between the designers, who prototype the solutions in Figma - they just have it as a workbook/notebook for their ideas. However, if those need to be shared with stakeholders or other organization members, the designers are expected to use a different environment.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It is similar, but it provides more usable solutions for brainstorming sessions and presentation purposes. Now empowered with AI and some new cool stuff, it may be the most dangerous competitor to FigJam. However, it will win the race if FigJam is more responsive and gets more attached to Figma, where the prototyping takes place.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It helps us conduct design tests faster, saving designers time specially because its easy to interact with FigJam
  • It helps discuss ideas faster
  • It helps us share ideas with partners more effectively
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Accountability to deadlines and roles.
  • Less emails and less multiple documents.
  • Large scale content management for new websites.
Mirzet Kadric | TrustRadius Reviewer
Mirzet Kadric
Vice President
Read full review
ScreenShots