TrustRadius

FigJam vs. Doceri, by SP Controls

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FigJam
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
FigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.
$36
per year per editor
Doceri
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
SP Controls headquartered in South San Francisco offers Doceri, which they present as an interactive whiteboard and screencast recorder with sophisticated tools for hand-drawn graphics and built-in remote desktop control with versions for iPad, and Windows devices.
$30
per license
Pricing
FigJamDoceri, by SP Controls
Editions & Modules
FigJam Professional
$36
per year per editor
FigJam Organization
$60
per year per editor
Doceri Desktop License
$30
per license
The Doceri Certified Educator Professional Development Course
$30
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FigJamDoceri
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FigJamDoceri, by SP Controls
Considered Both Products
FigJam
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose FigJam
It is similar, but it provides more usable solutions for brainstorming sessions and presentation purposes. Now empowered with AI and some new cool stuff, it may be the most dangerous competitor to FigJam. However, it will win the race if FigJam is more responsive and gets more …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose FigJam
FigJam works best in pair with Figma, as it allows you to keep track of your project in one place, supporting all phases of the process. The functionality is more intuitive, quick, and efficient. Visually, I also prefer it more —it’s more enjoyable and playful, making the …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose FigJam
Microsoft Whiteboards are better, in my opinion, but not friendly with Figma files (can't export layered assets, raster only). Better in the sense that the drawing and and marker tools felt more natural and the AI features are just better, like auto-shapes, vs. FigJam's …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose FigJam
Positive: FigJam is cheaper than Miro and allows connecting with FigJam, where we design our user interfaces. FigJam is more complete and visually appealing than draw.io, although draw.io is free. FigJam allows calls, which both competitors do not. Negative: Miro has …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose FigJam
If Sketch was on Windows with an app on par with their Mac app, I would never even look at FigJam. Sketch has local work sorted, accessible and scaleable, good collaborative features, and accessibility features, too. It feels modern and polished, with actual files you can …
RL
Rogelio Leal
UX/UI Designer
Chose FigJam
I feel like Figjam is great at at what it does. It provides a great overall place to be able to use a virtual whiteboard and help teams collaborate. Especially remote teams. It actually does it better than others. There are some tools such as Invision Freehand that at the …
Doceri

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
FigJamDoceri, by SP Controls
Small Businesses
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 8.5 out of 10
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FigJamDoceri, by SP Controls
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FigJamDoceri, by SP Controls
Likelihood to Recommend
FigJam is perfect for the early stages of a project, where every member from cross-functional teams can participate, because it’s intuitive and has a very low entry barrier.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • One file, auto updated, no need to get latest
  • Easy to preview
  • Lack of client is benefit to some (not me)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • love to see it kept feature light ... already seeing the little creeping features like timing clocks, AI help, etc ...
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I don't use it often, because the organization I work in uses a different environment on a commo basis. This is rather used between the designers, who prototype the solutions in Figma - they just have it as a workbook/notebook for their ideas. However, if those need to be shared with stakeholders or other organization members, the designers are expected to use a different environment.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It is similar, but it provides more usable solutions for brainstorming sessions and presentation purposes. Now empowered with AI and some new cool stuff, it may be the most dangerous competitor to FigJam. However, it will win the race if FigJam is more responsive and gets more attached to Figma, where the prototyping takes place.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It helps us conduct design tests faster, saving designers time specially because its easy to interact with FigJam
  • It helps discuss ideas faster
  • It helps us share ideas with partners more effectively
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots