Figma vs. InVision

Figma

1,380 Reviews and Ratings

InVision

215 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Figma	Score8.9 out of 10	N/A	Figma, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their collaborative design and prototyping application to support digital product and UI development.	$15 per month per editor
InVision	Score5.7 out of 10	N/A	InVision is a collaborative design and prototyping platform with features such as freehand drafting mode and interactive mockups, collaboration, idea management, user testing, and integration with Slack and other collaboration tools. According to the vendor, 1 million designers are using the free version.	$0

Pricing

Figma

InVision

Professional: $144
per year
Organization: $540
per year
Starter: Free

Free: $0
Pro: $7.75
per user/per month
Enterprise: Contact Sales

Pricing Offerings
Figma	InVision
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Figma	InVision
Considered Both Products	Figma Braxton Bragg VP of Growth in Product Management at Revel.xyz (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Figma InVision was the dominant product (not that long ago, about 6-8 years) before Figma came on the scene. The ability to easily share Figma designs via link to colleagues who did not yet have Figma accounts was a key unlock that allowed it to quickly grow, because the more people … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma InVision was much better when it came to building and interacting with prototypes while Miro and Mural are much better visualization and collaboration tools. But from a pure design and development perspective Figma has been the best I have used and the one preferred by all … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma Figma has become more expensive recently, but licenses and users are very easy to manage in comparison to the other tools. We've had a lot of positive Feedback from our designers after we migrated from InVision to Figma. On top of that, most of our product owner also preferred … Incentivized Helpful? Abhimanyu Tiwari UX Research Lead in Research & Development at ADP (Computer Software, 10,001+ employees) Chose Figma I will be specific here - With Adobe XD it was very difficult to prototype, it was also very complicated to learn. With Sketch - We had to use InVision for prototype and share and there were limited feature were available compared to Figma. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma Figma is the best for collaboration, most intuitive interface and compatible with the most outside softwares. Plugin library is also expansive Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma Figma is by far the best prototyping tool out there. I am such a fan of this tool. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma I prefer using Figma the most so far during the past several years over tools like JustInMind and/or UX Pin. Incentivized Helpful? Raymond Weilacher Principal UX Designer at Fidelity Investments (Investment Management, 10,001+ employees) Chose Figma Figma is the only tool that was build from the ground up for enterprise level distributed teams. If I were a one man shop or even a small team, I would consider Sketch or other cheaper alternatives. For a large enterprise team, the only winner is Figma. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma Figma is the best for collaborative work. Very easy to learn, so easy that most people dont use it properly (which is good and bad at the same time). Prototyping is where I'd wish it will improve. Axure was awesome. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma Figma covers all our use cases. It helps with our design systems, pattern libraries, and prototyping; it's helpful to be cloud-based and sharable. Its plugins and usability for all team members make it very useful. Autolayout functionality is head and shoulders above the rest … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma I believe when it comes to prototyping and visualisation I would say Figma is way better than above mentioned tools. However, when it comes to workshops, brainstroming exercises and running sessions, I feel Miro might be better as compared to figjam and Mural. Figma is quite … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma We migrated from Sketch to Figma and appreciated the design system when selecting Figma. We also liked the increased collaboration it would enable. We've found both to be incredibly helpful in practice and are very happy with our decision. Figma is intuitive and committed to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma Previously, we were using more than 1 tool for a specific use case related to design needs, but learned that Figma was more comprehensive, thus we were able to reduce usage of 2+ tools into one saving our overall budget on UX tools. Figma also seems to be an industry-wide … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma Figma is truly a Swiss army knife in the retrospect that it does everything...but better that you'd expect it to be where you think...hmmm maybe I don't need this prototyping tool, or this design library framework app, or this simpler solution, because I can just use Figma for … Incentivized Helpful? Karol Stępień Software Development Manager in Engineering at Tesco Technology (Computer Software, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Figma Better performance or Multiplatform availability when compared to competition. Also easiness of use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma In theory it can do the all the things these other apps offer. And it does to a certain extend. if your prototypes are not too complex it can completely remove the need for other prototyping software. Through Figjam presentation and collaboration, alternatives provide no extra … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma What Figma does best above its competitors is allow collaboration without compromising design capabilities. The interface is incredibly intuitive and user-friendly, which made a big difference to us as not everyone on our team has the same skillset and design familiarity. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma Figma ruled them all out by having regular updates and becoming the leader in collaborative design app. Personally I liked Adobe XD better, it had a better feeling when working on a project, it was also faster but Figma won because of the “collaborative” part that it offered. … Incentivized Helpful? Molly Whelan Producer in Marketing at RocketBike (Marketing & Advertising, 11-50 employees) Chose Figma Figma can do it all and can do it all much better than the others. It covers all of our client and internal needs within a single platform that is highly collaborative and live, unlike these others. The robust nature of capabilities is also superior. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma I selected Figma because there is many good features like It is based on web so we can easily work wherever and any system only we need login our account. In Figma we can easily work together in single file as well. Prototyping is very easy in Figma, we can make any (Web/App) … Incentivized Helpful? Ankit Bhangar Product Consultant in Product Management at Petro IT (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Figma Yes definitely, it is way easier to use and has way better collaboration compared to Adobe Illustration and Sketch. Figma has better integration with the development team as it can export code and maintain assets as well. Another big upside of Figma is prototyping, since the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma Figma is a one stop tool which has all the functionality over using multiple tools Incentivized Helpful? Shawn Hoekstra Group Director, Experience Design in Professional Services at VMLY&R (Design, 10,001+ employees) Chose Figma Figma is superior to all of these products, from design, to prototyping, to documenting feedback Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Figma Figma offers more sophisticated features compared to other design tools. The collaboration aspect, motion design features, file organization, plug-ins give Figma a competitive advantage. Figma, additionally, now has a dev mode that converts screen designs into code for … Incentivized Helpful?	InVisionApp Inc. mICHAL Hipner DESIGNER in Quality Assurance at RPA (Civic & Social Organization, 11-50 employees) Chose InVision Figma is better for creating designs, invision is easier to use and more light weight when it comes to sharing designs Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose InVision We went with InVision because we were already bought into that ecosystem. We have since decided to move to Figma, as we were not receiving the features we needed from InVision and the associated tools (Whimsical, Sketch, Abstract, and Zeplin). The ROI of Figma allows us to free … Incentivized Helpful? Andrea Hester Director Of Operations at Clearfire, Inc. (Internet, 1-10 employees) Chose InVision InVision can be a powerful tool when paired with Sketch and other platforms like Freehand. However, Figma is currently the industry leader in terms of functionality and usability for collaborative UI design and prototyping. Invision's sharing and prototyping features are its … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose InVision Main difference is InVision's easy to use prototyping capability. When it is compared to Marvel and Axure RP, while it has less capabilities on tools it is more robust than both. I believe Figma is just a new and upgraded version of InVision where you could do everything online … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose InVision InVision is a bit limited overall compared to other programs like Figma, Photoshop, Illustrator and XD. At the time we selected InVision they were one of the leaders and introduced a lot of new features that were beneficial. However now we've moved back to many of the Adobe … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose InVision I choose InVision over Sketch, however Figma is leading because of the cloud feature collaboration and open source plugins Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose InVision InVision is a great tool to use and well worth the price. However, if you're looking for some variety, UXPin and Figma are worth looking into too. While UXPin may be a tad simplistic in the design ability, Figma is a great competitor to InVision. Both tools are worth looking … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose InVision we use different 'similar' applications for different usecases. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose InVision InVision's design is much more polished and seamless due to its apps on mobile and web. They are very easy to learn and gather feedback compared to Sketch or Principle. Although these features are quickly coming to the other apps, InVision has an upper hand at the moment with … Incentivized Helpful? Mitchell Clements UX Designer in Product Management at SimpleNexus (Financial Services, 51-200 employees) Chose InVision Other design tools have been creating their own prototyping functionality, which has made InVision less valuable over time. It is much more convenient to use the same tool for both design and prototyping, because it removes the unnecessary steps of exporting, importing, and … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Figma	InVision
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (201 ratings)	8.0 (48 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (7 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	8.6 (33 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)
Availability	5.5 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	8.2 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	5.1 (17 ratings)	8.8 (4 ratings)
In-Person Training	9.1 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Online Training	6.4 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Configurability	6.4 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model	7.3 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	6.4 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	7.3 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Professional Services	8.2 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	7.3 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	7.3 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)