Filebase vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage
Filebase vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Filebase | N/A | Filebase is an object storage platform powered by decentralized networks, from the company of the same name in Boston. It unifies multiple networks under a single S3-compatible API to make decentralized storage accessible, and with edge caching technology achieves performance when writing and fetching data to and from decentralized networks, making them a secure, geo-redundant alternative to traditional cloud storage. | $0 | |
IBM Cloud Object Storage | N/A | IBM Cloud Object Storage is an IBM Cloud product in the endpoint backup and IaaS categories. It is commonly used for data archiving and backup, for web and mobile applications, and as scalable, persistent storage for analytics. | $0 per month |
| Filebase | IBM Cloud Object Storage | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | The One-Rate and Standard service plans for Cloud Object Storage include resiliency options, flexible data classes and built-in security. Pricing is based on the choice of location, storage class and resiliency choice. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Filebase | IBM Cloud Object Storage |
|---|
| Filebase | IBM Cloud Object Storage | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
|
| Filebase | IBM Cloud Object Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage Score 9.6 out of 10 | DigitalOcean Droplets Score 8.7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() Azure Blob Storage Score 9.6 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() Azure Blob Storage Score 9.6 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Filebase | IBM Cloud Object Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.3 (149 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (5 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (8 ratings) |
| Online Training | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (1 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 5.8 (4 ratings) |
| Filebase | IBM Cloud Object Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Pros | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Cons | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Usability | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Performance | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Support Rating | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Online Training | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Scalability | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Cloud Object Storage Screenshots |














