Filebase vs. IBM Storage Protect
Filebase vs. IBM Storage Protect
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Filebase | N/A | Filebase is an object storage platform powered by decentralized networks, from the company of the same name in Boston. It unifies multiple networks under a single S3-compatible API to make decentralized storage accessible, and with edge caching technology achieves performance when writing and fetching data to and from decentralized networks, making them a secure, geo-redundant alternative to traditional cloud storage. | $0 | |
![]() IBM Storage Protect | N/A | IBM Storage Protect (formerly IBM Spectrum Protect, or Tivoli Storage Manager) provides data resilience for physical file servers, virtual environments, and applications. Organizations can scale up to manage billions of objects per backup server. | N/A |
| Filebase | IBM Storage Protect | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Filebase | IBM Storage Protect |
|---|
| Filebase | IBM Storage Protect | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Center Backup |
|
| Filebase | IBM Storage Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon S3 Glacier Score 9.1 out of 10 | Cove Data Protection Score 9.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() Azure Blob Storage Score 9.6 out of 10 | Bacula Enterprise Score 9.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() Azure Blob Storage Score 9.6 out of 10 | Bacula Enterprise Score 9.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Filebase | IBM Storage Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (10 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 7.0 (4 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 7.2 (5 ratings) |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Professional Services | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (1 ratings) |
| Filebase | IBM Storage Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Pros | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Cons | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Usability | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Support Rating | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Filebase No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| ScreenShots |




