FileBound vs. OpenText Content Suite Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FileBound
Score 2.0 out of 10
N/A
Upland FileBound is a document management system that enables reliable, user-friendly content workflow.N/A
OpenText Content Suite Platform
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
The OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
Pricing
FileBoundOpenText Content Suite Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FileBoundOpenText Content Suite Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FileBoundOpenText Content Suite Platform
Considered Both Products
FileBound

No answer on this topic

OpenText Content Suite Platform
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText comes in different versions and you are able to choose depending on your departmental or organizational needs. In terms of functionality and capabilities, it was able to offer more value as it checked all the boxes in terms of long-time retentions, reporting …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText Content Suite Platform replaced an existing Records Management solution and checked all of the boxes in regards to capabilities surrounding search, physical objects, long-term retention, and reporting capabilities.
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
Having used OpenText Content Suite for a long time, I can say it stands the competition. It offers many versions which is unlike many products in its category. Also, while it is not affordable, I believe the cost is justified considering what a business can achieve with this …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText Content Suite has been an amazing addition to our business thanks to its many features and capabilities. The fact that OpenText offers many versions makes its products competitive because there is so much we can accomplish with these products. Price wise, OpenText …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText is stronger in the management of high volume and secure information. However, SharePoint, while less functional from a document management perspective, provides a much stronger user interface which eases user adoption and the presentation of content. SharePoint also …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
SharePoint is not very strong on records management as part of the base system. So after evaluation, it was found to not comply to all needs and therefore discarded. We also evaluated Afresco which is an opensource offering. The problem was that we could not find enough people …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
I also used Tridion while at AP. It's tougher to learn (HTML knowledge is very helpful), but it is a much more powerful CMS. Tridion allows for language variation, more customization and the embedding of HD video. OpenText was a legacy system of our internal site. Tridion was …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
In my opinion, OpenText Content Suite Platform provides more powerful product and highly integrated solutions more than OCR solution that Abbyy provides.
I think OpenText Content Suite Platform obviously provides stronger support and services that Abbyy support and services …
Features
FileBoundOpenText Content Suite Platform
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
FileBound
8.7
Ratings
9% above category average
OpenText Content Suite Platform
7.6
Ratings
5% below category average
Content capture & imaging10.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Document management10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Records management8.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Content search & retrieval5.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance10.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings4.20 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Automated workflows00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Artificial intelligence00 Ratings4.20 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings4.90 Ratings
Integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FileBoundOpenText Content Suite Platform
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FileBoundOpenText Content Suite Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FileBoundOpenText Content Suite Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Filebound is great for documents that have been archived or not needed on a day to day basis. It serves it purpose as a storage/filing system to digitize any previous "hard copy" filing system. But for the day to day accessibility, I find other programs to be more responsive and quicker to use. Also, In order to use or edit any document uploaded to Filebound, you currently have to re-download the document onto your computer to edit. If the editing capabilities were streamlined for quicker response that would also be a plus.
Read full review
Your organisation has to support the type of document and records management needed for this to work. In an organisation that only needs to store documents and maybe share with many different parties, this might not be the best-suited software. In a large organisation with stringent document and records management policies, this suite is well suited. It makes management of documents across business units easy to manage and control.
Read full review
Pros
  • Filebound is easily to upload documents onto and file into the proper location. You can easily find a file on your computer and have it uploaded within seconds
  • Filebound gives you customization so you can create your own folders, criteria needed to file and search for uploaded documents. You have options of file types, names, certain fields of information to display when searching for files.
  • Filebound allows you to download and print your saved documents quickly for future access. There is no limit to how you can use your scanned documents
Read full review
  • ECM OpenText version is secure and easy to use
  • The different versions makes it easy to accomplish different tasks . We have more than three versions deployed in our company
  • The software is highly scalable
  • There are many customization options
  • The software is relatively affordable
Read full review
Cons
  • Searching for Documents. Filebound does not allow you to look in differing file types for a specific document. You have to search each file type individually. And we have found that spaces or symbols are needed in front of the entered search information in order for Filebound to do a more broad search.
  • You cannot move uploaded around, if you have more than one scan in a file. Once they are uploaded into a location, you cannot move it, you can only delete it and re-scan it into the proper file.
  • If it was possible to simply drag and drop a file into Filebound to start the upload process, that would save time.
Read full review
  • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
  • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
  • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Strong for Core Content and Records Management
Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
  • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
OpenText comes in different versions and you are able to choose depending on your departmental or organizational needs. In terms of functionality and capabilities, it was able to offer more value as it checked all the boxes in terms of long-time retentions, reporting capabilities, physical objects, and searches are great.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I don't have numbers, but our organization was able to go from having three large off-site and one on-site storage units to having none. This saved money on a monthly and yearly basis.
Read full review
  • With OpenText Content Suite, we save time thanks to its features such as imaging
  • Mobile support is amazing and this makes working anywhere easy
  • Since it is very secure, we do not have to worry about content
  • The collaboration features make it even better by improving the user experience.
Read full review
ScreenShots