| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Firebase | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Google offers the Firebase suite of application development tools, available free or at cost for higher degree of usages, priced flexibly accorded to features needed. The suite includes A/B testing and Crashlytics, Cloud Messaging (FCM) and in-app messaging, cloud storage and NoSQL storage (Cloud Firestore and Firestore Realtime Database), and other features supporting developers with flexible mobile application development. | $0.01 Per Verification |
 Microsoft Azure | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. | $29 per month |
| Firebase | Microsoft Azure | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | The free tier lets users have access to a variety of services free for 12 months with limited usage after making an Azure account. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Firebase | Microsoft Azure | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Firebase Firebase came to a multiuse case for our product for authenticating backend services, users on the app & get data on the user base using the dashboard. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Firebase We chose Firebase for the following reasons.
Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Firebase | Microsoft Azure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Firebase | Microsoft Azure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 8.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | 7.0 | 9.4 |
| Availability | - | 6.8 |
| Support Rating | 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
