FirebirdSQL vs. Neo4j

When looking for low maintenance and a solution suited for all kinds of pc applications. It is great when you are looking to store physical files in folder locations and you can then reference the document in the database. It has an open-source community around it along with documentation for third-party drivers of the development environment.

Incentivized

Its very well suited for storing graph types relationship information, such as a group of people and their relationships. Data modeling this sort of information in a traditional SQL database is a pain and inefficient. Using Neo4J allows for efficient modeling of data while providing rich querying capabilities using Cypher. Its also a great fit for any programming language because of its support for REST API. It's less appropriate for any other data structure other than Graph data. So as with any DB, evaluate the data structure and query and if the querying revolves around relationships, then Neo4J is a fit. If there is more need for looking up individual nodes and their associated information, Neo4J might not be the most efficient solution in the market.

Incentivized

• Reliable RDMS for the SMB's and we found its performance is really fast.
• It allows us to store the physical files into the folder location and reference of the document in the database.
• Easy to take back-ups, and portable.

Incentivized

• When joins are a common in a relational store, switching to Neo4j is better
• When pattern matching and surfacing interesting insights is the goal, neo4j's cypher is pretty powerful
• When schema is not completely known beforehand and needs to be evolved with time

Incentivized

• Clustering features require alot of attention.
• Remote access can be quite slow.

Incentivized

• It would be nice to have some concept of namespaces, or some way of roughly making a single instance multi-tenant. It'd be nice to make sandboxing easier.
• Automatic backups could be improved.

Incentivized

Because it is free and usually zero maintenance. Just the issue of more difficult format updates in the future lower the rating a bit.

Incentivized

Usability has improved by unifying the architecture. The only thing's missing out of the box is a simple GUI DB tool for viewing DB contents and maybe running some SQL queries.

Incentivized

[Based on] Query Language, Performance on small and large data sets, integration and deployment, analysis, API support, Interactive UI.

Incentivized

This is an open source project. It provides a fair amount of free documentation and I think forums somewhere...

Incentivized

Even somebody just starting to use RDBMS himself should get it working quickly, at least if he's got a GUI tool and some SQL knowledge.

Incentivized

It is cost-effective, maintenance-free, easy to deploy and use on Linux and Windows environments and it works steadily. It has an open-source license. Installing Oracle was quite difficult in comparison to Firebird.

Incentivized

I have not used anything like Neo4J because of how unique it is in the work that it allows me to do. I am not aware of any other graph database platforms and it might be because it is a growing area (especially in the world of pharmaceuticals). I would be open to trying other softwares though.

Incentivized

• The return on investment was of course because it freed us from paid relational databases.
• We have never experienced a negative situation.

Incentivized

• For experimentation purposes, it had a positive impact on my company. It was very natural to work with Neo4j and so intuitive to visualize the data.
• Neo4j community edition is free, which is what we experimented on. So there was no investment up front apart from employee's time. But this quickly gave results and it was time well spent.
• Neo4j is a cool but very new technology. It was hard to have people onboard, especially some of the leadership and relational folks.

Incentivized