FirebirdSQL vs. RaimaDB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Firebird
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
FirebirdSQL is an open-source database which can be embedded.N/A
RaimaDB
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The Raima Database Manager (RDM) from Raima Inc in Seattle, Washington is a relational database management system.N/A
Pricing
FirebirdSQLRaimaDB
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FirebirdRaimaDB
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FirebirdSQLRaimaDB
Considered Both Products
Firebird
Chose Firebird
It is cost-effective, maintenance-free, easy to deploy and use on Linux and Windows environments and it works steadily. It has an open-source license. Installing Oracle was quite difficult in comparison to Firebird.
Chose Firebird
It came a time when the practice of SQLite was lagging behind and of course, we were looking at the cost that was being involved and so Firebird made the breakthrough for us from both. It has an open-source license and it is easy to deploy on Windows and Linux environments.
Chose Firebird
As you know, the version of an application is very good for a period in the world of information technologies, it is the first in the performance / cost table. But some periods come and that practice lags behind. When Firebird made such a breakthrough, we preferred this …
Chose Firebird
Back then I evaluated Oracle 8, IBM DB2, Mimer, SAP DB, MySQL, Borland Interbase (not Embarcadero Interbase and that one has the same roots as Firebird) and most likely other RDBMS. Firebird was free, usage was ok, it was (for my application) maintenance free and speed was ok …
RaimaDB
Chose RaimaDB
RDM performs way better than SQLite when the database is larger and has multiple users.
Best Alternatives
FirebirdSQLRaimaDB
Small Businesses
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.8 out of 10
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.6 out of 10
SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.6 out of 10
SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FirebirdSQLRaimaDB
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FirebirdSQLRaimaDB
Likelihood to Recommend
When looking for low maintenance and a solution suited for all kinds of pc applications. It is great when you are looking to store physical files in folder locations and you can then reference the document in the database. It has an open-source community around it along with documentation for third-party drivers of the development environment.
Read full review
Works very well in applications designed for IoT devices where performance and footprint are of great importance.
Read full review
Pros
  • Reliable RDMS for the SMB's and we found its performance is really fast.
  • It allows us to store the physical files into the folder location and reference of the document in the database.
  • Easy to take back-ups, and portable.
Read full review
  • First of all the performance of RDM was superior compared to SQLite in my multi-user environment (about 200 users). The pricing was surprisingly good compared to other high-performance databases.
  • Decreased time to market, a faster and more performant application overall and lower maintenance costs.
  • They run on most RTOS and can be used in a cross-platform environment.
Read full review
Cons
  • Clustering features require alot of attention.
  • Remote access can be quite slow.
Read full review
  • I would like to see REST API with a GUI for administration
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Because it is free and usually zero maintenance. Just the issue of more difficult format updates in the future lower the rating a bit.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Usability has improved by unifying the architecture. The only thing's missing out of the box is a simple GUI DB tool for viewing DB contents and maybe running some SQL queries.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
This is an open source project. It provides a fair amount of free documentation and I think forums somewhere...
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Even somebody just starting to use RDBMS himself should get it working quickly, at least if he's got a GUI tool and some SQL knowledge.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It is cost-effective, maintenance-free, easy to deploy and use on Linux and Windows environments and it works steadily. It has an open-source license. Installing Oracle was quite difficult in comparison to Firebird.
Read full review
RDM performs way better than SQLite when the database is larger and has multiple users.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The return on investment was of course because it freed us from paid relational databases.
  • We have never experienced a negative situation.
Read full review
  • Decreased time to market
  • Decreased maintenance and service costs on hardware.
Read full review
ScreenShots