TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FireMon

    Score7.9 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    FireMon is a real-time security policy management solution built for today’s complex multi-vendor, enterprise environments. Supporting the latest firewall and policy enforcement technologies spanning on-premises networks to the cloud, FireMon delivers visibility and control across the entire IT landscape to automate policy changes, meet compliance standards, to minimize policy-related risk. Since creating their policy management solution in 2004, FireMon states they've helped…N/A
    Pricing
    FireMon
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FireMon
    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Yes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptional
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FireMon
    Considered Both Products
    FireMon
    Chose FireMon
    FireMon gives us more flexibility when deploying the solution. Integrates with cutting-edge security solutions
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    We have only used firemon and there hasn't been a need to consider other products as we are satisfied with what Firemon can do.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    Firewall Rule analyzer was used before I joined the company, but I have no experience with it.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    OSSEC is open source and FM is much better from GUI and supportability stand points. Tufin and FireMon are very comparable
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    Best Compliance and Auditing tool to to identify the traffic that is hitting this rule.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    I was not involved on the decision but having multiple brands in the company make sense to use a tool such as Firemon because it integrates easily with multiple vendors.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    AlgoSec and Tufin both are good tools but the cost involved for what they offer as services led us to go with Firemon.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    i was not involved in the selection however i am quite happy with FireMon as the replacement of our aging product.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    We have stuck with FireMon, and there is no reason to leave.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    The Dell product ran on its own hardware, which failed often. The reports were not available to us in real-time, we had to request them. Many false detections of issues.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    None
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    Both perform admirably with regards to providing that single pane of glass and visibility in a normalized view. They both provide great insight into where your organization stands in terms of compliance controls. In terms of upgrading and scalability, I would have to give the …
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    NA
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    I has worked with AlgoSec and while they are very similar product, I find the FireMon is easier to understand and get rolling with. While both require some learning, FireMon is by far the easier one. Once you have an understanding of how things are arranged and labeled you can …
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    FireMon has the most supported devices.
    The UI is easy to use and intuitive.
    There is a comprehensive list of built in compliance controls that are missing in the competition.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    To be blunt, at the time of purchase most of these products appeared to do the same things in the same ways. What really brought us to the table with FireMon six years ago was their willingness to earn our business, and to this day they remain just as committed to keeping our …
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    FireMon is way more flexible and the interface is tremendously better than any existing ones.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    AlgoSec is a great tool, lower in cost as well.

    FireMon has alot of capabilites, but our organization is not ready or have a use case yet for those features.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    Tufin works much better with CheckPoint.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    They are two very well done tools, FireMon is better suited for firewall rules evaluation, configuration and review, Tenable.io is better suited for CIS benchmarking. We ended up using both of them in the end, it really depends of your needs and what you are looking for, the …
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    Nothing like FireMon. We have other tools but 99% of them are looking at specific areas and not the enterprise security on a dashboard.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    We performed a head-to-head PoC between FireMon and AlgoSec several years ago. Both platforms were well developed, but FireMon had the upper hand in three areas:
    1. Its UI was more unified and intuitive across the different components and products
    2. The reporting was better suited …
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    Tufin and Skybox are products that I've analyzed over the past few years, but never purchased.
    Incentivized
    Chose FireMon
    AlgoSec and Tufin both have initial issues during the POC stage, and FireMon even though with the changes they have made still works better and is more user friendly.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    FireMon
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.9
    (69 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.8
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.7
    (17 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.9
    (48 ratings)