Worldpay, now from FIS (acquired July, 2019) is a solution designed to simplify payment acceptance and improve the user's bottom line by accepting traditional and alternative payment types anywhere, any time, on any device and across channels. Worldpay from FIS also guides crypto exchanges through the complexities of global payment processing. Their card-to-crypto services enable crypto exchanges to leverage global card networks like Visa and Mastercard to accept credit and…
N/A
Kyriba
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Kyriba empowers CFOs, Treasurers and their IT counterparts to transform liquidity as a dynamic, real-time vehicle for growth and value creation. Kyriba is a secure, scalable SaaS platform that leverages artificial intelligence, automates payments workflows, and enables thousands of multinational corporations and banks to maximize growth, protect against loss from fraud and financial risk and reduce operational costs. Kyriba states that for…
N/A
Pricing
Worldpay from FIS
Kyriba
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Worldpay from FIS
Kyriba
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Worldpay from FIS
Kyriba
Considered Both Products
Worldpay from FIS
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Worldpay from FIS
We looked at using Authorize.net and we went with Worldpay because it was most similar to our US backend. If we started from scratch, we would have harmonized and done both US and international on the same gateway as it would have simplified our overall landscape from …
As our payment gateway, Authorize.net allowed us to adjust the settings for which customer information we want to verify before the transaction is approved. None of those options are available on WorldPay and they act like we're idiots for even asking. As a result, we've seen a …
Vantiv provides many more options in the way of reporting than authorize.net and Paypal. Vantiv also lets you link multiple accounts to one login, which saves a lot of time. I would say that Vantiv's website is less reliable than that of authorize.net or Paypal, which can be …
We have been using Vantiv for years, and have added other online payment options for other applications as needed. Some payment options are geared more toward donations, others are for mobile payments, others can do a little of both. Vantiv is what we use strictly for our …
Treasura has not been invested in for product development for over a decade. It was ahead of its time back in 2010 but now it falls short of the user experience and sophistication / logic rules that Kyriba provides. Kyriba continues to invest in and develop its product to …
Before going with Kyriba, we considered a number of products. However, the main reason we went with it was how easy it was to integrate it with bank statements. With other software, it isn't easy to implement. Kyriba is very easy to use and the system performance while using it …
Cenveo evaluated multiple Treasury Management Systems; however, Kryiba was the only one that could provide us with the solution for our AP payments. Cenveo required the TMS to allow at least 2 levels of approval in selecting and paying vendors at the invoices level & clearing …
The above are all examples of bank rec software, Kyriba was selected over its competitors after a comprehensive vetting process. Kyriba has served us well, covering the bank rec process efficiently as well as being a one-stop-shop for treasury and banking-related functions for …
It is one of the amazing tools which gives a superb performance. the cash and liquidity management of this tool is very strong because all the modules of this product work super well in any company with all the banks all across the globe. Also, the function of reporting is very …
C2treasury is a good product but with limited functionality, particularly in the connectivity space. They don't offer a concentrator solution that is cheap for fewer accounts. Reporting is also limited. Blackline is a different product but its Bank reconciliation is a little …
Elire had a lot of options that we deemed unnecessary, and the cost was much more than that of Kyriba. Elire did have some options that were very intriguing to us that Kyriba cannot do, but the price differential combined with the complexity of Elire made us decide that Kyriba …
In previous companies, the payments were processed from an AS400 based module, which required a deep technical knowledge for every action required, turning simple things like adding a bank account into a nightmare
With Kyriba, most of the processes and updates just requires a …
As I stated, I was not a part of the process to select a TMS, but I do know that several were evaluated back in 2014 I believe. The final candidates were GTreasury and Kyriba. Kyriba was selected in large part to having the more dynamic capabilities for a global organization …
Kyriba offers a more comprehensive and end to end workflow for a SaaS offering. It is structured around Cash management/visibility but has sufficient functionality for complementary functions to serve as a stand-alone system at a better cost than its competitors. It is more …
Kyriba is just a good as the other products available. It is easy to use and understand. However, they need to enhance their offering to show value above and beyond the other workstations. Since, we are a domestic company, Kyriba works well. If we had more advanced …
I've outlined all the reasons previously. Cost, Experts in TMS with one line of business, large enough to have the resources to improve, but small enough to be nimble and quick with upgrades and changes after listening to the clients.
One of the more attractive features of Kyriba as compared to Quantum was the knowledge that we would not need to test and install upgrades. We had a custom module in Quantum that eventually became incompatible with newer versions of the core product, so we were stuck on an …
World pay from FIS is well suited to help our clients with storing credit cards on file in the software, memberships, offers a variety of payment options, etc. Typically it can be less suited for smaller businesses who are getting better rates from their local banks in town, compared to what World Pay can offer them.
This tool is a great solution and in spite of all the flaws, it has been rendering its services for the longest time. The platform is user-friendly and it just completely empowers your organization with a whole view over all types of cash positions that automatically provides an organization with the liberty to make a correct decision at any point in time. From my experience, I must say that this product has been delivering a highly secure enterprise platform.
Vantiv's credit card processing terminal is very straightforward, easy to use, and fast.
Vantiv's credit card dispute portal provides beneficial information regarding disputes and chargebacks. Even the customer number associated with the charge is provided, which cuts down on time needed to research conflicts.
The Vantiv homepage/dashboard is structured in a very easy to navigate fashion.
Keeps our very large multi-bank account structure in balance daily, and gives daily visibility to all bank account balances for Treasury and the rest of Mercy
GL Mapping, creation and export of GL entries, and reconciliation of ALL GL entries back to the bank accounts.
Listens to client's suggestions and ideas, responds quickly with answers, regularly updates software based on our input. Also, they have a great Kyriba Social website where we can put in tickets for help and send in our ideas, but more importantly, share questions and ideas with the whole Kyriba client community, and provides FAQ from that dialogue for just about any question that we can think of. Great customer support and communication works well both directions.
Implementation process is well mapped out, but flexible to the client's needs. If I'm experienced and comfortable with TMS systems, I can do a lot more of the setup work instead of paying Kyriba to do it all, but if I need Kyriba to do it all, they will. Love the training process, which works a lot like college, where they teach you a section, give you homework to do before the next training session, check your accuracy and understanding, and move on to the next section. Almost all the Kyriba implementation folks I've worked with and met with were former Treasury practitioners, so they know what we know and they how to talk to us and with their developers to give us what we need.
Very high value for the low cost and scale-able depending on how many modules you need. Monthly fees are very reasonable, implementation fees are known up front, and you only pay for what you use, and annual volume based fees are reasonable as well. Much, much cheaper than bank fees for Information reporting, didn't require any MIS approval or assistance, and very easy to justify to upper management based on the massive labor savings.
One of the big reasons I love Kyriba so much is TMS is all they do and they have grown consistently in the 4 years we've been with them, and are very stable. I like that their whole focus is on providing the best TMS platform on the market, and not getting off track working on other non-TMS priorities and products. In the past, many TMS systems were owned by larger conglomerates, were bought and sold multiple times, and often times support and customer service was non-existent, and coworkers were leaving the firm left and right. Many went to Kyriba. That's the main reason I started looking and found Kyriba in the first place.
As long as Vantiv continues to improve and we can get better responses from customer service, we will likely continue to use Vantiv. However, if customer service declines, we will likely look for something else
Very powerful treasury management tool, the reason it's not a 10 is implementation and support lags behind competitors. It can take a long time for issues to get resolved. But once it's set up properly, everything works well most of the time. Few if any other providers will have the same range of features.
It can always be better. There needs to be more instances wherein the user can make changes that work for them and those changes would be saved for future use, not having to make the same changes over and over again.
Many customer support employees of Vantiv do not seem to know much about the Vantiv website. I have been transferred around to as many as four different people to get an answer to what I thought was a simple question. I am not sure if it would be possible to receive adequate support for a more complex issue.
We have weekly calls with our support team to discuss ongoing implementation projects and other issues we find from time to time. They are very responsive to any questions we have and can escalate issues to a higher level of support if they do not have the expertise necessary to fix the problem. They are helpful in coordinating testing with banks if necessary, and provide regular statistics regarding support calls, causes of problems, and resolution.
We had some issues with one of the implementation people provided by Kyriba. The communication skills were lacking, with assumptions being made as to what we knew already. It was very frustrating. Once that was resolved, further module implementations have been smoother.
We looked at using Authorize.Net and we went with Worldpay because it was most similar to our US backend. If we started from scratch, we would have harmonized and done both US and international on the same gateway as it would have simplified our overall landscape from implementation.
The above are all examples of bank rec software, Kyriba was selected over its competitors after a comprehensive vetting process. Kyriba has served us well, covering the bank rec process efficiently as well as being a one-stop-shop for treasury and banking-related functions for our group of companies.
Kyriba saves our department time, which is the most valuable thing we have. Before Kyriba we had to log into each bank to pull data for the prior day before we could enter our current day activity. Now the banks send the data right to Kyriba! It saves us about 3 hours of work each day from our old process.
Kyriba has given us visibility into all of our bank accounts in a centralized platform. We can better monitor activity and use that information to make better business decisions.
Kyriba has given us better transparency because of dual approval. One person has to enter information and another person has to approve information, so we have tighter controls.
