FloQast vs. OneStream

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FloQast
Score 9.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail.N/A
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
OneStream is an enterprise finance platform that unifies financial and operational data, embeds AI for better decisions and productivity, and can extend to meet the evolving needs of businesses without adding technical debt. Presented as an operating system for modern Finance, it unifies core financial functions and empowering the CFO to become a critical driver of business strategy, innovation, and growth. It is a cloud-based platform that modernizes the Office of the CFO. The…
$0
Pricing
FloQastOneStream
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
Basic
$12
per month billed annually
Basic
$15
per month
Standard
$32
per month billed annually
Professional
$39
per month billed annually
Standard
$39
per month
Professional
$49
per month
Enterprise
$83
per month billed annually
Enterprise
$99
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FloQastOneStream
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredRequired
Additional DetailsThe solution is only for Enterprises. Pricing for software is based on number of total users and one user gets all software functionality. Implementation would be based on what business problem or problems the solution will be used to solve, such as financial consolidation and reporting or planning or account reconciliations, etc.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FloQastOneStream
Considered Both Products
FloQast
Chose FloQast
that was all manual, this keeps things in one central place and automatically syncs with our ERP
Chose FloQast
We started with BlackLine and after a year and limited adoption across the accounting team, changed to FloQast. We had numerous reasons, including difficulty in working with the BlackLine standard reconciliation, time needed to complete the set up for automatic reconciliation …
Chose FloQast
We use Netsuite for our main GL and reporting ERP. Blackline was much more expensive and we went with FloQast.
Chose FloQast
Having FloQast automatically pulls updates from excel files saved in our shared folders is key instead of having to upload new files as we've done in the past with other comparable products
Chose FloQast
At the time we picked FloQast, they were the most cost effective and easiest tool to use. Fast forward a little bit, and Numeric has come to market. I really lie Numeric to be honest and feel that their pricing is better and for that lower pricing, they include more …
Chose FloQast
The User Interface and implementation were the key drivers for choosing FloQast compared to BlackLine.
Chose FloQast
Since it connects to our accounting software it has made the closing process much better than any other tools.
Chose FloQast
The User Interface and implementation were the key drivers for choosing FQ compared to BL. Our team was up in a matter of days or so it felt! Even if you didn't get properly trained in FQ, you could easily figure it out on your own, which was nice, especially for a large team.
Chose FloQast
We found that FloQast fit well into our existing close process and made it much more efficient. Other rooms, such as Blackline, required a longer and more costly implementation. It also required the use of their reconciliation formats. We did not see the value in that …
Chose FloQast
I used Blackline many years ago but found it to be a waste of time. I didn't like being required to use the Blackline format for reconciliations. The one size fits all mentality never quite works out when it comes to accounting - every business does things a little differently. …
Chose FloQast
Netgain has a product called NetClose which we've considered but ultimately went with FloQast because of simplicity and ease of use. The other product was more technical and hands on.
Chose FloQast
FloQast has a strong brand, offers excellent customer service, has a strong core product, and continues to improve and provide additional value to its customers.
Chose FloQast
More dynamic, linked with tools we already use including g drive and excel
Chose FloQast
We evaluated BlackLine along with FloQast and ultimately decided to sign up with FloQast. Our team really liked the ability to leverage their existing Excel reconciliation templates that could link to the FloQast user interface. Comparatively, the pre-made reconciliation …
Chose FloQast
We evaluated Blackline when we were considering Floqast. Although Blackline is very robust and feature rich it was not right for us at the time of our review. We chose Floqast because:
1. It was simple to set up. We were up in running in a few weeks as compared to the 6 month …
Chose FloQast
We primarily use FloQast for close and variance analysis whereas we use Monday for project tracking including Audit PBC
Chose FloQast
I have not used any other products
Chose FloQast
We selected FloQast because of how flexible it was and how easily it incorporated our existing excel workpapers into the system. It was also able to accommodate our ERP, despite not having a native integration for it.
Chose FloQast
FloQast is more user-friendly and flexible. The product is updated more frequently.
Chose FloQast
I have experience using Asana and Jira in previous jobs and while they are both useful, neither are tailored to accounting. That is where I feel that FloQast truly shines - there are so many features that other project management softwares are lacking, and after using FloQast …
Chose FloQast
NetClose (from NetGain) is pretty similar and is also a great tool. For a single company that uses NetSuite, NetClose can be a great option, however FloQast has more features like ReMind and aurorecs that NetClose does not have. For a CAS firm, it is a no brainer though, …
OneStream
Chose OneStream
Specifically talking with OneStream is very useful and considering easy to access more standardized and help to easy to navigate. Most common is user friendly and best financial planning tool which I ever seen! Compare with other tools OneStream provide best excel integration …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is a superior product compared to our previous legacy system. Would highly recommend for finance teams.
Chose OneStream
OneStream appears to be the best-in-class solution. Still, SAP Analytics Cloud integrates so seamlessly with SAP that it's tough to justify going "out of the family" when you're already deeply integrated with SAP.
Chose OneStream
For me, the choice for OneStream is due to the amount that can be configured and pre-configured which allows us to create standard and reusable content. This speeds up our service delivery.
Chose OneStream
OneStream is much more robust, has functionality around creating financial statements in Common Currency which other systems we used could not handle. OneStream has a really good structure around it. We believe it's a much better fit for a Global company of our size. We're just …
Chose OneStream
Compared to some of the options we researched, OneStream is a much more modern product in the way it combines the different capabilities of intense calculations, highly customizable dashboards, great narrative reporting as well as the much loved Excel plug-in capability. We …
Chose OneStream
The performance gains with OneStream alone are a reason to switch from Oracle, but the versatility of the application is the icing on the cake. Versatility is added by the additional dimensions, the customizable dashboards where you can plan for Revenue and Expenses, People …
Chose OneStream
OneStream gave me my life back. Working in outdated Essbase for closing the books & Forecasting it would take us 10-12 days working 12 - 16 hour days. 2020 we went to OneStream. I have not worked a weekend since, closing and forecasting went to 5-7 days working 8-9 hours a …
Chose OneStream
IBM Analytics seemed quite competitive. OneStream was selected because it has the consolidation and planning functionalities in the same cube. Overall cost for implementation and use were lower.
Lucanet and Anaplan seemed to have less flexibility to adapt the planning …
Chose OneStream
OneStream had a lot more capabilities as an all rounder tool that could leverage Actuals, forecast planning plus the other features like Tax and Transaction matching. OneStream also offer a Marketplace where a lot of bolt on modules are available for free with only some …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is the only one that seamlessly integrates close/consolidation with budget and planning in one tool. It integrates easily with ERPs and supports full financial statement AND management reporting
Chose OneStream
OneStream offers a comprehensive toolset to facilitate most modeling requirements. Our primary focus for selecting onestream was to facilitate a fast, robust and fully auditable consolidation tool that would meet our growing business requirements. OneStream has delivered on all …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is able to integrate faster and has a broader scope of newer technologies which makes it interact with other systems much more efficiently and seamlessly.
Chose OneStream
OneStream combines functionality that is normally spread over multiple solutions with other vendors, and provides an integration that previously could only be achieved via complicated technical structures to integrate and combine solutions for actual reporting and planning on …
Chose OneStream
OneStream single unified platform capabilities are outstanding. The flexibility around OneStream has allowed us to mold OneStream into our business model, whereas, I felt SAP forced us into their model. As an analyst, the reporting capabilities are my bread and butter and they …
Chose OneStream
Better GUI, faster, easier to maintain/administer.
Chose OneStream
I think HFM is very good at consolidation as well, but it is less flexible, not a platform, not as modern (look-and-feel), not as fast. In my opinion, OneStream stands out in the platform thinking. You have one licence which you can use for consolidation, tax, FP&A and even ESG …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is still being further developed and improved. Their marketplace provides some nice pre-built solutions. These are not as common with competitors. OneStream has a helpdesk that customers can reach out to instead of going through a middle man like consultants or …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is quite updated comparing with BPC. It has instant updates and it has more features like quick view, cubeview, dashboards, BI, Task scheduler. It's good for businesses to use it with a wide range of options to make their business decisions in short times. OneStream …
Chose OneStream
Achieve business expectations compared to other competitors
customized WFs based on requirements
BRs to meet end result
Chose OneStream
OneStream is the overall clear winner against HFM. There are a few things HFM does better (a couple things in Smart View), but it just doesn't have as much capability. The single, integrated platform that OneStream is provides a massive upgrade from HFM.
Chose OneStream
Hyperion HFM was a previous market leader in the EPM space but the OneStream FX platofrm far surpasses its offerings from Dashboarding, Workflow, Planning and forecasting all in one platform which under Hyperion was bundled in separate modules.
Chose OneStream
better system design and integration of tools
Chose OneStream
To sum it up, OneStream is like the Oracle Hyperion suite having a baby and feeding it steroids. It is leagues ahead.

OneStream is a one stop shop with one licence needed. There is no need to buy a licence for each product used like Hyperion.
Features
FloQastOneStream
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
8.5
Ratings
4% above category average
OneStream
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Financial data consolidation8.50 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Journal entries and reports7.80 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails9.20 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Customizable Workflows8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
OneStream
8.2
Ratings
7% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
OneStream
6.4
Ratings
24% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
OneStream
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
OneStream
6.9
Ratings
10% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
OneStream
8.6
Ratings
1% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
OneStream
6.1
Ratings
25% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
OneStream
7.7
Ratings
7% below category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
OneStream
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
OneStream
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
OneStream
8.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FloQastOneStream
Small Businesses
Tipalti
Tipalti
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cube
Cube
Score 8.9 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FloQastOneStream
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.8
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.4
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FloQastOneStream
Likelihood to Recommend
It's really good in ensuring all of our accounting/finance people are on the same page and knowing what work is outstanding, at what step in the process reconcs or checklists or at, if we're tracking on time, who may need some additional support, etc. It really does a great job of letting us know when accounts are out of balance and needs to be looked at again. Ensures we will be fully ready for audit and pass with flying colors.
Read full review
OneStream is best suited for medium to large companies that find themselves doing a wide variety of manual processes during their financial close cycle will get the most benefit. That does mean a lot of change so there has to be very intentional communication around change management in order to get the buy in that is necessary for success.
Read full review
Pros
  • Tracking of close tasks thanks to the monthly close calendar option
  • Review - tasks are stamped with the reviewer name & date reviewed
  • Ease of review - attachments are uploaded, account balances are populated via communication with the ERP, Note feature allows for review comments
Read full review
  • Consolidation engine is powerful, we have around 500 entities translating from multiple source currencies into a common currency at good speed.
  • We leverage the Flash and Quarterly forecast providing users with pre seeded data so they only need to make tweaks rather then filling in a lot of manual forms.
  • We use Transaction matching for processing a lot of intercompany matching invoices from the ERP systems which helps end users a lot. Data is fed in from source ERPS and TXM generates the auto matches based on criteria provided.
  • We have a custom Tax module which we use to pull in tax entries from the consolidation side and this gives the Tax teams starting position for their tax calculations and enables them to also do a quarterly forecast estimate.
  • OneStream has great dashboarding capabilities for a whole range of use cases from charts and graphs, to drill-back data to running even steps that users can execute without having access to the source code/rules in the background!
Read full review
Cons
  • It would be great to see drill down capabilities between account reconciliations/flux analyses that links to our transactional data in our ERP.
  • I would like to see a litte more customization available in the analytics tab to add custom filter drop downs.
  • I believe this is close to being released, but I'd like to see anticipated time commitments on the task level to be able to easily review capacity type reporting/analytics.
Read full review
  • Provide some more prebuilt dashboards that serve as reference examples for specific topics, to allow users to gain an idea of all that is possible
  • Provide some clear cut explanations to explain some of the standard concepts, to allow companies that start their implementation to gain a quick understanding of how things work
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It has proven to enhance our procedures with closing. It is an effective tool that I would recommend to create a more efficient closing procedure and get the team more aligned. It increases the accountability among the staff and helps to keep us on task and on time. It is easy to sign into and has reminder emails for tasks that are coming up or late.
Read full review
Currently we are using OneStream with people 80 - 100 to load the PL, BS , Forecast budget and People Planning. OneStream give us more visibility on trend and way forward thinking. Thanks to OneStream for the tool which helps the business in growing way. Thinking of innovation OneStream is right path.
Read full review
Usability
FloQast is incredibly intuitive and easy to use. The only reason I don't give it a 10 is that the Flux Analysis feature is not great in terms of getting the information into the system. Once it's in, fantastic! But some work is needed
Read full review
Overall usability as an end-user is very easy. There are more people in the system getting information now than the prior platform used. People are gathering their information quicker as well. From an administrator standpoint, there are fewer glitches and issues than the prior platform. This is very good.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We have only noticed a slight slow down in accessing FloQast on a couple of occasions (near the beginning of a month when many people were likely trying to get online to close their books). The issue has always resolved itself with three to five minutes, so it's never been a hinderance.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
FloQast's performance is great. The pages always load quickly, and reports are completed fast! I've never noticed any slowdown in our ERP from the interface with FloQast.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
They are rapid in their response. If they can't immediately offer a solution, they continue to keep in contact with you to let you know where they are in resolving your issues. The staff is friendly & speaks to you in layman's terms, not so high-tech that you can't understand
Read full review
OneStream support is focused on the infrastructure. Which means mainly when there issues with accessing to the system, they will be able to help. When the question is to much leaning towards functional it really becomes billable. The other issue is that the response time is not optimal. There is a lot of pingpong of messages and the time between the message can sometimes be long. Sometimes this result into a simple ticket to be taking days before it is closed.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The FloQast team members are just so personable. FloQast has clearly done a great job hiring people who are not just good at what they do, but are also fun to work with! They have placed people in the right roles and the customer benefits from this. I have enjoyed every opportunity I've had to work with a FloQast team member on training.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The online training is good. But like all online, pre-recorded training, it is never quite as good as in-person or live training where one can ask questions or get clarification. That said, FloQast has an extensive training library and most of the time, if one finds they need help on a topic, it can be answered by going to the online training and watching appropriate recording.
Read full review
onestream offers a range of training. I have attended a number of trainings. During the trainings a vast amount of information is discussed. The trainings also include exercises. The speed of the training is pretty high. When reviewing the training material afterwards, I found that the material is not complete as reference as it relies also very much on the verbal explanation and elaboration.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Implementation occured before I started with the company (but despite the instruction to skip the question if I did not participate, the site required I put in a rating in order to move on to the next page)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I used BlackLine at my previous job. Now I use FloQast at my current job. FloQast is, in my opinion, much easier to use than BlackLine and the looks and feels of the website are more user friendly and visually pleasing. BlackLine seemed like a separate system and was not really connected to Intacct (they used Intacct as well at my previous job). Everything just seemed clumsy with that system. FQ is smoother.
Read full review
OneStream is much more robust, has functionality around creating financial statements in Common Currency which other systems we used could not handle. OneStream has a really good structure around it. We believe it's a much better fit for a Global company of our size. We're just scratching a surface of what the system capabilities are.
Read full review
Scalability
We started using it with one client/customer and now use it with fourteen entities and plan to add two more in the next couple of months. It has made it possible to grow our business without hiring additional personnel. We can do more work with the same number of people
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Has helped to reduce time to close from 7-8 days to 5 days .
  • Allows all entities to follow the same process globally. This has reduced risk and allowed great oversight at the parent entity level.
  • This has allowed the accounting team to provide real-time updates to the CFO and FP&A on close status.
Read full review
  • Customers have moved from multiple EPM systems as well as multiple EPM applications to OneStream.
  • Their ROI has been quite high as lesser admins are required, no need to move data back & forth, no need for an additional dashboarding / BI tool, once a user is on OneStream can leverage it for more than 50+ use cases at no additional license cost.
  • Automation, direct integration, scheduling, complex calculation capabilities, all help to further improve ROI and free up the time for the team to do value-adding tasks.
  • Last but not the least is the confidence on the numbers is much higher.
Read full review
ScreenShots

FloQast Screenshots

Screenshot of the analytics that displays progress throughout the closeScreenshot of flux analysisScreenshot of reconciliations

OneStream Screenshots

Screenshot of OneStream DashboardScreenshot of Profitability AnalysisScreenshot of Product and Customer ProfitabilityScreenshot of Account ReconciliationsScreenshot of Cash PlanningScreenshot of Financial Signaling