Flowgear vs. IBM App Connect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Flowgear
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Flowgear’s platform enables organisations to build application, data and API integrations whether they’re in the Cloud or on-premise, all from a single interface. Using Flowgear’s platform, developers and non-technical users can create, edit and manage enterprise-grade integrations for businesses, customers and suppliers. It offers a code free, drag and drop visual designer which includes a library of prebuilt Connectors and templates. The cloud-based platform enables users to create…
$1,499
per month per installation
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
IBM’s App Connect is a cloud-based data integration platform with data mapping and transformation capabilities within connectors between high-volume systems. App Connect also offers near-real time data synchronization and an API builder that is adaptable to the user’s coding skill level.N/A
Pricing
FlowgearIBM App Connect
Editions & Modules
Base
$1,499
per month per installation
Standard
$2,499
per month per installation
Professional
$3,999
per month per installation
Enterprise
$7,999
per month per installation
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FlowgearIBM App Connect
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FlowgearIBM App Connect
Considered Both Products
Flowgear
Chose Flowgear
Flow gear is much easier to use with alot of functionality and processes that are readily available. Support is great as well as having indept learning videos and guides. Efficiency and productivity scores a 10 out of 10 when trying to find quick and easy solutions that are …
Chose Flowgear
From a cost perspective, for what it provides and delivers compared to its rivals, its functionality is right up there. If you're looking to get started with a Saas platform, there really is no better tool than Flowgear.
Chose Flowgear
Flowgear has solved our problem in getting our integration and mapping out faster. Easily being able to change workflows and great with facilitating a production ready product through its CI\CD functionalities. Taking the products through various stages of development ensures …
IBM App Connect
Chose IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect started as MQSeries Integrator (MQSI) more than 20 years ago. In the IT environment, this is like an eternity. And this allowed a lot of customer experience and needs to be embedded in the product. Without it becoming a legacy application. The changes done in …
Chose IBM App Connect
I used the IBM WebSphere DataStage tool which is an ETL tool where we extract transform and load. This tool is a little tougher to understand than App Connect. For example, to build a job in App Connect is easier than DataStage. We can schedule the job to run in the same …
Chose IBM App Connect

IBM API Connect is positioned ahead of Apigee in the Gartner report. But in my opinion the development experience and the data transformation capability is way better in Apigee and it’s a proved solution and has a huge client list. (I have worked on an American Express …

Chose IBM App Connect
We did not select Cast Iron as our iPaaS solution, it was the weakest competitor in the field that we evaluated. Our experience was that it was not nearly as easy to learn, without in-depth training and guidance, and the developer UI was extremely buggy. We subjected each of …
Chose IBM App Connect
WebSphereCast Iron is preferred for our sales and delivery teams over Informatica. We find the products and teams for WebSphere Cast Iron easier to work with here and find WebSphere Cast Iron better when integrating with non-Salesforce systems.
WebSphere Cast Iron struggles to …
Chose IBM App Connect
We selected IBM App Connect Enterprise due to our confidence in IBM as a long-term partner and our history with their integration technology (Message Broker/Bus). IBM App Connect provides the robustness and high reliability needed for our core on-premises systems, with proven …
Chose IBM App Connect
The choice of IBM App Connect was a strategic decision driven by the urgent need for agile, user-friendly, and cost-effective application and data integration. While DataPower, webMethods, and API Connect are powerful tools in their own rights, their primary focuses as security …
Features
FlowgearIBM App Connect
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Flowgear
8.8
Ratings
9% above category average
IBM App Connect
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Pre-built connectors9.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Connector modification8.80 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration9.10 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data quality services8.90 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data security features9.20 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Monitoring console8.00 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FlowgearIBM App Connect
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Zapier
Zapier
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Azure Logic Apps
Azure Logic Apps
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FlowgearIBM App Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FlowgearIBM App Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
Flowgear has been exceptionally well suited to automate workflows allowing my product to interface with other products without the need for my team to develop these integration points. The ability to run workflows against multiple environments, in a secure manner, has facilitated rapid development of key client requirements and aided my team in delivering a quality solution.
Read full review
IBM App Connect is well-suited to serve as a central integration hub, particularly for scenarios involving data transformation, complex routing logic, and dynamic backend routing. It excels at enabling legacy system modernization and supports real-time, event-driven architectures effectively. However, it is less appropriate for simple point-to-point integrations or for use cases requiring workflow process management and human task orchestration, where BPM or lightweight automation tools may be more suitable.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy node code front end
  • Excellent Customer Service
  • Adding new pre-built integrations on a regular basis
Read full review
  • Just the ability to display and consume data through a single dashboard makes this a great application for our business purposes.
  • With the ability to consume their exposed API, data validation and manipulation becomes a breeze.
Read full review
Cons
  • Learning should be easy for even a beginner
  • Users may find the platform a bit overwhelming if they do not understand it
Read full review
  • The UI crashed constantly while trying to develop integrations.
  • The UI was not nearly as intuitive as many of its competitors in the iPaaS space, which lead to a much larger learning curve.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It is the best on-premise application to cloud integration in the market. I guess IBM is planning to integrate IBM App Connect with the IBM API Connect solution.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
You can do some really powerful things with this system. The overall design is an attempt to make configurable some of the routine tasks/common functionality, but allow for development/customization of the core of the application.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Support is good, however it takes longer than expected to get responses. When bugs are reported they often seem to fall into a black hole.
Read full review
Online Training
Training material is excellent with in depth videos and material that are readily available and easy to understand. Materials are upgraded when new features are out. First time users do not find it difficult to follow and understand all modules. Tests are easily completed due to this. Overall training was great
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Flowgear has solved our problem in getting our integration and mapping out faster. Easily being able to change workflows and great with facilitating a production ready product through its CI\CD functionalities. Taking the products through various stages of development ensures that we are always able to test extensively first and then get our integration working in a production ready environment.
Read full review
We selected IBM App Connect Enterprise due to our confidence in IBM as a long-term partner and our history with their integration technology (Message Broker/Bus). IBM App Connect provides the robustness and high reliability needed for our core on-premises systems, with proven scalability to the cloud. Its key strength is enabling deep integration by combining low-code with the power of complex, custom logic, ensuring the platform's capabilities exactly matched our need to handle complex flows.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • increased productivity
  • efficiency
  • and reduced time and costs
Read full review
  • We can integrate different applications in just few hours
  • We can validate the received/sent messages
  • We can monitor any error appeared in the flows
Read full review
ScreenShots

Flowgear Screenshots

Screenshot of Pricing ModelScreenshot of Flowgear Key FeaturesScreenshot of High Cadence Value PropositionsScreenshot of No CodeScreenshot of Design Canvas and Activity LogsScreenshot of Sample workflow - Import Sales and Purchase Order