FogBugz vs. Koala

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FogBugz
Score 2.6 out of 10
N/A
A software project management system used to plan, track and release great software with this lightweight and customizable system that integrates into any project management workflow. FogBugz is designed for software development teams and includes all the project management tools developers need straight out of the box. Users can: Track projects from start to finish - With tasks and subtasks for each case with required details and track them to ensure…
$62
per month
Koala
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Koala is presented as a speedy QA tool for web and mobile project teams from the company based in Austin, TX, that provides a simple point and click web tool for feedback from clients or testers. A limited plan is available free for one project, and it is available without limits for a subscription.N/A
Pricing
FogBugzKoala
Editions & Modules
3 Years
$62
per month
2 years
$64
per month
1 Year
$68
per month
Monthly
$75
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FogBugzKoala
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FogBugzKoala
User Ratings
FogBugzKoala
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FogBugzKoala
Likelihood to Recommend
Fogbugz is great for case-and-task based businesses. If your business has hundreds of weekly anticipated tasks that exist, such as processes to get files converted, Fogbugz can manage these processes very well. For our team, we knew each week that we would have about 500 tasks or orders to get processed. Fogbugz helped us break down these projects, get them assigned evenly throughout the team, and easily see who is working on what task. FogBugz is also good for tracking unanticipated tasks like bugs, making notes, flowcharts, and categorizing if the problem is a bug, feature request, etc. For us, it was just the best at nailing down those anticipated tasks.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Good for documenting
  • Good for attaching things
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Workflow capability is very limited to the original implementation, could use a refresh and extension of the capabilities
  • UI/UX needs improvement. This was in the works prior to purchase by DevFactory, and has taken a back seat to backend improvements that rightfully needed to be fixed first.
  • Pricing model doesn't fit our usage very well, so we're paying for full-featured users for everyone even though the majority of Users only need to submit Cases and modify the Wikis, and our small percentage of Users are in Dev and need all features.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
FogBugz is made for the Developers who actually use it every day, while JIRA is made for the C-Suite who oversees them but has little idea of the finer points of daily dev tasks. In reality, most don't fit into the mold of JIRA tickets, and the summarized information that C-Suite is reviewing is incomplete or skewed. There is also an outstanding issue since 2004 that JIRA refuses to implement despite wide user support, the merging of tickets. You can see the open ticket with the JIRA team here: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRACLOUD-3592
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Less downtime of jobs. It is each person's responsibility to check their list to see if they have any pending work.
  • When people are out sick or busy, a supervisor can easily shift work from one person to another who many have time to cover work.
  • Management has a quick view into seeing what is happening with a job and can use it as a tool to request addiional resources as needed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots