Folloze's no-code digital experience platform enables B2B marketing and sales teams to deliver personalized buyer experiences across the customer journey. It's used to create digital destinations for use cases including ABM/ABX campaigns, website engagement, sales development, and event activation.
N/A
StackAdapt
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
StackAdapt, headquartered in Toronto offers their native advertising specialized DSP, supporting programmatic advertising with audience discovery, B2B targeting, and engagement analytics among other features.
Folloze is a cost-friendly solution that helped in reducing cost and increase ROI (Return On Investment) The set of features offered in Folloze enables clear view of leads and email engagements The analytics module provides greater insights over email campaigns
Folloze is in a league of it's own when comparing it to previous resources our team has leveraged in the past. The biggest part of this statement really comes down to the integration piece. Whether it's Google Analytics or Marketo, Folloze has truly set the bar on being able to …
Folloze offers much more robust and sophisticated solutions compared to Pathfactory. The microsite building experience is moons ahead of Pathfactory and is far more intuitive. The user experience is much more friendly and easy on the brain. I don't often find myself getting …
Folloze has proven to absolutely stand head and shoulders above its competitors. Folloze actually integrates nicely with 6Sense or Demandbase to pull data from a CRM. Folloze seemed to have a simpler interface, and that was key when it came to enabling our sales org to use …
Folloze does so much more than the other tools we evaluated, like PathFactory and Uberflip. Those other solutions are more of a content repository with AI to help guide the visitor's experience. While this is powerful, Folloze goes a step further by making a full web page …
In looking at solutions that are robust, Folloze was selected because it was very simple to use. As I have mentioned, we had our first page done in a week. Looking at other solutions that are just a piece of software meant for other tasks, they had significant setup, greater …
Folloze is a lot easier to use vs. Drupal when building out pages. The look of Drupal is not as pleasing to the eyes as the way you can customize it on Folloze. Folloze also does not require any coding, so it takes away the complication and chances of "missed codes" or errors …
Folloze has a much better interface with creating microsites. PathFactory has a lot of good content stream goals, but as far as microsites and template, Folloze has more experience and capability to make it an easier and more scalable solution.
Folloze as a tool was actually integrated into our Dun & Bradstreet Rev.Up subscription, which means we're able to collect additional visitor data that's available on the D&B side when someone visits our Folloze pages. As compared to Marketo landing pages, or UnBounce, …
We only selected folloze because it was easy, effective and understandable, and even the folloze team was helpful to make us understand. We thank folloze being such a great support & partner with our projects and seasonal campaigns. Adding pixels will be a game changer.Thank …
PathFactory was not as great a creator or user experience. The page layouts were limiting and more difficult to measure in terms of user engagement. The look was not as clean an modern.
We reviewed Folloze against path factory and Adobe but found the platforms to be less agile, and the ability to get started would require significant resources and timelines. We found Folloze to have great intent connections and focused more on being a landing page than a …
With Google Ads you are able to set your budget and work within it. However, it is pay per click so the price does increase substantially. StackAdapt seems more budget friendly.
StackAdapt has an easier self-serve platform than JamLoop, where you can also buy programmatic CTV and display banners. Though they lack audio placements, which is another cross-channel tactic in StackAdapt to reach the same audience with multiple formats. Comparable CPM rates …
We have evaluated Criteo because we have many eCommerce clients. But we decided against it because StackAdapt seems to have much better and complete targeting options and ways to optimize campaigns post-launch, whereas Criteo feels more like a "spray & pray" approach. …
We selected StackAdapt because we thought they would provide us with a greater ROI for our prospecting campaigns and retargeting campaigns. Unfortunately, we had a problem with the prospecting campaigns which was that we had a very huge audience segment to target so it does not …
StackAdapt is significantly less expensive than the Trade Desk. StackAdapt doesn't have campaign minimums, unlike the Trade Desk, meaning you can experiment with a lower ad spend to gain client confidence before investing at a larger level. Plus they don't lock you into an …
Even though we find the StackAdapt UI clunky and not intuitive, it's a huge step up from the Basis UI. We previously used Basis and ran all the media ourselves, and there were spend thresholds we had to hit with Basis that often made it a constraining platform to use. …
Much better in terms of audience definition and campaign control. We found AdRoll to be relatively easy to use, but light in terms of campaign parameters, whereas StackAdapt is also easy to use but allows us to be completely in the driver's seat.
I couldn't find Teads in the dropdown, but that's what I'd most compare StackAdapt too. Both generated strong results for our various clients and campaigns run on the platforms, but overall, I've been far more impressed with StackAdapt. Not only is StackAdapt's dashboard …
Basis is great for display ads. StackAdapt, however, is in a completely different world when it comes to NAtie ADvertising. Typical DSPs like Basis do not come close to comparing.
In terms of Native advertising, StackAdapt blows Outbrain and Taboola out of the water. The ability to drive impressions is similar between all three, but we have seen a large improvement in the quality of these impressions from StackAdapt. Clicks, engagement, and sales are all …
StackAdapt's video capabilities perform in-line with what we have seen from Sharethrough, but without any minimums attached to their campaigns. As far as Nativo, their traffic was lower, but the quality of those sessions was better. As far as re-targeting capabilities, we have …
StackAdapt has better support, better integration, is easier to work with, and listens to customers. Other platforms serve up a take-it-or-leave-it attitude to all but the largest customers.
I have been using Folloze for a long time, and I will recommend Folloze because of the app's user-friendly interface and responsiveness to customer feedback. It also enhances security with SSO, two-factor authentication, and a personalization tool. Overall, there are more pros, and it increases productivity.
Campaigns for Brand Awareness: StackAdapt works effectively in campaigns for brand awareness where expanding brand visibility and reaching a large audience are the main objectives. Advertisers can target particular demographics, hobbies, and behaviors with its sophisticated targeting features, making sure that the correct audience groups receive brand messaging.
Communication: Their reps are incredibly transparent, thorough and detailed. I really, really appreciate that.
Creativity: Not only are the reps communicative, they actually bring new, fresh ideas to the table. As busy as we are, I can't thank them enough for that.
Easy-to-use: As detailed as the dashboard is, it's actually pretty easy to use and bring new users up-to-speed on.
Integrating the contact form with our CRM has been a lengthy and on-going process
We use iframe for some of our content pieces and I think it could look better than it does now
We need licenses for our salespeople for them to get access to insights of a board. An easier way to send them this info without them needing licenses would be nice
There has been occasional slopping maintenance of the campaigns, and we have to follow up with questions about spending spikes or significant changes in delivery CPMs.
Account rep knowledge can sometimes be lacking. When we question our reps about performance, we sometimes get confusing or nonsensical answers.
The reporting UI is definitely clunky and unintuitive.
Without Folloze, the marketing team would not be able to pivot as quickly as we do to support sellers with deal acceleration and drive executive engagement.
The platform is easy to use and understand whether it is being used as self-serve or a managed service. The audience targeting is solid, and array of placements is versatile. With these, the level of engagement for video content is usually great
Its great to be able to customize and build experiences without having to depend web developers or larger content teams. Using Folloze doesn't require a web developer or complicated coding language. Its quite intuitive and easy to figure out after building an experience or two. If you are stuck their support and training materials are quite helpful, as is their support team. Although the tool is great, it would be great to see even more customization possibilities. Also the reporting interface is pretty cumbersome and would benefit from added functionality.
It is very user friendly and if any team members need further help, we are able to easily access their customer service team for hands on assistance with an actual human being, not a robot. Their team has been incredibly kind, understanding and thorough. It is really a great all in one tool for a business who relies greatly on advertising campaigns.
Folloze has a very intuitive user interface and designer. Their integrations have been seamless, and their team has been extremely helpful and responsive in getting features added or any gaps addressed. We have been leveraging the tool to its full capability, and people are happy both internally as well as externally.
Support has been exceptional. Our dedicated team is always available and ready to answer any questions that may arise. We receive updates from them on a regular basis and they go above and beyond providing assistance when needed. The team is absolutely one of the bright spots in our relationship with StackAdapt
Folloze offers much more robust and sophisticated solutions compared to PathFactory. The microsite building experience is moons ahead of PathFactory and is far more intuitive. The user experience is much more friendly and easy on the brain. I don't often find myself getting lost in Folloze, whereas I would get lost all the time in PathFactory.
StackAdapt has an easier self-serve platform than JamLoop, where you can also buy programmatic CTV and display banners. Though they lack audio placements, which is another cross-channel tactic in StackAdapt to reach the same audience with multiple formats. Comparable CPM rates on CTV, and customer support on both is similarly strong.
A sales were able to give valuable presentations which aided in earning key accounts in O&G & utility industries.
A sales exec was able to close a million-dollar sale that she had been working on closing for a year. This board was a great visual to the customer, which helped in closing.