Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. OneTrust Privacy Automation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Forcepoint DLP
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
Forcepoint DLP promises to address human-centric risk by providing visibility and control everywhere your people work and everywhere your data resides. Security teams apply user-risk scoring to focus on the events that matter most and to accelerate compliance with global data regulations. The vendor promises these benefits: Accelerate compliance Empower people to protect data Advanced detection and controls that follow the data RESPOND…N/A
OneTrust Privacy Automation
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
The OneTrust Privacy Automation solution is used to simplify compliance, improve operational efficiency, and enable risk-informed decisions.N/A
Pricing
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionOneTrust Privacy Automation
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Forcepoint DLPOneTrust Privacy Automation
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionOneTrust Privacy Automation
Considered Both Products
Forcepoint DLP
Chose Forcepoint DLP
I think Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pales in comparison to the feature set you get with M365 (which is likely included in most corporations existing licensing!). We moved on from Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention to implement Microsoft's solution instead.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We tested and evaluated Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and this solution suited the best for our requirement. We optimized it to suit our requirement of 250 to 300 users in our head office. We will be adding a few more users under this solution which are having Windows and MAC …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
I find Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention to be a superior product compared to the other two alternatives mentioned. It is improving, though, at a slower pace but I have seen it upgrading to its best level. There is more value associated with this tool than the other two. …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Because it allows the creation of reports and statistics, risk assessment, real-time monitoring, fingerprints, machine learning, [and] a dictionary function--so good and useful.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
I have evaluated CoSoSys but the reporting part did not hit the mark. Also, a high number of false positives was a concern for me. I need a predefined report which needs to be compatible with my compliance requirement, which was missing in CoSoSys. However CoSoSys is good for …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We have not done a ton of testing with alternatives at this point.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Netskope, Digital Guardian. We've stuck with Forcepoint to limit the number of major architectural changes in a given year. If we achieved diminishing marginal returns on its ROI, then we'd change because the prevention is good, but the headache has to be less than the …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We have tried out Office 365 and Trend Micro DLP but those solutions have not worked out as we hoped. That said, when we looked at Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, there were only minor issues we came across that did not have any negative impact and overall, the solution was …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but Proofpoint has proven to be a superior product. In our experience Proofpoint has fewer false positives and more out-of-the-box pattern detections requiring less customization. However, there is still a value in having more than one DLP …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Haven't used other product.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We didn't evaluate any other solutions at the time of purchase. Forcepoint was the leader on the Gartner report and we went with their recommendation.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We selected Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention because it meets the size of our organization's needs and the ease of implementation compared to other solutions.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We selected Forcepoint DLP as we already were using their Web and Email filtering products. The integration among their products is very strong and we did not want to introduce too many additional products into our environment. We have limited security resources so a high level …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Easier to user and cheaper
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We are currently in the evaluation phase to compare overall cost and functionality. Blue Coat runs in a very similar way that Forcepoint does. Check Point runs at the same gateway layer that the firewall does so its policy can be run on the same hardware of existing environments.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint stacks up pretty well against its competitors. It has more functionality then Cisco and is comparable to McAfee. McAfee is one of the few I would feel at ease with replacing our currently solution with.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Overall it was the best we had, SSL decryption worked better than Bluecoat and Cisco traffic had a lot of certificate issues. Websense was the quickest to get up and running and their sales engineering team is superb.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Websense has similar features to other DLP solutions. We selected Websense based upon other organizations' experiences. I cannot compare the negatives to Websense as we did not deploy any other vendor DLP solutions in the same scale.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Websense, at the time, was the only content filtering solution to offer a hybrid option of on-prem and cloud services. We are up for renewal soon and will likely compare them to other vendors.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Websense gave us the best flexibility for our enterprise configuration and setup. It all does not take up anything on our computers when we use Websense one armed off our firewalls and routers. We found this very easy to set up and transparent to our users and network. The …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We've been using Websense for as long as I've been at Heitman. I had a talk with Mimecast about email filtering but it's hard to find someone that does web, email, and DLP together; it doesn't make sense to have 3 different vendors.
OneTrust Privacy Automation
Chose OneTrust Privacy Automation
First, when we compare OneTrust Privacy and Data Governance Cloud to the software I mentioned above, OneTrust Privacy and Data Governance Cloud software was way more affordable than the other 2. Also, along with the other 2 software, OnTrust was one of the most user friendly …
Chose OneTrust Privacy Automation
OneTrust is designed to focus on privacy management, the other tools are tailored for privacy but not primarily focused on privacy management.
Chose OneTrust Privacy Automation
When we started looking at privacy management tools, OneTrust stood out in its ability to streamline compliance globally where it's not just siloed to one department or one location. The convenience of OneTrust is that it is very flexible and the beauty of the platform is how …
Chose OneTrust Privacy Automation
OneTrust has outstanding policy management, which equips every employee with the right direction in terms of understanding and compliance. Further, the scanning of the website remains vital and resourceful, as it gives proper management of the cookies. Again, OneTrust the …
Chose OneTrust Privacy Automation
OneTrust was the chosen platform after an extensive evaluation process that commenced with RFPs (Request For Proposal) issued to about 30 companies with similar services.
Chose OneTrust Privacy Automation
We evaluated Clarip, but it is not showing up on this list. It is a similar solution to OneTrust but provides a much more broad scope including full automation of processes to delete and access customer information based on requests. They were exponentially more expensive than …
Features
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionOneTrust Privacy Automation
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
2.0
Ratings
102% below category average
OneTrust Privacy Automation
-
Ratings
Data Encryption2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionOneTrust Privacy Automation
Small Businesses
Paubox Email Suite
Paubox Email Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionOneTrust Privacy Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
2.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
2.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionOneTrust Privacy Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
-Where companies need to secure their attachment, which goes outside, means from their company to outside -Where companies need to ensure their client's personal information -Where companies need DLP. They need to look for Forcepoint only, as they have the upper hand over the rest of their competitors.
Read full review
OneTrust offers the monitoring, the assessment, and the verification process of data, a formal way of ensuring the results outlined are correct, understandable, and confined. Besides, the policy and the website scanners from OneTrust are incredible, virtual, and concrete. Besides, OneTrust outlines the risk management options, with the customer mapping and taking the required assessments. Lastly, websites and cookies are efficiently scanned and made efficient for concrete business management.
Read full review
Pros
  • The Forcepoint Endpoint Data Loss Prevention Endpoint module is applied to secure data being used at endpoints, like from Microsoft Excel and other Microsoft capabilities, also other functions like email and FTP, Active Sync, etc. It secures the data in use at the endpoint.
  • The Forcepoint Endpoint Data Loss Prevention Network Module is applied for the traffic being used in network capabilities like email, FTP, and web. It also secures the data on the move in the network.
  • Forcepoint Data Discover--the capability to discover the data which is sensitive for the organization and lies across the network; with the discovery tool, we can define the data, which is important based on regulatory and compliance risk.
  • OCR (optical character recognition) capabilities also come with the Data Discover Module, by which we can see the embedded text inside the image and that helps to prevent sensitive data theft.
Read full review
  • Help us process DSR or Data subject Request efficiently
  • Goes particularly well with our most useful device which is Iterable.
  • User friendly interface
Read full review
Cons
  • Remote filtering is not as advanced as we would like.
  • Support time is not as quick as needed in most cases.
  • Upgrades of appliances and software is not as easy as other solutions.
  • HTTPS inspection needs to hand a valid cert and doesnt work correctly with all vendors.
Read full review
  • I had a hard time trying to figure how to save the cookie settings correctly.
  • Integrate OneTrust with other systems is not automatic.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have been fairly happy with the product and how it has worked. We have looked at other vendors for url filter and such and have not found one that meets our needs or does what we have been doing with Websense. The product has been fairly stable and we have only had a few issues in the past. We have all seen that it was one of the highest leaders from the Gartner Group Magic Quadrant for Web Gateways.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
For us, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention was difficult to administer, did not work well when it did work, was incredibly expensive for the feature set you get, and was difficult to uninstall when we moved on from the software. Once it was fully set up, it worked occasionally for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
We have used a shared hosted tenant managed by OneTrust for over three years with only one instance of a lengthy (4+ hours) unexpected outage which happened years ago.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
We selected a European hosting location based on our initial use case, however, our usage of the OneTrust platform has expanded globally to where the majority of users sit in the Americas or Asia-Pacific regions. There is a noticeable lag when navigating the platform for users located far away from the hosting location.
As a user, you can mitigate any sluggish response time by the aggressive use of multiple browser tabs. I commonly have one tab open on an Inventory detail screen, another tab on an Assessment window, and maybe another tab on a customized inventory list screen. If one tab is slow I hop to another tab and work on that tab while the first tab responds.
Read full review
Support Rating
Support from Forcepoint has been lacking. When calling in with a high priority issue we rarely are able to work with a technician immediately. The queue waits are very long and when you get through there are no support engineers available and we need to wait for a call back for hours it seems.
Read full review
Both our customer rights access and cookie consent advisors were responsive and helpful in getting us trained on using the platform and the various assets implemented on our website. We had multiple training sessions that were more than enough in getting all of the users on our team familiar with what we needed to do.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
An implementation specialist worked with us remotely during our initial deployment. Due to the diverse geographic locations of my organization's participants, the implementation and training had to be done remotely (this was before COVID-driven remote work).
The implementation specialist was knowledgeable and helpful but to really get full benefit from the platform I encourage organizations to dedicate a specialist within your company to really study and learn the platform.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and start utilizing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention solution.
Read full review
OneTrust is designed to focus on privacy management, the other tools are tailored for privacy but not primarily focused on privacy management.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
The platform has exceptional capabilities to customize the user interface, reports, and recorded information. In most cases, the customization can be compartmentalized so that if the customization performed for Department A is determined to not impact Department B, the customization can be hidden from Department B.
We have four different departments using the IT Risk Management module. Three departments share their work in what we call the 'shared data risk management zone'. Another department is using IT Risk Management for a bespoke portfolio risk management task, and the customization for this department is largely hidden from the other departments.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The capability of this tool to update in real time has saved a lot of time and even saved a lot of energy for researching.
  • The exchange of financial information related to customers builds up an extreme risk of data loss, which can be damaging to the customer.
Read full review
  • We are able to quantify the number of business and technical processes assisted by the governance specialists
  • The governance specialists that use the platform are more effective and efficient.
Read full review
ScreenShots