FulFillor vs. Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud

Easy to implement, easy to operate, it must expand its portfolio options to be able to operate all the logistics processes of the warehouses.

Incentivized

• Manage a lot of information - we manage 600+ stores of various sizes with millions of products across them to manage. Oracle Warehouse Management cloud is able to handle all our data.
• It has a lot of parametrization inside - when we add a new store, we are able to do so easily, no matter its size.
• It's flexible - adding new information, stores, or changing information is easy to do.
• It's scalable - again, as we add or change stores, we are able to do so with this software.

Incentivized

• We can enter manual entries into Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud and all manual entries do not have proper control.
• It performs slow when it must extract the data in large amounts.
• Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud doesn’t maintain sales return entries because it’s not an order management system. In order to use this feature, we need to configure or deploy another solution, which is Order Management System. We cannot consider it as a demerit of Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud but for a single feature, we cannot deploy another module. .

Incentivized

Because is slow, they don't know much and take a lot of time to resolve something.

Incentivized

We are using these services in our warehouses for managing all our inventory and warehouses for almost 11 years now. With the help of this tool, we were able to track our inventory status more accurately and get a timely update if the inventory is low. It is highly flexible you can easily add new product information or change some information. The interface is very easy to use

Incentivized

• We have reduced our manned power.
• Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud helped us to increase our productivity by system automation.
• We are managing our warehouse operations in a large numbers.

Incentivized