Function Point is a project management software built specifically for ad agencies, design studios, and marketing departments.
$46
per month per user
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
InEight's modular project controls software connects complex project data to improve visibility and delivery in capital construction.
N/A
Pricing
Function Point Productivity Software
InEight
Editions & Modules
Agency (30-49)
$46
per month per user
Studio (10-29)
$48
per month per user
Boutique (5-9)
$52
per month per user
Enterprise
Call for Pricing
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Function Point Productivity Software
InEight
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Customers save 11% on annual billing. Demo’s available.
InEight offers a modular, integrated project controls platform. Because the InEight platform covers the entire construction lifecycle, customers purchase the software based on their specific needs – purchasing stand-alone products, a bundle of products, or the entire platform. As a result, the pricing will vary depending on the specific product, number of users and length of contract. Once InEight has identified the highest impact areas, they offer potential customers a custom proposal. The options they consider include:
Per user pricing: typically annual subscriptions.
Revenue-based: using a percentage of the customer’s revenue.
Project-based: software use dedicated to a specific project or program of work.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Function Point Productivity Software
InEight
Features
Function Point Productivity Software
InEight
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Function Point Productivity Software
7.9
6 Ratings
3% above category average
InEight
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
7.96 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
7.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
5.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
6.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.56 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Function Point Productivity Software
9.0
6 Ratings
18% above category average
InEight
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates
9.66 Ratings
00 Ratings
Invoicing
9.66 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Function Point Productivity Software
-
Ratings
InEight
6.9
15 Ratings
10% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
7.312 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.214 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
5.914 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
8.114 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Function Point Productivity Software
-
Ratings
InEight
6.9
16 Ratings
9% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing
00 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
00 Ratings
7.015 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
00 Ratings
7.913 Ratings
Photo documentation
00 Ratings
7.412 Ratings
Jobsite reports
00 Ratings
8.16 Ratings
Document sharing
00 Ratings
5.716 Ratings
RFI tools
00 Ratings
5.213 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
00 Ratings
7.514 Ratings
As-built drawings
00 Ratings
6.214 Ratings
Mobile app
00 Ratings
7.710 Ratings
Submittal design and management
00 Ratings
6.610 Ratings
Checklists
00 Ratings
7.69 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
00 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Specifications
00 Ratings
6.69 Ratings
Change orders
00 Ratings
6.19 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
It's definitely a good tool for progress tracking, as well as time tracking. The ability to forecast quantities provide an even better scenario, closer to the reality, supporting even change management. The change management is also a good method, besides the fact of rework if you think in the whole process of issue creation, promoting to PCO, promote to CCO, execute the issue, move to change in controls, and so on... just now I think having all in a single place would minimize the manual work and maybe increase the engagement on it. About a negative point, I'd use a feature that appears to be in all modules. It's pretty much a cosmetic, but it impact in the productivity, a lot. For all fields you will fill with information, whenever your mouse hover over it, a tooltip appears, impeding you to continue, so you have to walk around, click in a place that's not being covered by that tooltip, go back to your keyboard and continue... again, it's a cosmetic, but having this in a Monday, with a full job to plan, claim quantities, and whatever else, it's annoying.
Time tracking - like several time tracking solutions, FP uses a clock that will track in real time so that you do not need to remember how long you worked on a project to input later.
Dashboards - I love FP's dashboards that let me track my personal utilization, the utilization of my team members and all of my open tasks.
Reporting - FP's reports provide insight organization-wide into how we are doing and where we (as an organization) are spending our time. As with any reporting, though, it is important to manage the cleanliness of your data to make the reporting useful.
User defined views and descriptions for all screens.
Customizable ribbons to provide an efficient use of the software.
Multiple layers/dependents to allow for an extreme drill down of the work and the ability to roll up to a more useful level for upper management review.
You can bid the work as you would build it, in detail.
Function Point often provided reports that were inaccurate due to bad calculations. The support team would work with us to troubleshoot these issues, but the fact remained that calculations were wrong.
Function Point was purchased by a new parent company that increased prices over their nearest, superior, competitor, pricing themselves out of the market.
Function Point's interface is dated, as is its code base.
New features are being implemented not as software revisions or upgrades, but as new for-pay features.
Provide a simpler version (cliff notes) of the knowledge database
Offer versions of InEight for smaller companies, i.e. less than 20 emplyees, under $5M in revenue
When an estimate is complete, offer a dialog box to ask if the job was won, lost, or still in progress. We tend to leave most of our estimates in the bidding column. This is a user error, but the prompt would be helpful.
Some features with InEight's TeamBinder are worthy of single use, however the review feature and subsequent revision and version numbering could be improved. We will be aiming to roll out the package to encompass our internal documentation in the near future and will be in a better position to judge the usability after that point in time.
I would give it an 8 out of 10 because the software can be a bit cumbersome to new users. It also takes a long time to set up the library and input all of your companies needs so that the software will provide the level of service required to estimate projects. However, once the software is set up it is a powerful tool. We only use a portion of what the software is capable of delivering
We are new to the use of the system, and so far, we have not reached out for any support. The only support we have requested so far is the development of a training program that involves other staff - some are to learn the use of the program, and some are for informational purposes in understanding the capabilities of InEight.
Since the original inception, I have been required to overhaul the system so that it is more user friendly and combines both aspects of our business, documentation and drawings. Being able to control revision and version numbering has been a key struggle that only staff training has been able to mark this as complete.
Workamajig was NOT a good fit, after over a year of back-end setup. FunctionFox didn't have the financial integration capabilities we needed, but we used it for years and were happy with the service and support. FunctionPoint brought together the 30,000-foot view of the projects and resources with a simplified process for getting day-to-day jobs into the queue, which was essential for our organization.
We looked at HCSS and Bid 2 Win but chose Ineight due to the fact that it seemed more user friendly, plus I had used it at a former company when it was available from the Grantlun Corporation and was very familiar with it in its ease of use and reliability.
InEight is a good system that has scaled nicely as the company has grown. the tools are still readily available and applicable for our larger scope of work. It has kept up with the growth of the company very nicely