| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Gem | Score9.5 out of 10 | N/A | Gem is a recruiting platform that brings together ATS, CRM, sourcing, scheduling, and analytics — plus 650+ million profiles to source from — with AI built into every workflow. | $300 per month |
| Gem | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | Discount for annual pricing. | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Gem | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Gem It fits with Greenhouse well, we have it as an extra tool to accommodate the GH functions. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Gem We also use Eightfold, but I think we are going to move away from that and just keep GEM. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Gem Gem is more comprehensive; all of the tools listed above create something like Gem but alone are very siloed. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Gem The UI is way better and cleaner and the fact that you can create drip campaigns is a major game changer. The one way it could improve is to include a mass download feature so you don't have to do 1 profile at a time. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Gem | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.5 |
