GemStone/S vs. Neo4j

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GemStone/S
Score 3.0 out of 10
N/A
GemStone/S is an object-oriented database management sytem presented by the vendor, GemTalk Systems headquartered in Beaverton, as a a state-of-the-art platform for developing, deploying, and managing scalable, high-performance, multi-tier applications based on business objects.N/A
Neo4j
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Neo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden.
$65
per month
Pricing
GemStone/SNeo4j
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Aura Professional
$65
per month
Community Edition
Free
Enterprise Edition
Contact Sales
Aura Free
Free
Aura Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GemStone/SNeo4j
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GemStone/SNeo4j
User Ratings
GemStone/SNeo4j
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
2.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GemStone/SNeo4j
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Its very well suited for storing graph types relationship information, such as a group of people and their relationships. Data modeling this sort of information in a traditional SQL database is a pain and inefficient. Using Neo4J allows for efficient modeling of data while providing rich querying capabilities using Cypher. Its also a great fit for any programming language because of its support for REST API. It's less appropriate for any other data structure other than Graph data. So as with any DB, evaluate the data structure and query and if the querying revolves around relationships, then Neo4J is a fit. If there is more need for looking up individual nodes and their associated information, Neo4J might not be the most efficient solution in the market.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • When joins are a common in a relational store, switching to Neo4j is better
  • When pattern matching and surfacing interesting insights is the goal, neo4j's cypher is pretty powerful
  • When schema is not completely known beforehand and needs to be evolved with time
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • It would be nice to have some concept of namespaces, or some way of roughly making a single instance multi-tenant. It'd be nice to make sandboxing easier.
  • Automatic backups could be improved.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
[Based on] Query Language, Performance on small and large data sets, integration and deployment, analysis, API support, Interactive UI.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I have not used anything like Neo4J because of how unique it is in the work that it allows me to do. I am not aware of any other graph database platforms and it might be because it is a growing area (especially in the world of pharmaceuticals). I would be open to trying other softwares though.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • For experimentation purposes, it had a positive impact on my company. It was very natural to work with Neo4j and so intuitive to visualize the data.
  • Neo4j community edition is free, which is what we experimented on. So there was no investment up front apart from employee's time. But this quickly gave results and it was time well spent.
  • Neo4j is a cool but very new technology. It was hard to have people onboard, especially some of the leadership and relational folks.
Read full review
ScreenShots