Genesys PureConnect (discontinued) vs. HockeyStack

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Genesys PureConnect was an omnichannel contact center platform that offered cloud-based or on-premise deployments. It featured a SIP-based architecture with VoIP capabilities, allowing companies to connect legacy voice systems and use existing phones. A legacy product, new users are encouraged to investigate Genesys Cloud.N/A
HockeyStack
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
HockeyStack is a SaaS analytics platform that unites marketing, revenue and product data, so that marketing & growth teams understand the drivers of product engagement and high quality leads, and increase revenue faster than ever.
$0
Pricing
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)HockeyStack
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
Accelerate
$99
Boost
$249
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)HockeyStack
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)HockeyStack
Considered Both Products
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
PureConnect was selected 20 years ago, and it does show its age a little -- but like a high-quality machine tool, it continues to deliver value far longer than anyone expected.
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
We used PureConnect before moving to Cloud CX. The PureConnect had more features and functions at the time we switched, but Cloud CX has been making up ground to compete feature to feature with their on-premise solutions.
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
I've only used two other Contact Center software applications in the past years ago that I can't remember the name of right now. But, I do remember years ago when I start to use [Genesys] PureConnect as a [first] level agent that it was way better than the previous software I …
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Genesys is for contact centers who are looking for more value-add from their data. Avaya and Cisco traditionally have not had these types of capabilities from my experience. Integrations are much more robust, and many of the functions are customizable.
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Call Manager, you had to buy all the components that are out of the box for PureConnect.
The licensing model is more expensive on the Cisco side vs the Genesys PureConnect side.
Lastly was on the Cisco side since you have to connect/integrate all the components on the cisco …
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
Much better features than competing products, and better overall stability and support. Evidenced by being a smaller company that has risen fast in a crowded marketplace to be a solid and fierce competitor.

Cisco, a big competitor just does not have great call center …
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
In our perspective these players were no where in the same league as Genesys and yes I recognize that Genesys eventually bought Echopass. The only thing better was that we could get line by line interaction data on any inbound or outbound answered or abandoned interaction.
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
I was not involved in the purchase of Genesys PureConnect, so I do not have anything to compare it to. I have been using the product for over 5 years and so far haven't hit any shortcomings within the product.
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
You cannot compare PureConnect to the Nortel 11C that I used to support. They are completely different animals. In regard to the ShoreTel system that I supported, PureConnect was considerably more mature with vastly superior support, documentation and functionality.
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
We have not investigated any other products in the past 4+ years.
Chose Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
CCA was taken over and killed by Oracle so there really is no comparison.
HockeyStack
Chose HockeyStack
No use of cookies and ease to set up was the first thing that attracted us to HockyStacks. For new startups and small business developers, we found the pricing better.
Features
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)HockeyStack
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
7.9
Ratings
5% below category average
HockeyStack
-
Ratings
Agent dashboard6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Validate callers7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Outbound response8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Call forwarding7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Click-to-call (CTC)8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Warm transfer8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive dialing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive voice response8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
REST APIs7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Call scripts8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Call tracking7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Multichannel integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
CRM software integration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)
5.5
Ratings
40% below category average
HockeyStack
-
Ratings
Inbound call routing6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Omnichannel inbound routing6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Recording4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Quality management4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Call analytics3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Historical reporting5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Live reporting6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer surveys8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)HockeyStack
Small Businesses
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
Ortto
Ortto
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.2 out of 10
Quadient Inspire
Quadient Inspire
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
Quadient Inspire
Quadient Inspire
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)HockeyStack
Likelihood to Recommend
5.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
4.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Genesys PureConnect (discontinued)HockeyStack
Likelihood to Recommend
CIC is best suited for business models that rely on heavily leverage Data Integration especially one like ours that require real-time and high-speed data access for billing and customer integration. CIC is not well suited for small organizations < 50 where they are only answering phones in the course of doing business VS. the business is the phone.
Read full review
we need to analyze how users interact with our product page and we also need to know more than that, related to funnels and goals: which types of users are converting the best, where are users dropping off, etc. Helps us focus on our target audience. Overall, Software like this cannot really be criticized. The team releases so many features and keeps adding more to their roadmap. Some minor bugs may appear here and there, but the team quickly resolves them. As I mentioned earlier, lacks a few features compared to Google Analytics but not the major ones.
Read full review
Pros
  • Purely Software Based System: On Microsoft OS. It is an all software-based system making it easy to manage, integrate and interface with other systems
  • One Vendor: All modules, IVR, ACD, Dialer, WFM are from one vendor. So, no compatibility and latency issues at all.
  • Superb Notifier Service: You don't have to restart any process or service for a change to take effect.
Read full review
  • No more third party cookies so perfect for GA alternative
  • Automatic Event Tracking for all Users, Goals, Audiences
  • Clean UI and easy setup
  • Doesn't require you to have a coding knowledge
Read full review
Cons
  • Licensing can be challenging and very expensive.
  • Client templates are hard to administer and are built very different than the rest of the functionality.
  • Web desktop has been slow to come along and include all the features.
  • Optimizer is very sub-par product.
Read full review
  • Not as sophisticated and loved as google analytics
  • lacks some features compared to google analytics again
  • Survey feature is add on and have to pay extra
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We are so embedded on Pure Connect that we like to progress with it. For instance, we are looking into ways to provide different solutions to our customers, help our business to succeed, and work in a better CX.
One of the biggest advantages is that all is in one platform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The interface is only semi user-friendly on almost every front. Agent experience is lacking and we have found many limitations within the system. Workforce forecasting is not as robust as expected. Quality continues to be a struggle. Interaction searches are not robust.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
The application itself uses a hub and spoke model that can help isolate errors in one section of the application from the rest, creating a much more stable overall program. Of all of the outages that we've had with our contact center platform, I can count on one hand how often it was truly a Genesys issue rather than a network issue, server issue or issue with a platform relied upon for an integration (web services, db calls).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Some of the client applications take a bit of time on initial load, but with the move towards web based applications that issue is alleviated. You can tell that effort really isn't putting into the desktop apps any longer and that the client development effort is being put into bringing Interaction Connect closer to feature parity with the desktop (and bringing wholly new features to Connect). As far as IVR operations, web service calls, database operations: they all operate reasonably.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
This really depends if/who your Vendor is or if you purchase directly from Genesys. I would say that whenever I deal with Genesys directly they've always been able to answer my questions and find a resolution to my issues. Unfortunately being on an older version means that answer is usually that you need to spend money to upgrade or move to the cloud
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
I liked the setup of the whole class. The instructor knew the topic well enough to answer questions from entry level to a more advanced one.
Instructor encouraged participation of the whole class and was able to engage every one. Also provided "real live" examples so everyone can relate to it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The online training itself is good. You are provided resources and can self study to a certain point, but the pacing always felt off. Either snails pace or like trying to drink from a fire hose. I think this easily could have had to do with course material and my personal preparations, though. I would say my main gripe is that since the acquisition the team responsible for actually booking training is very unresponsive and often not knowledgeable about the courses they offer. Booking my last training was a real chore.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Don't try to go the perfect solution as a first target. Work on answer the more needs with a simple solution. Then analyse and try again to answer the most needs with adding a bit if complexity only if require. No needs to customise straight from the beginning or deployment takes too long.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Call Manager, you had to buy all the components that are out of the box for PureConnect. The licensing model is more expensive on the Cisco side vs the Genesys PureConnect side. Lastly was on the Cisco side since you have to connect/integrate all the components on the cisco side you have to have so many vendors to install those parts. This drives the cost up even more so it was not worth going that route for our organization.
Read full review
No use of cookies and ease to set up was the first thing that attracted us to HockyStacks. For new startups and small business developers, we found the pricing better.
Read full review
Scalability
Genesys PureConnect's core and adjunct model allows for fairly easy growth in satellite locations via off site session managers, remote located media servers, remote content servers, etc to allow you to spread the infrastructure out while not pushing as much network traffic to your core data centers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We're improving our CX by optimizing our call centers, using additional attributes and keys to identify the best rep for the job.
  • We are also streamlining the journey of each individual customer by using PureConnect as the central interface for omnichannel interactions, allowing us to pick up the conversation where we left off.
  • Using additional attributes that start with the contact center interaction, we're able to track a student journey and proactively step in - increasing our individualized support to focus on the student outcome.
Read full review
  • Easy setup and clean UI/UX - saves time and money in implementation
  • Increased our app downloads with better target audience detection
Read full review
ScreenShots

Genesys PureConnect (discontinued) Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

HockeyStack Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of