GEP SMART vs. Juro

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GEP SMART
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
GEP SMART is a procurement platform, meant as an end-to-end unified procurement solution that provides synergy between finance and purchasing and process fluidity.N/A
Juro
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Juro is a contract collaboration platform that enables businesses to self-serve, agree and manage contracts and their data in one unified workspace. Juro's no-code editor is designed to turn contracts into actionable data, giving users control and visibility at every moment, and empowering teams to self-serve on contracts from what the vendor describes as a beautiful interface that anyone can use.
$450
Per month, minimum 5 users
Pricing
GEP SMARTJuro
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Lite
$450.00
Per month, minimum 5 users
Team
$990.00
Per month, minimum 10 users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GEP SMARTJuro
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GEP SMARTJuro
Considered Both Products
GEP SMART
Chose GEP SMART
No comments.I didn't make the purchasing decision.
Chose GEP SMART
We have used or evaluated Coupa and SAP Ariba primarily.
Chose GEP SMART
We have competitively bid to select GEP and based on the evaluation criteria and pricing proposed, we felt that GEP had the most potential and willingness to work with us. In terms of functionality, I personally think Ariba and Jaggaer have more mature products, but many of …
Chose GEP SMART
We explored and assessed a few other supply management operating systems, and GEP SMART provided the best value for us.
Chose GEP SMART
We selected GEP SMART for its ability to offer a full end-to-end integrated source-to-pay solution, pricing, and ease of use. There was an implementation series offered by GEP, as well as flexibility, customization, account management team dedication, and the overall service …
Chose GEP SMART
At the time of selection, about 4 years ago, GEP offered the best balance of usability, functionality, cost, and partnering for our needs. Since then we have re-evaluated the market and there are now other vendors that offer a better mix, together with a superior innovation …
Chose GEP SMART
When we have evaluated other spending solutions providers, we always select GEP in the end due to the excellent customer service and support that we get from the Technical Team.
Juro
Chose Juro
The AI features seemed better on Juro
Features
GEP SMARTJuro
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
GEP SMART
-
Ratings
Juro
8.7
Ratings
9% above category average
Contract creation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Contract templates00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
GEP SMART
-
Ratings
Juro
7.5
Ratings
10% below category average
Contract sharing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Contract editing00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Approval process00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
GEP SMART
-
Ratings
Juro
7.0
Ratings
17% below category average
Contract database00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Contract search00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Tracking contract status00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GEP SMARTJuro
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Precoro
Precoro
Score 2.8 out of 10
Jotform
Jotform
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GEP SMARTJuro
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
6.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GEP SMARTJuro
Likelihood to Recommend
GEP SMART is well suited to equip procurement professionals to manage multiple RFx's at one point in time and help provide structure to the process. If an organization has an existing ERP and they want to acquire GEP SMART as a bolt-on, then integration is key. If there is any customization then it is more difficult to take advantage of the latest upgrades.
Read full review
Juro is a great platform if you have a mess of managing and keeping track of contracts. With Juro, creating, sharing and tracking the contracts have been so easy
Read full review
Pros
  • The customer service level is incomparable to any other software providers I work with. The GEP Technical Team is very supportive and flexible.
  • The GEP Team takes enhancement requests seriously and always tries to further develop/enhance the tool, especially with small requests from users.
Read full review
  • AI search across all contracts
  • Storing different types of contracts in separate workspaces, with different permissions on each workspace
  • Reminding contract owners when to start discussions on renewals
  • Basic reporting and lists of certain types of contracts for extraction
Read full review
Cons
  • Our organization has yet to take advantage of upgrading to the latest version of GEP SMART. The version that we are on does not make use of the full screen for the different internal windows and pop-up windows. I find it cumbersome to scroll left-right and up-down on the smaller windows when there is much real-estate on the screen that could optimize the user interface.
  • GEP SMART provides technical support but our vendors seem to have some difficulty logging in to their profiles and updating their information. Occasionally, the salesperson delegates to another internal member so we'll have to set up the new member with their log in.
  • The digital signature process requires that the signers of the agreement be defined before the agreement is routed for approval. Sometimes our vendors have a pool of signers that could sign the agreements and it can become a small challenge to change the signers after it has already been defined in GEP SMART.
Read full review
  • I would like to see more in-depth reporting, ability to create graphs etc.
  • Scrolling through lists of contracts could be quicker
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The tool is fantastic, but we are investigating a broader spend management solution at the moment which may mean we look in a different direction for this capability, most likely internally developed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The application is highly usable, but there are some parts of the design that could be improved such as the layout and scaling on the pages, the amount of unused white space within the interface, and the consistency of the interface between modules.
Read full review
It's quite intuitive and easy to use and has a nice UI. Its features offer value for users
Read full review
Performance
The performance of the GEP SMART platform overall has been excellent. We do not hear complaints about system performance and have not experienced any slowdowns in adjacent systems due to the GEP implementation. Of all the (largely self-inflicted) change management challenges we've dealt with, system performance and platform reliability have not been on the list of concerns.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The support team is responsive, smart, and knowledgeable about their product and about our business needs. They are also flexible to respond to questions and find solutions to our requirements.
Read full review
Very helpful support team. Answers as early as possible and clears all questions.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Although we had encountered many bugs, GEP was able to address them quickly, and sent a technical person to sit in our hands-on training sessions to address bugs efficiently
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We selected GEP SMART for its ability to offer a full end-to-end integrated source-to-pay solution, pricing, and ease of use. There was an implementation series offered by GEP, as well as flexibility, customization, account management team dedication, and the overall service and support.
Read full review
The AI features seemed better on Juro
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • GEP SMART has improved our spend analytics speed by allowing analysis to be completed in minutes compared to days when we previously used Excel spreadsheets.
  • The SMART Sourcing (RFX) solution has greatly improved the consistency of our supplier quoting and information gathering process.
Read full review
  • Reduced time spent on new contract checks from 1 hour to 5 minutes
  • Reduced time taken to answer generic questions from the business about our contractual landscape
Read full review
ScreenShots

GEP SMART Screenshots

Screenshot of Landing PageScreenshot of Create Tasks and DocumentsScreenshot of Manage TasksScreenshot of Analytical ReportsScreenshot of Savings Projects - Tracking ResultsScreenshot of Spend Dashboard

Juro Screenshots

Screenshot of A seamless interface, making contract creation easy.Screenshot of A tablet-responsive eSignature solution - sign on any deviceScreenshot of A mobile-responsive eSignature solution - sign on any device