TrustRadius

gINT vs. Honeywell Pulse

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
gINT
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Bentley Systems offers gINT, a set of applications that generate and present subsurface data for mining and other purposes.N/A
Honeywell Pulse
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Honeywell Pulse remotely connects plant managers, supervisors and engineering staff using a mobile application to customized, real-time plant performance notifications sent from Honeywell Process Solutions’ industrial automation software. It enables users to stay connected to their enterprise – wherever they are by extending Honeywell software’s functionality to bring forward condition-based metrics directly to their mobile device.N/A
Pricing
gINTHoneywell Pulse
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
gINTHoneywell Pulse
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
gINTHoneywell Pulse
Considered Both Products
gINT
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose gINT
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, …
Honeywell Pulse

No answer on this topic

User Ratings
gINTHoneywell Pulse
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
gINTHoneywell Pulse
Likelihood to Recommend
Suitable for all organisations that are required to collate, store and generate borehole site logs in a timely and orderly fashion. Can also be used for the storage of .ags data if setup correctly. Handles multiple projects well but is not without hiccups when used regularly. I believe it is possible to draw section views however have not done so myself.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Borehole logs
  • Storage of geotech data.
  • Customisable
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Bugs bugs bugs.
  • Confusing interface.
  • Split-logs cumbersome to generate.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, Holebase feels like a bespoke piece of software.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Central piece of software for collation and storage of all site data.
  • Storage and checker of ags data.
  • Professional looking logs.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots