TrustRadius

gINT vs. IHS Kingdom

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
gINT
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Bentley Systems offers gINT, a set of applications that generate and present subsurface data for mining and other purposes.N/A
IHS Kingdom
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
IHS Markit offers Kingdom, an application which supports asset teams with data critical to geoscience and engineering decisions, and provides portfolio management with the capability to manage millions of wells in a multi-user collaborative environment.N/A
Pricing
gINTIHS Kingdom
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
gINTIHS Kingdom
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
gINTIHS Kingdom
Considered Both Products
gINT
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose gINT
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, …
IHS Kingdom

No answer on this topic

User Ratings
gINTIHS Kingdom
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
gINTIHS Kingdom
Likelihood to Recommend
Suitable for all organisations that are required to collate, store and generate borehole site logs in a timely and orderly fashion. Can also be used for the storage of .ags data if setup correctly. Handles multiple projects well but is not without hiccups when used regularly. I believe it is possible to draw section views however have not done so myself.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Borehole logs
  • Storage of geotech data.
  • Customisable
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Bugs bugs bugs.
  • Confusing interface.
  • Split-logs cumbersome to generate.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, Holebase feels like a bespoke piece of software.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Central piece of software for collation and storage of all site data.
  • Storage and checker of ags data.
  • Professional looking logs.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots