TrustRadius

gINT vs. MineralAnswers.com Payment Solution

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
gINT
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Bentley Systems offers gINT, a set of applications that generate and present subsurface data for mining and other purposes.N/A
MineralAnswers.com Payment Solution
Score 0.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
MineralAnswers Payment solution is a single-platform answer for oil and gas companies to manage all things payments for their owners and vendors. This solution delivers payments across all major payment rails (check, ACH, Wire) for domestic and international payments.
$29
per month Track up to 3 Properties
Pricing
gINTMineralAnswers.com Payment Solution
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
PLUS
$29
per month Track up to 3 Properties
PRO
$59
per month Track up to 10 Properties
PREMIUM
$129
per month Track 10 or more Properties
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
gINTMineralAnswers.com Payment Solution
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
gINTMineralAnswers.com Payment Solution
Considered Both Products
gINT
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose gINT
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, …
MineralAnswers.com Payment Solution

No answer on this topic

User Ratings
gINTMineralAnswers.com Payment Solution
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
gINTMineralAnswers.com Payment Solution
Likelihood to Recommend
Suitable for all organisations that are required to collate, store and generate borehole site logs in a timely and orderly fashion. Can also be used for the storage of .ags data if setup correctly. Handles multiple projects well but is not without hiccups when used regularly. I believe it is possible to draw section views however have not done so myself.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Borehole logs
  • Storage of geotech data.
  • Customisable
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Bugs bugs bugs.
  • Confusing interface.
  • Split-logs cumbersome to generate.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, Holebase feels like a bespoke piece of software.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Central piece of software for collation and storage of all site data.
  • Storage and checker of ags data.
  • Professional looking logs.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots