GitKraken vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GitKraken
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
GitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.
$1,250
per installed license
Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Redgate's SQL Toolbelt Essentials includes industry-standard tools for SQL Server development & deployment, enabling users to include SQL Server databases in agile processes and enabilng developers to embed robust and scalable development practices.N/A
Pricing
GitKrakenRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Editions & Modules
Installed by You
$1250
per installed license
Hosted by GitKraken
Customized according to the amount of team members.
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GitKrakenRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GitKrakenRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Considered Both Products
GitKraken
Chose GitKraken
Updated technology and ease of use make GitKraken stand out against other products we've used in the past.
Chose GitKraken
I actually like Jira better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets.
Chose GitKraken
We are currently using all three listed above in conjunction with Axosoft. Both Jira and Axosoft are currently being used for the same purpose as we try and identify which product is better suited for us. We use GitHub and Slack in conjunction with Axosoft but not in the same …
Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Honestly, due to prior experience, we just have stuck with Redgate. Great tool and no reason to look anywhere else.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
I've used Visual Studio Database Projects for this type of work in the past with some success, but Redgate SQL Compare is faster, more transparent, and simply easier to use.
Faster is self explanatory.
More transparent, means that it's much easier to set up your desired options …
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
We did not consider other products before choosing Redgate.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Redgate SQL is better.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
I've been using Redgate SQL Compare for 15+ years and have no desire or need to look for anything to replace it.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
We only looked at Redgate SQL Compare if I recall correctly.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
I haven't felt the need to try many different products like Redgate.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
I was familiar with the quality of Redgate's products at the time of making the purchase decision. I checked out a trial version to make sure I could achieve what I wanted from the application, but I never made comparisons with other vendors tools on this occasion. …
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
We haven't compared SQL Compare with other tools in a VERY long time because they are honestly THE BEST.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Honestly, I have never been interested in the usable alternatives. I have always been good to use it. The license cost after all has always been sustainable. I never had the idea of \ u200b \ u200bchanging it nor the need to look at other software. Also (always a redgate …
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
We have used Symantecs Database Agents for Backup Exec and Veeam's Database Backup products. Symantec does not stack up well as compared to Redgate. Veeam is a considerable contender with their SQL Server Explorer. In some scenarios I would prefer to use VEEAM over Redgate, …
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Frankly, I came into a RedGate equipped database shop and never considered looking for anything else. I didn't find RedGate, it found me. When I leave one company, to go to a new company I immediately make sure there are licenses to Toolbelt Essentials. It's that important to …
Features
GitKrakenRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
GitKraken
9.9
Ratings
19% above category average
Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
-
Ratings
Branching and Merging10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Version History10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Pull Requests10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review Tools9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Access Control10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Branch Protection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GitKrakenRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.7 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GitKrakenRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GitKrakenRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Likelihood to Recommend
Axosoft is well suited as a project management tool for software teams looking to track workloads. Great tool for categorizing features, tasks, bugs, or a customized category into sprints. Companies can take advantage of the tracking aspects to create burndown charts or just to track employee time. I would say it is less appropriate for small task management like a to-do list type application because it has so many features that would go to waste. Furthermore, Axosoft is more geared towards development teams, but you could use it across departments if needed.
Read full review
We use SQL Compare to troubleshoot performance problems quite a bit since our data model is more like a template and not everything is 100% in sync and customization occurs between different client databases. We continually get pulled into performance issues and the developers will say Client A is performing different than Client B, why? Using SQL Compare, we usually find that one client was tuned and had indexes altered or added that weren't deployed to all clients or other objects weren't deployed correctly during the release. On the other hand, since our data model practices allow client databases to drift I tried to create a new golden image by trying to compare multiple databases based on the same data model and found it to be a very difficult process to complete using SQL Compare. SQL Compare gave me too much information and doesn't allow enough filtering to eliminate a lot of the noise.
Read full review
Pros
  • Creating pull request
  • Connection to various services
  • Git flow
Read full review
  • Simple and easy comparison of database schemas and data. Differences can be copied or synced from one database to another with a click of a button.
  • You can save "projects" so that you can easily rerun a previous comparison whenever you need to.
  • It has a very simple, easy to learn interface. I've never needed to read any documentation or watch any tutorials in order to figure out how to do something.
Read full review
Cons
  • A bit hard to use, or a steep learning curve. The UI isn't super intuitive at first, it took me awhile to pick it up and I had to get someone to basically show me what they recommend I set my filters and UI to.
  • This might be a case of improper setup but when making tickets, there isn't an auto response, so we get a lot of duplicate tickets if a conversation happens on the emails before someone takes the case and replies through OnTime.
Read full review
  • Pricing.... I wish there was an inexpensive developer version I could buy for myself.
  • Portability.... I would like to use it from a flash drive so I can use it where ever I am asked to work.
  • Unbundled.... This may be available already but I dont' recall I can buy it cheaply as a stand-alone product. Its only part of the bundle - cost effectively.
Read full review
Usability
Once you get the hang of Axosoft, I think it's easy to use however... getting the hang of it takes quite a bit of time. Additionally, once Axosoft makes an update, it can be difficult to find your bearings again. Like I said, once you know how to use the product, I think it's easy but it takes a bit to become comfortable and confident with Axosoft
Read full review
It's a good tool to have, but becomes expensive to buy a user license for each developer.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
They have a great community website where you can search for answers but are also very responsive when it comes to direct support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Updated technology and ease of use make GitKraken stand out against other products we've used in the past.
Read full review
I've used Visual Studio Database Projects for this type of work in the past with some success, but Redgate SQL Compare is faster, more transparent, and simply easier to use. Faster is self explanatory. More transparent, means that it's much easier to set up your desired options for schema change deployment scripts. Easier to use, It's really dead simple. Start a project, connect your source, connect destination, click compare.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Axosoft has positively affected the time management of our employee resources
  • Axosoft has shown us where we have inefficiencies in the organization
  • Axosoft has allowed us to track projects better, get them out on time allowing for more projects to be scheduled and, in turn, increased our subscriber count.
Read full review
  • Makes deployment fairly simple. Cutting our deployment time down.
  • With the SDK, we can customize our deployment process very quickly and easily.
  • History is not great, it does create scripts you can go back and see but it would be nice to have a quicker version view by object to save time.
Read full review
ScreenShots