GitLab vs. OpenText ALM/Quality Center

It is well-suited for any project that needs VCS. It's an excellent choice for teams that might be remote or have to collaborate across teams. Plenty of features allow for async working. With its dashboards and reporting features, it is also suitable for nontechnical PMs or stakeholders. It allows for very bespoke customization and can most often do much more than you need it to.

Incentivized

HP ALM is well suited for waterfall projects specifically if the teams are novice. It provides excellent support for project planning, tracking & test management. Top leadership can efficiently track, measure and report on project milestones & key performance indicators. Development teams have access to a wide variety of tools to automate their development, testing, bug tracking, and reporting tasks in one place. Its extensive documentation and tutorials help new users to learn this tool pretty fast. Though for agile teams HP ALM Octane can be explored but its not value for money & did not handle distributed teams well.

Incentivized

• GitLab excels in managing code versions, allowing easy tracking of changes, branch management, and merging contributions.
• It helps maintain code stability and reliability, saving time and effort in the development or research workflow.
• Powerful code review features, enabling collaboration and feedback among team members.
• Robust project management features, including issue tracking, kanban boards, and milestones.

Incentivized

• Release & Cycle Planning - Whether it is a new release or managing change requests, HP ALM can handle it all. In one click you can generate the status of a particular release from scoped requirements to test executed and everything in between. It also have KPI functionality which cane generate health indicators for each release to make go and no go indicators. The baseline features is a well thought out feature which is often neglected in many organization.
• Requirements Management - HP ALM provides all the features which are needed by robust requirements management professionals. Teams can easily create and update the requirements and provide the full visibility to the team downstream. The tractability and impact analysis feature is the greatest suite of HP ALM complemented with great reporting and graphs.
• Test Management - This is strongest module of HP ALM and provides the maximum values to team using HP ALM. Teams can perform manual, automated, performance and mobile testing with HP ALM. WIth HP UFT, teams can easily execute automated test case within ALM and report the results back. It also integrates with HP Mobile Center and test can be executed within HP ALM.
• Defect Management - Simple and Strong are the two words to describes HP ALM defect module capability. Team can use it out of the box or customize it using workflow scripts to accommodate any process flow a organization may have. Their tons of features within this module which helps in expediting your release cycle and help you market the release faster.
• Dashboard & Reports - HP has made numerous improvements to this module since I have known this product. You can generate any report or metrics if the data is present in ALM. Their are many after market solutions which can extend ALM data beyond the out of box reporting capabilities.

Incentivized

• CI variables management is sometimes hard to use, for example, with File type variables. The scope of each variable is also hard to guess.
• Access Token: there are too many types (Personal, Project, global..), and it is hard to identify the scope and where it comes from once created.
• Runners: auto-scaled runners are for the moment hard to put in place, and monitoring is not easy.

Incentivized

• Frequent search word/terms inside Quality Center can be prompted (Search Help).
• Dashboard - while exporting the report, pivot table (Pre defined) selection can be made available.
• Automated E-mail should be made available when ever a new defect is raised to relevant person/team.

Incentivized

I really feel the platform has matured quite faster than others, and it is always at the top of its game compared to the different vendors like GitHub, Azure pipelines, CircleCI, Travis, Jenkins. Since it provides, agents, CI/CD, repository hosting, Secrets management, user management, and Single Sign on; among other features

Incentivized

I like the ease to use and its reliable.

Incentivized

I find it easy to use, I haven't had to do the integration work, so that's why it is a 9/10, cause I can't speak to how easy that part was or the initial set up, but day to day use is great!

Incentivized

Because it lets me track the test cases with detailed scenarios and is clearly separated in folders. Also the defect filter helps me filter only the ones that have been assigned to a particular area of interest. The availability of reports lets me see the essentials fields which I might be missing the data on and helps me to work on these instead of having to go through everything.

Incentivized

I've never had experienced outages from GItlab itself, but regarding the code I have deployed to Gitlab, the history helps a lot to trace the cause of the issue or performing a rollback to go back to a working version

Incentivized

GItlab reponsiveness is amazing, has never left me IDLE. I've never had issues even with complex projects. I have not experienced any issues when integrating it with agents for example or SSO

Incentivized

At this point, I do not have much experience with Gitlab support as I have never had to engage them. They have documentation that is helpful, not quite as extensive as other documentation, but helpful nonetheless. They also seem to be relatively responsive on social media platforms (twitter) and really thrived when GitHub was acquired by Microsoft

Incentivized

It is a great tool, however, it got this rating because there is a lot of learning that takes a lot longer than other tools. There are no mobile versions of ALM even with just a project summary view. I believe ALM is well capable of integration with other analytics tools that can help business solutions prediction based on current and past project data. This is Data held in ALM but with no other use apart from human reading and project progress. ALM looks like a steady platform that I believe can handle more dynamic functionality. You could add an internal communication platform that is not a third party. Limit that communication tool to specific project members.

Incentivized

GitHub is an inferior product from most points of view. We had to use it and the teams finds no positives about it. Everything is a downgrade from our previous GitLab solution. GitLab CI\CD is vastly superior to workflows, for example doing a manual node is just "when : manual" in GitLab while you have to do clickops in GitHub to achieve the same. No overview of code in branches is a minus when we tried to figure out what our colleagues are trying to merge as it looked off.

Incentivized

We have various criteria as a part of the requirements in which we gathered from teams. We started evaluating each requirement across the tools, and we started providing score ranges from 1-10 and the Quality center holds top to that. Some of them are listed below: User Experience

The tool should be easy to use for testers, end-users, and administration

The tool should have available integrations to IDEs like Eclipse, Visual Studio and IntelliJ, which are used most commonly. Ability to execute tests from within the IDE

Available integrations to ALM tools (Jira) , where we are able to associate Requirements, Defects, Epics and User Stories with Test Cases. Ability to measure test effectiveness through these integrations

Availability of relevant documentation for users, administrators and managers.

Availability of on-line help for quick resolution to tester’s needs.

24x7 Vendor support for quick resolution to issues and to ensure maximum productivity

Availability of intuitive, easy-to-use interface for end-users

The tools should have the ability to import test cases from common tools like Excel and export test results into Excel and PDF

There is a low learning curve for end-users. The ability to quickly onboard technical and non-technical end-users quickly is great.

The tool should have powerful search capabilities and should provide the ability to search and filter based on test case information or attributes of the test cases.

The tool should provide the ability to search and replace text or field values and auto-replace content based on conditions.

Test Management

The tool should support Central management of test artifacts, and support for product structures for managing test artifacts.

The tool should be able to provide support for popular Testing Methodologies including Agile, Exploratory, TDD, Black box testing, Functional testing, etc., and should support Finastra’s shift-left philosophy.

The tool should support the ability to create and manage test cases and test steps.

The tool should be able to segregate manual and automated tests and should be able to measure effective automation at the product level. The tool should also provide the ability to link/associate manual tests to automated tests.

The tool should provide the ability to create test suites by associating test cases and have the ability to execute test suites as well as report on tests at the test script, test case, test suite, and product levels.

The tool should support Test Data - Defect Link and should be able to provide complete Traceability Coverage at product and release levels.

The tool should provide the ability to stop tests before complete execution. The tools should also have the ability to resume test execution from the point of last pause or failure.

The tool should provide the ability to capture screenshots of successful or failed tests for documentation purposes and to capture replication steps.

The tool should allow capturing and storing attachments at a test step or test step level.

The tool should support parameterization for different test data.

The tool should have versioning capability for test artifacts.

The tool should have the ability to integrate with Mobile testing tools and should help manage test cases related to the native apps, simulators, and emulators for mobile testing.

The tool should have the capability of creating manual template tests.

The tool should provide history changes for all available fields.

The tool should have the capability to save and view Favorites

The tool should provide a shortcut key functionality for features.

The tool should have the capability of scheduling the test suites to run.

The tool should provide the capability of the "Check Spelling" feature while writing tests. Reporting and validation The tool should support standard test reporting out-of-the-box. The tool should provide the capability of creating, saving, and reusing reports and dashboards for all users. The tool should provide the capability of sharing reports within user groups. The tool should provide the capability of exporting reports and report data to Excel and PDF. The tool should provide the capability of customizing, configuring, and modifying reports to suit product development team requirements. The Tool Should provide Dashboards, Widgets, and Reports which can be customizable for business teams to highlight scheduled tasks and provide insight into progress. The tool should provide Full Coverage and traceability Matrix reports. Administration and Usability Tool - Server installation should be available on Windows and Linux The tool should support Windows, Linux UI, and Mac for client interface. The tool should have support for Web interface and should have support for commonly used web browsers like IE, Edge, Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. The tool should have support for LDAP servers (AD) and should support single-sign-on capabilities. The tool should provide the ability to integrate with multiple LDAP servers simultaneously. The tool should have the ability to create users at the tool level (outside the LDAP domain) to support partners and 3rd party entities. The tool should have APIs for integrations and reporting. Preferably, the tool should support REST and SOAP APIs. The tool should provide authorization and authentication through user groups. The tool should enable an easy way to create, manage, delete, and deactivate users and user profiles as required. The tool should have the ability to move users across groups in a simple and intuitive manner. The tool should provide the ability to import and export users from Excel, LDAP, and through APIs. The tool should provide the ability to segregate roles and responsibilities at a tool level, project/product level, or a group/team level. The tool should support a distributed topology for implementation and installation. The tools should provide clustering capabilities, high availability architecture, and options for disaster recovery implementation. The licensing option for the tool should also support these capabilities. The tool should provide out-of-the-box capabilities for backup and recovery of data in a simple, initiative manner. The tool should have the ability to integrate to Jira, HP ALM, GIT, and other standard tools that are defined in Finastra. The Tool should provide the capability of configuring file change alerts and to whom to send the Email notifications. The Tool should provide the capability of configuring user notifications. Integration , Automation, and Operation The Test management tool should provide Rest API support for integration with the test automation framework. The Test management tool should support rest API integration with the test automation framework. It should support the following features: Automated Test suite creation, modification, and deletion Automated Test case creation, modification, and deletion Manual test case mapping with automated test scripts. API capability to do mapping externally It should support live reporting of automated test during execution It should support controlling test execution from external tools like Jenkins, VSTS etc. Capability to upload, modify and delete automated test reports The Test management tool should Feature to map automated test scripts with manual test cases and update test status and reports The Test management tool should Feature to create automated test suites and execution controller dashboard with live report capability. Capability to define test execution dependency. The Test management tool should report dash board for both manual, automation and test report history The Test management tool should be able to run Test execution on remote machine and parallel execution capability The Test management tool should have CI / CD support and integration with different tools like Jenkins, VSTS etc.. The Test management tool should have GIT integration The tool should have support for mobile testing. The tool will have the ability to integrate with Mobile testing tools like Appium, Mobile Center, Perfecto, etc. The tool should support native mobile application testing, simulation-based testing, and emulators-based testing to support shift-left.

Incentivized

I think is very well designed, and like any VCS it works as intended

Incentivized

• GitLab cut down our spent on container, package and infrastructure registry
• Best thing is we can now have everything in single platform which cost effective too
• Quality of support is really good and they do have emergency support team as well which is great

Incentivized

• By developing a single template for use across all divisions, common training, ease of reporting, and consistent use is gained by the enterprise. This meets many requirements imposed by regulators as well as reducing costs for support, integration and training.
• With consistency, we are able to develop regression tests and automate them efficiently. Having a regression suite ensures that code deployment does not break existing code. Once new capabilities are introduced into production, these functional tests can be added to the regression suite and automated for future use.
• As the environment grows, the need to support multiple testing applications is reduced. ALM is scalable. As the number of projects and users increases, adding additional database or application servers is easily managed.

Incentivized