GO-Global vs. OpenText Hybrid Workspaces

GO-Global

OpenText Hybrid Workspaces

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
GO-Global	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	GO-Global helps to reduce the cost and complexity of delivering Windows applications to users, wherever they are. GO-Global enables Windows ISVs to publish applications from any public, private, or hybrid cloud, to any device that supports a browser. GO-Global states that their service allows ISVs to deliver Windows applications at a lower cost than Microsoft RDS or VDI solutions from Citrix and VMware. Unlike products that wrap features around RDS, GO-Global provides full…	$4 per month per seat
Micro Focus Desktop Containers	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	Formerly Micro Focus Desktop Containers or Novell Application Virtualization, OpenText Hybrid Workspaces gives remote workers access to apps and data. They can leverage any device for secure access to applications and data whether remote or on-site.	N/A

Pricing

GO-Global

OpenText Hybrid Workspaces

Editions & Modules

GO-Global: $4
per month per seat
GO-Global: $4
per month per seat

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
GO-Global	Micro Focus Desktop Containers
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

All pricing is for concurrent seats. SSO is additional $0.50 per seat per month.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	GO-Global	OpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Considered Both Products	GO-Global No answer on this topic	Micro Focus Desktop Containers Kathleen Murray Application Analyst Chose Micro Focus Desktop Containers We went with Desktop Containers because we had a former colleague recommend it. However, we do feel we made the right choice for our organization. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

GO-Global

OpenText Hybrid Workspaces

Application Virtualization

Comparison of Application Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
	GO-Global - Ratings	OpenText Hybrid Workspaces 7.4 Ratings 3% below category average
Application support	00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Device support	00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Ease of deployment	00 Ratings	6.00 Ratings
Application packaging	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Security	00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	GO-Global	OpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Small Businesses	Parallels RAS Score 6.9 out of 10	Parallels RAS Score 6.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Nutanix AHV Score 9.0 out of 10	Nutanix AHV Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	Nutanix AHV Score 9.0 out of 10	Nutanix AHV Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	GO-Global	OpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	GO-Global	OpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	It is very well suited to large, diverse organizations looking to quickly deploy applications virtually to its employee base. They give immense control to system Admins and allow users to more easily install the applications they need. They also allow users quick access to their applications, even during migration. Incentivized Kathleen Murray Application Analyst Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	It allowed us to isolate applications so that they did not adversely interact with other applications. They served as a virtual machine while we managed the migration to a new OS. They helped us decrease malicious attacks because web browsers operating within a container could be terminated if an attack occurred. They allowed us to quickly deploy applications across a diverse, global organization. Incentivized Kathleen Murray Application Analyst Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Container access and restrictions were a bit cumbersome to set up. We would frequently have users report containers failing to work properly due to file size. There was very little documentation we could provide to users during onboarding Incentivized Kathleen Murray Application Analyst Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	We went with Desktop Containers because we had a former colleague recommend it. However, we do feel we made the right choice for our organization. Incentivized Kathleen Murray Application Analyst Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	We were able to migrate to a different OS 50% more quickly than in the past. We saw a dramatic decrease in malicious attacks while using this product. Our users were able to more quickly get access to the products they needed. We no longer needed to worry about applications not playing nice with others since they were isolated Incentivized Kathleen Murray Application Analyst Read full review
ScreenShots