GoodRx for Healthcare Professionals vs. PitchBook

GoodRx is a great tool if you don't have insurance or your medications aren't covered. It offers deals on many, many different prescriptions and can help people save a significant amount of money without a lot of labor. Anyone who has computer/printer or phone/app access can utilize its features, so it's very accessible to the majority of people.

Incentivized

For our business being able to segregate and prioritise data is essential in keeping overall costs down. Rather than targeted thousands of accounts we need to be able to reduce this number or at least manage which are prioritised first. Whilst it is not the only data vendor we use it is an important one in filling gaps that others do not seem to have reliable information for. It is not the best tool for mapping in revenue or employee size, which is not essential for us as we have other data vendor contracts that have this information.

Incentivized

• Convenient. Very easy to access and use.
• Efficient. The interface is very user-friendly and easy to understand.
• Saves money. It definitely does what it sets out to do - save people money!

Incentivized

• PitchBook provides a very comprehensive database of not just companies and investors but also M&A activity, financials, funds and LPs.
• Pitchbook is multi-dimensional it how it can be used. For example, it can help to accomplish various business objectives, including deal sourcing, due diligence, private market intelligence and fundraising.
• PitchBook has an easy-to-navigate user interface. It enables the user to quickly find the data and information that he or she needs.

Incentivized

• Knowing that many people, on some of these medicines, are elderly and would appreciate saving a couple of dollars, it would be nice to have a way to use GoodRX without a computer or phone.
• Submit/request button. If someone's medicine isn't included in the program, it may be helpful to have a way to monitor demand.
• A tool to help you measure how much you save each year would be neat to see.

Incentivized

• more accurate information about valuation
• If you can get PPS that would be amazing for further analysis
• Send me alerts
• I have had to change my profile quite frequently as it is in accurate so I imagine that is the case for others

Incentivized

I personally love the organization structure of PitchBook. I think others like the UI of Crunchbase but I am not a fan of CB. It is too flashy. PitchBook gives you eveyrhign you need and makes it black and white. No need to flash up the data.

Incentivized

The overall support for PitchBook is about average. It is not excellent for two primary reasons. First, PitchBook can run slow from time to time, and I cannot copy and paste from the Chrome extension. I have found neither of those issues to be a function of the computer I am using. However, the PitchBook support team has proved helpful on several occasions.

Incentivized

I haven't ever heard of competitors of GoodRx, and I've never had a reason to look anywhere else. I've always had a good experience with GoodRx, no issues or questions from the pharmacies at all! Very convenient and it's nice to have a quick way to save a bit of money.

Incentivized

Certain regards, such as comprehensiveness and ability to store and export searches and data related to searches PitchBook performs better than the above and remains our go to tool. However we also use DealRoom to supplement some of that data to ensure comprehensiveness and accuracy. Crunchbase appears less sophisticated and hence less relevant for us

Incentivized

• Saves our employees money.
• Boosts morale - it's nice that employees can talk about saving money together.

Incentivized

• I'll pull ~25 company descriptions on occassion instead of writing them myself. Each time I grab one of those I'm saving myself 2-3 minutes. Easily save an hour+ on this simple / repetitive task related to a daily / weekly work product.
• If I want to understand other companies in the industry, PB's search function will save me from skimming the internet for hours. This can result in 4-7 hours of time savings across a more macro or industry-wide project.
• Quickly finding who invested in an asset can save sometimes 30-45 minutes of searching the internet. While I wish it provided more details on the specific fund that invested (i.e., Fund IV), it provides sufficient direction for me to begin searching internal databases.

Incentivized