Goodworld vs. Pachama

Pachama

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Goodworld	Score 9.0 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	Goodworld is a social impact platform for companies and nonprofits. Users can launch, manage, and measure CSR and ESG programs with tools for purpose-driven business. The Goodworld social impact platform engages employees and customers with the causes they care about. Through donations, volunteering and impact rewards, people can take action on social justice, climate change, education, mental health and other important issues in support of over 1.7 million…	$0 per month 2.8% platform fee + donor tips
Pachama	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Pachama is a corporate social responsibility platform growing the Forest Carbon Credits market. Pachama helps scale up the protection and restoration of the forests of the planet, which are "the holders of the planet’s biodiversity, keystones for maintaining planetary homeostasis."	N/A

Pricing

Goodworld

Pachama

Editions & Modules

Free for Nonprofits: $0
per month 2.8% platform fee + donor tips
Launch: $99
per month
Boost: $299
per month
Scale: $449
per month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Goodworld	Pachama
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

Prices vary by project and credits are per Tonne of CO₂. "A carbon credit is a financing tool to support projects reducing greenhouse gas emissions or recapturing carbon from the atmosphere. A single carbon credit is equal to one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent gases. Carbon credits were formalized by the United Nations Kyoto Protocol. That UN body also developed the key principles and rules guiding verified credits today. In the past, there have been a range of activities that could issue carbon credits. Many experts believe that carbon markets previously were flooded with unverified credits that did not represent real carbon reduction. Our team at Pachama wants to change that. We work only with projects that have third-party verification and pass our own standards."

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Goodworld	Pachama
Considered Both Products	Goodworld Denise Durkee Director, West Michigan Chose Goodworld We are a development team of about 8 people, located in different areas. We liked Goodworld because it was easy to use for all of us, each being in charge of our own event, but using the same information. It has a dashboard that will show overall numbers and statistics. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Goodworld Goodworld was the most user-friendly and streamlined platform with all the fundraising tools we were looking for PLUS CSR capabilities. The landing pages and campaigns integrated seamlessly with our website and have made it easier than ever to empower our Board, Corporate … Incentivized Helpful? Lacey White, MPA, CFRE Senior Director, Corporate Engagement Chose Goodworld Goodworld is by far the more superior product because it lets us be more proactive in implementing customized giving experiences, has a more powerful dashboard, and streamlines the giving process in a more modern interface. That's just the technology aspect - their team makes … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Goodworld When the pandemic hit, and we needed to move our annual fundraiser from in-person to online, our donor CRM at the time didn't offer the ability to easily create an aesthetically pleasing online campaign without additional HTML and design knowledge. We saw another organization … Incentivized Helpful? KG Kitty Gordillo Executive Director Chose Goodworld The biggest incentive for using Goodworld as opposed to other platforms is truly ease of use and branding ability. While the other platforms may have extra bells and whistles on the database management compared to Goodworld's current setup, These other programs make it … Incentivized Helpful? DL Danica Laios Development Manager Chose Goodworld Much better, we hated our last CRM network it was antiquated and impossible to get ahold of anyone. Incentivized Helpful? SP Susan Patterson Executive Director Chose Goodworld We were not pleased with the customer support and ease of setting up events with Click and Pledge. Our donors are often called to make donations over the phone rather than use the C&P platform. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Goodworld Givelively had less functionality, and Mobile Cause seemed harder to navigate and more expensive but both seem fine Incentivized Helpful?	Pachama No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Goodworld	Pachama
Small Businesses	Submittable Score 8.8 out of 10	Submittable Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Submittable Score 8.8 out of 10	Submittable Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Goodworld	Pachama
Likelihood to Recommend	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Goodworld	Pachama
Likelihood to Recommend	I'd recommend the Goodworld platform for almost any scenario of online giving. It's definitely well suited for smaller grassroots organizations as it isn't cost-prohibitive, and helps get you up and running to process donations quickly. Their customer service has been great with fast response times and helping me get things sorted out quickly so there is not downtime for our front-end users. I'd say the only real challenge we experienced to date is regarding in-person events that need a point of purchase/donation swiper. For live events we still need to work out the particulars and I expect Goodworld will come up with a few options soon. KG Kitty Gordillo Executive Director Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Easy to customize and design campaigns that fit our branding. Easy to integrate onto our website without having to call developers. Able to share via social media in a streamlined fashion. Incentivized DL Danica Laios Development Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	I don’t really have any dislikes. The only time I have trouble with something is creating the appropriate graphics that work across all devices, especially mobile devices. It can be a bit cumbersome. WA Whitney Atteberry Community Engagement Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew	It's the best deal on the best suite of tools. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	We are a development team of about 8 people, located in different areas. We liked Goodworld because it was easy to use for all of us, each being in charge of our own event, but using the same information. It has a dashboard that will show overall numbers and statistics. Incentivized Denise Durkee Director, West Michigan Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Through partnering with Goodworld we have been able to steward nearly $2.4 million to nonprofit organizations nationwide in the past 18 months We have leveraged the Goodworld platform to significantly improve our response time to partner requests and social issues or natural disasters like giving to support Ukraine The platform allows us to overlay strategy with technology for greater community impact with at least 45 companies every year Incentivized Lacey White, MPA, CFRE Senior Director, Corporate Engagement Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	Goodworld Screenshots