TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google App Engine vs. IBM Cloud Foundry

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google App Engine

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AGoogle App Engine is Google Cloud's platform-as-a-service offering. It features pay-per-use pricing and support for a broad array of programming languages.

    $0.05

    Per Hour Per Instance

    IBM Cloud Foundry

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cloud Foundry is an IBM version of the open-source platform designed for building, testing, deploying, and scaling applications. Enterprises can run Cloud Foundry in a public isolated environment, while natively integrating with other IBM Cloud services, such as AI, Blockchain, and IoT.

    $0.07

    Per GBH

    Pricing
    Google App EngineIBM Cloud Foundry
    Editions & Modules
    Starting Price
    $0.05
    Per Hour Per Instance
    Max Price
    $0.30
    Per Hour Per Instance
    Community Runtimes
    $0.07
    Per GBH
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google App EngineIBM Cloud Foundry
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google App EngineIBM Cloud Foundry
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    Chose Google App Engine
    Azure App Service is in par with Google App Engine although you may want to use Azure App Service if you are integrating with other Microsoft IT components, for example SQL Server. Google App Engine is great when in long run, you will be using Google cloud components, for …
    Incentivized
    IBM
    Chose IBM Cloud Foundry
    IBM Cloud Foundry is among the services provided by our cloud provider. This is why we choose to go with Cloud Foundry.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Google App EngineIBM Cloud Foundry
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Google App Engine and IBM Cloud Foundry
    Feature
    Google App Engine
    8.7
    31 Ratings
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    7.6
    24 Ratings
    Ease of building user interfaces9.017 Ratings7.010 Ratings
    Scalability9.031 Ratings8.524 Ratings
    Platform management overhead9.031 Ratings8.512 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability9.023 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Platform access control9.030 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration8.027 Ratings7.523 Ratings
    Development environment creation9.028 Ratings7.722 Ratings
    Development environment replication8.027 Ratings6.49 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification9.027 Ratings4.711 Ratings
    Issue recovery9.025 Ratings7.520 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes8.028 Ratings7.522 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Google App EngineIBM Cloud Foundry
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (35 ratings)
    8.5
    (32 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.3
    (8 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.4
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)