Google ARCore vs. Variant Launch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ARCore
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Google's ARCore is an augmented reality development SDK.N/A
Variant Launch
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
WebXR on iOS and Android - without installing an app. Used to create AR experience in-browser from any link or QR code with a Javascript SDK. Native-quality tracking in WebAR with no cost per-view. WebXR Compatible No WebXR support on iOS? With Launch, the user can build browser-based WebXR experiences that work on iOS devices. No cost per-view To avoid project stoppage due to sticker-shock from pricing, Variant Launch is…
$0
per month per project
Pricing
Google ARCoreVariant Launch
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Developer
$0
per month per project
Basic
$299
per month per project
Pro
$599
per month per project
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ARCoreVariant Launch
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAnnual plans are available with 2 months free.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google ARCoreVariant Launch
Considered Both Products
ARCore
Chose ARCore
Vuforia engine has limited functionalities compared to ARCore. It has image-based detection and augmentation which requires users to have the anchor image with them for the augmentation to properly occur. ARCore solves that and it's one step less to reach the user and really …
Chose ARCore
We want object detection and rendering of 3D models. Many SDK do this task but Google ARCore is Google's own product and it has many nice features too.
Chose ARCore
Though Google ARCore has fewer results in github repository as compared to ARKit, it still has a more stable platform and better documentation to make the development process easy. One can do experiments very quick and easy with ARCore to try out various features. Amazon …
Variant Launch

No answer on this topic

User Ratings
Google ARCoreVariant Launch
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google ARCoreVariant Launch
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for small objects in home/office or familiar surroundings to anchor Augmented Reality Objects. It works well for most e-commerce use cases, travel use cases, games, etc. It is not well suited where depth occlusion is the primary use case or human body anchoring is required or even for large-scale AR use cases.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • It understands the surroundings very well as it maps it around the user.
  • It understands the users' relative position in terms of the surroundings and tracks the users' movements.
  • It can sense the surrounding lighting and overlay that on top of the AR objects to make it more immersive.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Depth sensing can be improved
  • Human body detection is not great
  • For large scale virtual objects, it slows down
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Vuforia Engine has limited functionalities compared to ARCore. It has image-based detection and augmentation which requires users to have the anchor image with them for the augmentation to properly occur. ARCore solves that and it's one step less to reach the user and really convince them to try it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It helps to make your 3D app more realistic
  • It's better than other tools for rendering on app smoothness
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots