Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Authenticator | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Google Authenticator is a mobile authentication app. | N/A |
WatchGuard AuthPoint | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | AuthPoint Total Identity Security provides businesses with a solution to protect user accounts and credentials. With multi-factor authentication and dark web credential monitoring, AuthPoint mitigates the risks associated with workforce credential attacks. AuthPoint adds an extra layer of security by monitoring for potential credential exposure in the dark web for both personal and corporate accounts. | N/A |
| Google Authenticator | WatchGuard AuthPoint | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Authenticator | WatchGuard AuthPoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Verified User Chose Google Authenticator I also have to utilize WatchGuard AuthPoint, as it's a proprietary MFA - so I'm stuck with it. Google Authenticator looks nicer, cleaner and doesn't require me to have individual apps for each service I need to access. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Google Authenticator There are a few things to keep in mind when using Google Authenticator. Second, it's imperative that everything be kept as simple as possible. Many customers don't understand why they're putting up MFA, therefore adding further difficulty to their daily routines is always a … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Computer Technician in Information Technology at Sound Advice (Computer Networking, 11-50 employees) Chose Google Authenticator Being under the google umbrella gives a level of reassurance to our users. It seems to be cleaner and easier to use for our users. Being able to use a product from an already known vendor helps onboard new users to the software. It is clean and easy to use, all of the users … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Google Authenticator First, Google Authenticator meets the security requirements which should be considered "table stakes". Second, simplicity is critical. Many users don' understand why they are setting up MFA (or they just don't care), and so adding additional complications to their day-to-day is … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | ![]() Senior Network Engineer in Information Technology at Invision Technologies, LLC (Telecommunications, 51-200 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint AuthPoint is a good merge between Authy and Google Authenticator. Authy has a better push notification system while google auth has a better time based. AuthPoint is a perfect mix between the two, and if you need both, it is the obvious solution. Having integration … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Computer and Information Systems Manager in Information Technology at Busch Systems (Renewables & Environment, 51-200 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint We use the Microsoft MFA also and I have used the Google Authenticator (only prior to the MS version being released, however). They are similar in terms of functionality of course, but I have not attempted additional integrations using SAML 2.0 or anything like that so cannot … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Infrastructure Engineer in Information Technology at CommPutercations, Inc. (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint I've used Duo, Authy and Google Authenticator for non-work-related accounts. I didn't have any say in initially choosing AuthPoint for our organization and haven't had any big enough reason to recommend we switch away. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() external sales in Sales at Office-IT (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint Google Authenticator has fewer features then WatchGuard AuthPoint, therefore I have not used the Google Authenticator solution a lot. But of course Google Authenticator is free so it is a good way to improve security cheaply but if you want to have a professional solution with … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint The ease of use AuthPoint offers is nearly unmatched, with all of the same (if not more!) security benefits. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint Due to the recognition and functionalities that Watchguard has in the market worldwide, it makes me feel safe when purchasing its products. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Project Manager in Information Technology at MSP (Building Materials, 501-1000 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint WatchGuard is easily managed and has different features like DHCP within it, which can be managed easily Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint WatchGuard offers similar performance to other authenticators but allows greater customization of the service and integrates with cybersecurity systems Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint Watchguard Authpoint provides central management for us and all of our customers. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint WatchGuard AuthPoint is easy to manage and implement. It works really well with WatchGuard solutions. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Junior Engineer in Information Technology at CECOM, S.A.S (Computer & Network Security, 11-50 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint AuthPoint has a simpler and more intuitive configuration, added to the cloud administration that it provides us, without a doubt it is a point in its favor. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint FortiAuthenticator is OTP based only or 2FA. Whereas, WatchGuard AuthPoint has the flexibility of choosing OTP, QR, password, or Push notification. Fortitoken licenses are affixed to a single FortiGate unit and can only be used for FortiGate services only. Whereas WatchGuard … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Senior Network Engineer in Information Technology at Pioneer-360 (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint WatchGuard's AuthPoint has been a breeze to implement and manage as compared to other vendor solutions and its third-party integrations put it in on a level beyond comparison. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() I.S. Specialist in Information Technology at X-Ray Associates of New Mexico (Medical Practice, 201-500 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint We chose WatchGuard for two reasons. 1. We have been using WatchGuard appliances for many years and 2. The AuthPoint licensing prices are reasonable and fit our budget. So I would say that familiarity with WatchGuard products and knowing how good Watchguard support is were … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Network Engineer in Information Technology at OGL Computer (Information Technology & Services, 201-500 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint WatchGuard AuthPoint in my experience has been far easier to setup compared to Duo which I have used extensively in the past, for both engineers and the end users Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Project Engineer in Information Technology at Computer St Louis (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint Authpoint was an easy choice as we use WatchGuard firewalls. This allows us to set up two factor authentication for VPN access easily. With Work-From-Home becoming the norm [rather] than the exception, this extra layer of security is vital. It is nice that there are several … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() VP in Information Technology at RYMARK (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint I've found most MFA applications function essentially the same. It's ideal to have all your accounts using the same platform for simplicity. WG's AuthPoint provides that compatibility. We're a WatchGuard Gold Partner and have been installing WG firewalls and Wireless Access … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() CEO in Information Technology at Calvert Technologies (Computer & Network Security, 11-50 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint AuthPoint protects both cloud/app logins as well as, and most importantly, our corporate login (Active Directory based). WatchGuard AuthPoint gives the option of using hardware OTP tokens for corporate network login, as well as the mobile app which is simple to use, customise, … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint We have used AuthLite. WatchGuard has more options but I found it easier to use, easier to teach users how to use but cost is significantly more Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint AuthPoint has a much broader use, where the competition falls short. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Network System Administrator in Information Technology at IPM (Hospital & Health Care, 51-200 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint WatchGuard AuthPoint is up there with the best of them like Duo. Since we use WG Fireboxes we decided to go with AuthPoint. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint It is better suited for smaller/medium sized businesses which is a large number that we support. We also like the push notification instead of having to read through lots of codes. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint WatchGuard has great documentation, and we use it in our product stack of firewalls which is why we thought it'd be a good compliment to use it for MFA. It was easy to use and setup with good documentation and support. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Senior Client Relations Manager in Sales at Boffins (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint WatchGuard was selected unanimously by our senior engineers and Technical Director. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Systems Administrator in Customer Service at ProMission Projects, Inc. (Information Technology & Services, 1-10 employees) Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint Honestly, other than free options and considering our investment in the WatchGuard product sphere, we were drawn to AuthPoint because of its integration with our existing WatchGuard tools. It's simple to manage and cost-effective, so we haven't had a reason to consider any … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Google Authenticator | WatchGuard AuthPoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 (46 ratings) | 8.7 (220 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 (1 ratings) | 8.5 (20 ratings) |
| Usability | 8.0 (2 ratings) | 7.1 (27 ratings) |
| Availability | 10.0 (1 ratings) | 9.1 (4 ratings) |
| Performance | 10.0 (1 ratings) | 9.1 (4 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 8.6 (8 ratings) | 7.0 (52 ratings) |
| In-Person Training | - (0 ratings) | 6.4 (1 ratings) |
| Online Training | - (0 ratings) | 8.7 (2 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 (1 ratings) | 7.5 (13 ratings) |
| Configurability | 4.0 (1 ratings) | 7.3 (3 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | 8.0 (1 ratings) | 8.2 (3 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | 5.0 (1 ratings) | 9.1 (4 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | 8.0 (1 ratings) | 9.1 (4 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | 8.0 (1 ratings) | 9.1 (4 ratings) |