Google Cloud Datastore vs. Scylla

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Datastore
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Datastore is a NoSQL "schemaless" database as a service, supporting diverse data types. The database is managed; Google manages sharding and replication and prices according to storage and activity.N/A
Scylla
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
ScyllaDB headquartered in Palo Alto offers Scylla, a NoSQL database alternative to Apache Cassandra available in Enterprise and Cloud DBaaS editions.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Considered Both Products
Google Cloud Datastore
Chose Google Cloud Datastore
We selected Google Cloud Datastore as one of our candidates for our NoSQL data is because it is provided by Google Cloud, which fits our needs. Most of our infrastructure is on Google Cloud, so when we think about the NoSQL database, the first thing we thought about is Google …
Chose Google Cloud Datastore
If deploying an application in Google Cloud Platform, using Google Cloud Datastore is a no brainer because of the simplicity of setup. Other options would require more setup and configuration, and do not come with the same level of guaranteed uptime as Google Cloud Datastore. …
Scylla
Chose Scylla
Scylla has a quick learning curve (same as Cassandra) compared to other proprietary solutions like BigTable. It supports higher throughput and lower latency that other NoSQL databases like MongoDB, which sacrifice those features for more flexibility and unique features.
Features
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Datastore
10.0
Ratings
12% above category average
Scylla
8.4
Ratings
5% below category average
Performance10.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Availability10.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Concurrency10.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Security10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility10.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud DatastoreScylla
Likelihood to Recommend
Using Google Cloud Datastore in conjunction with Google AppEngine was a very seamless integration and much easier than using other datastores since so much of the configuration is abstracted for you. Because of this, creating simple applications is very easy and getting Google Cloud Datastore to power the backend ties everything together. If we were using Google Compute Engine, I'd imagine the same seamless experience would be there as well.
Read full review
Scylla is well suited for high-throughput scenarios where keyed data must be read or written with consistently low latency. It's less appropriate for use cases requiring relational queries, secondary indexes, or more structured data sets.
Read full review
Pros
  • It is hosted in GCP, our primary cloud provider.
  • It integrates with all the services we use in GCP.
Read full review
  • Low-latency reads
  • CQL has a familiar syntax
  • Parity with Cassandra
  • Practical features
Read full review
Cons
  • Part of the Google Cloud Platform walled garden.
  • Pay for read/writes to the datastore, in addition to storage.
  • Not many libraries exist.
Read full review
  • Better documentation for best practices (e.g., how to effectively use connection pooling)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I give Google Cloud a full score because it satisfies our needs so well. We host most of our infrastructure on Google Cloud and using Google Cloud Datastore helps us to solve our NoSQL storage problem. and Google Cloud Datastore is so scalable and elastic. It saves us lots of time to maintain and saves us money.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
Very easy-to-understand syntax--uses CQL (same as Cassandra), which has many similarities to standard SQL. There are some gotchas, however, that must be known during schema development.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The Scylla cloud support team is incredibly responsive and proactive.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We selected Google Cloud Datastore as one of our candidates for our NoSQL data is because it is provided by Google Cloud, which fits our needs. Most of our infrastructure is on Google Cloud, so when we think about the NoSQL database, the first thing we thought about is Google Cloud Datastore. And it proves itself.
Read full review
Scylla has a quick learning curve (same as Cassandra) compared to other proprietary solutions like BigTable. It supports higher throughput and lower latency that other NoSQL databases like MongoDB, which sacrifice those features for more flexibility and unique features.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Simple billing part of Google Cloud Platform
  • No time spent configuring and maintaining Google Cloud Datastore.
  • Very good uptime for our applications.
Read full review
  • Addresses latency requirements of our platform
Read full review
ScreenShots