Google Cloud Identity vs. JumpCloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Identity
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Identity is a unified identity, access, app, and endpoint management (IAM/EMM) platform that gives users access to apps with single sign-on, provides multi-factor authentication to protect users and company data, and enforces policies for personal and corporate devices and endpoints.N/A
JumpCloud
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
JumpCloud® delivers a unified open directory platform used to securely manage identities, devices, and access across an organization. With JumpCloud, IT teams and MSPs enable users to work securely from anywhere and manage their Windows, Apple, Linux, and Android devices from a single platform.
$11
per month per user
Pricing
Google Cloud IdentityJumpCloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Device Management
$11
per month per user
SSO
$13
per month per user
Device Management + Identity
$15
per month per user
Core Directory
$15
per month per user
JumpCloud Platform
$22
per month per user
JumpCloud Platform Prime
$27
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud IdentityJumpCloud
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details18% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud IdentityJumpCloud
Considered Both Products
Google Cloud Identity
Chose Google Cloud Identity
We adopted Google Cloud Identity as an additional feature because it allowed us to integrate with it using multi-factor authentication. The IBM Cloud platform remains valid, and we have no plans to discontinue its use for identity management. From the user's perspective, we …
JumpCloud
Chose JumpCloud
The Okta Identity Cloud and OneLogin
Chose JumpCloud
JumpCloud had better pricing, and since we currently need it for single sign-on only, we chose it.
Features
Google Cloud IdentityJumpCloud
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Identity
-
Ratings
JumpCloud
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
ID-Management Access Control00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Password Management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
ID Risk Management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud IdentityJumpCloud
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud IdentityJumpCloud
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud IdentityJumpCloud
Likelihood to Recommend
For example, if the system you are building is a general application service that does not primarily focus on ID management, it would be wise to use a service like Google's rather than developing your own IDaaS. While there may be cases where an IDaaS other than Google's is acceptable, Google is likely one of the best solutions when considering user recognition and ease of use. On the other hand, Gmail addresses are commonly used for other purposes, and users may not pay much attention to password management, so you should avoid using them for systems that require security. To strengthen security, you should consider making multi-factor authentication mandatory, etc.
Read full review
JumpCloud is least suited in situations where you have few devices, but lots of users. JumpCloud heavily focuses on the "One-User-One-Device" type of use, and does lack some of the features things like Active Directory is better suited for when having multiple users accessing one machine. Their Powershell APIs are fantastic and getting only more powerful. Lots of features are hidden behind these APIs, so admins not as familiar with Powershell would have more issues leveraging these tools. BYOD deployments are amazing, especially for macOS devices that are using Apple Business Manager and can leverage Zero Touch deployments. It is especially good at handling mixed systems, whereas other options, such as Jamf, are really suiting only for macOS, or Intune is more suited for Windows; JumpCloud managed to handle both systems well.
Read full review
Pros
  • Two-factor authentication available.
  • The Google authentication method is familiar to many users.
  • It is expected that it will also support authentication methods that will become common in the future.
Read full review
  • User Management - The ability to control our users and set password/polices is made easy in the JC console
  • Device Management - Using JC each user is assigned to their own device with only the rights to do their job - When elevated rights are required, this is done simply via the JC console for the period of time required
  • SSO - Using JC's SAML SSO integrations we are building out our SSO offering and this is making for a much simpler daily user experience
Read full review
Cons
  • This time, I investigated it in advance, and it worked as expected, so I don't have any specific ideas for improvement.
  • Additionally, if we were using another IDAAS, it would have been beneficial to have knowledge on how to integrate it with Google tools, along with some relevant case studies.
Read full review
  • SSO via OpenID - Opening up their SSO from just SAML to including OpenID (OAuth) would allow us to make more use of the service and to also incorporate it into some internal testing suites
  • Time Limited User Elevation - The ability to time limit a users elevation of privileges would be a great addition
  • Extending device management to include LPA - Least Privilege Access is becoming a bigger ask from our external auditors - Being able to do this via JC would be amazing
Read full review
Usability
I chose Google because I thought it would be the best fit, but I didn't fully consider other cloud platforms (Azure, AWS, etc.), so I rated it 8. We assume that current Japanese users are familiar with Google, because we feel that there are far more people with Google email addresses than those with IDs on other cloud services.
Read full review
It's simple. I like how JumpCloud keeps things simple. Similar to Apple's ecosystem, they give you what you want with some extra features and bells and whistles but it doesn't take a large instruction manual to use it. They have the support system and KB articles to back up their product and learn about a feature and how to implement it
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We have their premium support. Not only is the support great, but our SAM / Account manager directs any questions or updates to the proper channels and gets us the needed info and solution quickly. Due to this, we find JumpCloud to exceed our expectations and puts us at ease that our Foundation Tech Solution is VERY reliable.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Being responsible for choosing the product after a POC and pilot we found the process to be simple and effective
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We adopted Google Cloud Identity as an additional feature because it allowed us to integrate with it using multi-factor authentication. The IBM Cloud platform remains valid, and we have no plans to discontinue its use for identity management. From the user's perspective, we simply added more authentication options. This also ensures we are prepared for future use when multi-factor authentication becomes available for user apps on the IBM Cloud.
Read full review
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • From a business perspective, there were two steps.
  • First, we switched from our in-house ID management system to a cloud service. This allowed us to focus our development resources on application development.
  • At the same time, we were able to localize the handling of personal information, which resulted in increased efficiency in management aspects, including handling external inquiries, and in the development of encryption.
  • The second step was adding Google Cloud Identity as an option.
  • This allows more users to easily use our services. It can be said that this has improved user convenience.
  • I expect Google to accommodate future changes in authentication requirements, such as biometric authentication.
Read full review
  • Very easily add, or disable employee logins
  • Reduce "password fatigue" by being able to reduce password expiration requirements, and having single sign on
  • Higher security and visibility of security issues
  • Reduced onboarding time from days to minutes
  • Enabled easy reassignment of user accounts to another user via groups when employees leave
  • Quick securing of terminated users, or otherwise compromised accounts
  • Reduced user disablement time from previous manual methods requiring days, to literal minutes
Read full review
ScreenShots