Google Cloud Key Management vs. HashiCorp Vault

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Key Management
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Key Management allows users to manage encryption keys on Google Cloud.N/A
HashiCorp Vault
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
HashiCorp offers Vault, an encryption tool of use in the management of secrets including credentials, passwords and other secrets, providing access control, audit trail, and support for multiple authentication methods. It is available open source, or under an enterprise license.
$0.03
Pricing
Google Cloud Key ManagementHashiCorp Vault
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Cloud - HCP Vault
$0.03/hr
Open Source
Free
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud Key ManagementHashiCorp Vault
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud Key ManagementHashiCorp Vault
Considered Both Products
Google Cloud Key Management
Chose Google Cloud Key Management
The UI / UX, first of all, is night and day difference. The main attraction after the services were this: It's user friendly. It welcomes new users and properly guides them on what to do and what you can expect. Honestly, I had a very bad experience with Microsoft Azure in …
HashiCorp Vault
Chose HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp Vault integrates with a lot of tools and systems, and the documentation was pretty robust with a lot of community help. Because HashiCorp Vault is also older than other solutions, it is already well developed with a lot of features you need for storing secrets and …
Chose HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp Vault is way better than azure key vault; it has more features and it goes beyond a key-value secret store.
Chose HashiCorp Vault
We evaluated Symantec as an existing partner within our enterprise. We found that the API provided by Vault is superior and that was a critical use case in our organization. We also found that Vault has more engine types which allow different types of data to be stored. This …
Chose HashiCorp Vault
I already used Encrypted Hiera (which is basically YAML files encrypted with a private key scheme where this key is stored in plain text on the server, which is obviously not the best option). Another solution I also used for this purpose was AWS KMS, but with Vault I don't get …
Chose HashiCorp Vault
As mentioned before, HashiCorp Vault really is the best in its class. Having used other secrets management tools, HashiCorp has really made Vault the easiest to use in a cross-compatibility function, in a multi-cloud/hybrid environment, and in multiple fashions. Many other …
User Ratings
Google Cloud Key ManagementHashiCorp Vault
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud Key ManagementHashiCorp Vault
Likelihood to Recommend
Use for most types of cloud SQL services. Excellent modern-day encryption technologies. If a customer wants to manage their keys then Google Cloud Platform is well suited for those people if it matters. Able to divide workloads and pipelines. Customer managed encryption keys support for Data fusion, Data Proc, Cloud SQL, and GKE. We use Cloud EKM: key use operations $0.03 per 10,000 operations for our day to day operations.
Read full review
Vault is a reliable and resilient as the Key Management System. It is not for the novice user that does not have a background in information security. It requires a significant time investment into the different key engines that the solution offers to get started. It works very well once implemented and is very flexible in general.
Read full review
Pros
  • Option for Customer-Managed Encryption keys for Cloud which very [few] providers do.
  • Option to enhance security via Hardware Security Modules.
  • Easy control panel and CLI.
  • Unified commands to approve or deny key requests.
Read full review
  • The HTTP API you use to write and read secrets is open and can be used by any application.
  • It keeps our sensitive data/credentials out of our GitLab repositories.
  • Sealing and unsealing the Vault on demand adds an additional layer of security.
Read full review
Cons
  • They removed the option for RSA128 bit security so yeah if it matters it a bummer.
  • Pipelines are limited and very [few] for the amount you pay.
  • General usability and Rapid CI/CD.
Read full review
  • Documentation for the API moves slower than changes in the API itself
  • The database secret engine's API design isn't as elegant as it could be
  • No support for revocation of all secrets under one path
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
HashiCorp Vault is the best there is out there, and it has become critical to our secret management use cases. It would be difficult to find anything that would suit our needs better and that would be beneficial for us to switch over to.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
We spent a little more time than we imagined to conceptually understand how HashiCorp Vault operates, as well as how it is configured. This is not trivial, and keep in mind that you will need to take some time to get a thorough understanding of the tool. The documentation could be more helpful in this regard.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Hashicorp has been very responsive to our questions and inquiries up to this point. We are currently working on them to develop a more granular permissions model within Vault. We are very close to achieving our objectives with the help of their support team. We do not seem to be in the same time zone which makes it hard for escalated issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The UI / UX, first of all, is night and day difference. The main attraction after the services were this: It's user friendly. It welcomes new users and properly guides them on what to do and what you can expect. Honestly, I had a very bad experience with Microsoft Azure in 2018, so I think the Google Cloud Key Management service is best for me for now and I may give the new Azure a try later.
Read full review
HashiCorp Vault integrates with a lot of tools and systems, and the documentation was pretty robust with a lot of community help. Because HashiCorp Vault is also older than other solutions, it is already well developed with a lot of features you need for storing secrets and configuration. HashiCorp Vault is also friendlier towards application build and is focused in providing security and a lot of customization for almost any use case scenario. Bitwarden is more limited to password management of enterprise accounts, but for application usage is not that great or easy to integrate. It does not scale well also. AWS Secrets Manager on the other hand is really good but more limited to AWS applications and vendor lock is problematic as well for such a critical piece of infrastructure.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • There is no Return of investment in our operations as we use it for KMS.
  • The only ROI is that we have a piece of mind while our data is handled by Google.
  • Our main objective is being fulfilled and the staff as well as customer are happy.
  • Value for money.
Read full review
  • Allowed better access control for credentials, passwords, and important keys.
  • After we started using HashiCorp Vault, we were able to base our environment 100% as code.
  • SSH access control that is possible using HashiCorp Vault adds an extra level of security in environments where external remote access is required.
Read full review
ScreenShots

HashiCorp Vault Screenshots

Screenshot of Example of writing a secret to Vault. Secrets are always encrypted and written to backend storage. To learn more: https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/tutorials/getting-started/getting-started-first-secretScreenshot of Secrets menu to manage integrated secrets engines. Secrets Engines are components which store, generate, or encrypt data and are enabled at a path in Vault. To learn more: https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/tutorials/getting-started/getting-started-uiScreenshot of Vault identity has support for groups. A group can contain multiple entities as its members. A group can also have subgroups. To learn more: https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/concepts/identityScreenshot of HCP Vault provides all of the power and security of Vault, without the complexity and overhead of managing it yourself. To learn more:  https://cloud.hashicorp.com/products/vaultScreenshot of View entity client and non-entity client counts.Screenshot of MFA is built on top of the Identity system of Vault. To learn more: https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/auth/login-mfa