Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs. Trint
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Google Cloud Speech-to-Text | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | Speech-to-Text on Google Cloud is a tool used to convert speech into text using an API powered by Google’s AI technologies. The vendor states users can transcribe content in real time or from stored files; deliver a better user experience in products through voice commands; and, gain insights from customer interactions to improve service. | $0.02 per min |
 Trint | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Trint uses artificial intelligence to power its web-based automated transcription platform. Audio and video files are uploaded to Trint’s online software and then transcribed using automated speech recognition. The Trint Editor is the marriage of a text editor to an audio/video player: the transcribed text is “stitched” to the audio or video file, making it simple to search, verify and edit the machine-generated transcripts. Users can instantly time the length of their soundbites. They can… | $80 per month per seat |
| Google Cloud Speech-to-Text | Trint | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | $15 hour | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Speech-to-Text V1 API V1 offers data residency for multi region only. Models include short, long, phone call, and video. V1 does not include audit logging. New customers get $300 in free credits and 60 minutes for transcribing and analyzing audio free per month, not charged against your credits. Speech-to-Text V2 API V2 offers data residency for multi and single region. Models include short, long, telephony, video, and Chirp. V2 does include audit logging and support for customer managed encryption keys. | Up to a 40% discount for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud Speech-to-Text | Trint | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 9.5 |
| Usability | 8.4 | - |